Last Activity:
Sep 30, 2012
Joined:
May 29, 2007
Messages:
624
Rep Received:
23
Trophy Points:
18

Share This Page

LiverMorgh

LiverMorgh

Member

LiverMorgh was last seen:
Sep 30, 2012
    1. Stretch Armstrong
    2. Stretch Armstrong
      Stretch Armstrong
      Please don't bother me with your nonsense. Biscan played an important role in the CL that year, and when he played, Gerrard wasn't in CM. It's relevant to our discussion long ag9o, a discussion I don't wish to reignite.

      And no I don't consider Fabregas World Class, whatever that means.
    3. LiverMorgh
      LiverMorgh
      ----------
      LiverMorgh,

      If Gerrard was playing CM, Liverpool could play with two strikers! You should be coaching the team. We support you!


      Sincerely,
      Robbie Keane,
      Peter Crouch,
      Djibril Cisse,
      & Andriy Voronin
      ----------
      This is the stupidest argument of all. Hello?! Did you watch the matches when we played Keane? Gerrard played and one of Xabi and Masch sat out. So that should say enough about how Rafa rates Gerrard. The problem was, Keane wasn't upto scratch and was shipped out.

      The rest of the players you named simply show how poor your argument is.

      Rafa has to pick from these two line-ups essentially:

      Torres-Gerrard-Masch and Xabi

      or

      Torres and Voronin/Cisse/Crouch/Keane - Gerrard-Masch

      It's pretty clear which one helps the team out the best. Gerrard scores as many goals as the players you mentioned, yet Xabi is also a quality playmaker from the middle. It doesn't mean Gerrard is not a good one, get it? I hope so.
    4. LiverMorgh
      LiverMorgh
      ----------
      All those games in the center and yet Capello and Benitez don't give a flying ******** about his play there. Hmmm.

      You couldn't pick up a hint if it dropped its bollocks on your forehead.
      ----------

      See, you didn't get it the first time, so I'll say it again. This time rub your two brain cells hard and fast so they warm up enough to sponge up what is actually written.

      You're saying because Rafa and Capello don't play Gerrard in the middle that it means he can't play there. WRONG. It's because he can play elsewhere, still be effective whilst opening up a space for a Xabi or a Lampard - who aren't as versatile - making the TEAM stronger for it.
    5. LiverMorgh
      LiverMorgh
      Closed again, open it up sunshine.
    6. Twenty26Six
      Twenty26Six
      Threads open, dipshit. Go make a fool of yourself.
    7. Stretch Armstrong
      Stretch Armstrong
      Your lack of knowledge is frightening. How long have you been following Pool for?

      Ever heard of Igor Biscan?

      Please don't respond. Just have a little think to yourself, and perhaps do a little bit of research.

      You may even have to 'revise' your own opinions.

      And Fabregas 'world class'? Give me strength...
    8. Stretch Armstrong
      Stretch Armstrong
      Dude, please leave me be. Your lack of cogent reasoning verges on the demented.
    9. Grinners89
      Grinners89
      Also, I know that Lucas isnt a DM and neither is Palacios. In fact, both those players can play right midfield/left midfield to some effect. My main query was you saying that Palacios is a creative central midfielder when he is more like Masch than Xabi.

      Let's hopefully agree on most other discussions to avoid clogging up the threads with our disagreements ;) We clearly have different views on most things that have been recently discussed but I'll try and be more clear with my posts to avoid any confusion such as what just happened.
    10. Grinners89
      Grinners89
      If you interpreted that what i said was an attack on you, then i apologise. By "other supporters" i meant those that create "sack Rafa" threads after a Chelsea win and only come here to post after losses. From all your posts, you dont seem like one of those plastic supporters.

      I'll seperate my Masch/Palacios sentence into two.

      Firstly, i said that spending the same amount on Palacios as we did on Masch (18 mil) is ludicrous, especially when he would be a back-up player.

      The second part of the sentence says that we dont have the money of, eg; the Mancs, therefore we cant spend say 15-18 million players like Nani/Anderson or upwards of 30 million on Tevez. Those 3 players would not be considered starters in their best XI, therefore you could generally term them "squad players".

      That's all i meant from that paragraph. Look at the sentences as two seperate sentences. Maybe if i seperated them into two paragraphs it would be easier but I thought the 1st sentence was fairly clear.
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • Stats

    Last Activity:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    624
    Rep Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    18