So apparently the stadium deal in San Jose has collapsed and they won't meet their Thursday deadline for a solution. It appears we've seen the last of the Quakers. Meanwhile, Massah Lamar has called a presser for noon today and invited "fans" to attend. Presumably it's good news, since normally you don't invite a booing section to these things. Since Garber spilled the beans three weeks ago it's not exactly news, but the question is whether they're announcing a one year extension (so they can start trying to sell season tix) or whether something more permanent is in the offing. Personally, I will shed no tears for SJ. They were far and away the team which should have been, and in a fair world would have been, "contracted" back in 2001. Their attendance was much worse and their stadium wasn't any more acceptable then than it is now. But they won the Cup and the league figured it would be too embarassing to shut down the league champion so they took down the Mutiny instead. In a very, very real sense, the Mutes died for SJ's sins. So AFAIC the Quakers have been living on borrowed time and enjoying their team for an extra five years they didn't deserve while our FLA brethren got the shaft. Like I said: tough beans, SJ.
Re: Quakes are "Dead Team Walking" but the Governor Called and KC Gets a Stay (Crew) Will Snoop Dogg come to the Earthquakes' defense?
Re: Quakes are "Dead Team Walking" but the Governor Called and KC Gets a Stay (Crew) Didn't stop the Arena Football league. The Detroit Drive went to the Arena Bowl in all 6 years they existed (they won 4 of them) only to be moved and then folded a year later. If only the MLS could be as massive as the AFL...
Re: Quakes are "Dead Team Walking" but the Governor Called and KC Gets a Stay (Crew) I'm sure Lamar is just going to tell folks to pony up cash for another year while he dangles the carrot around looking to complete an ownership transfer deal. That defines a "major" announcement for HSG.
Re: Quakes are "Dead Team Walking" but the Governor Called and KC Gets a Stay (Crew) Now we get to find out if AEG really had a deal to move the team to Houston. They put that out to get San Jose to finally talk, and it almost worked. I never believed that Houston would be ready for the 06 season, so I expect AEG to once again give the Quakes a one year extention.
Re: Quakes are "Dead Team Walking" but the Governor Called and KC Gets a Stay (Crew) Here's the formal story about KC staying put for '06: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=352144&cc=5901
Re: Quakes are "Dead Team Walking" but the Governor Called and KC Gets a Stay (Crew) Well it looks like it is all but official. SJ is moving to Houston next season. Announcement coming very soon, as in today or tomorrow.
Well, I can empathize. I know how it is to lose a team against your will. My dad and I cried real tears when the Jazz left N'awlins and my cousin from Quebec still won't watch an Avs game after all these years. And any Browns fan can (and will) give you the most anguish-ridden story of team seperation ever. I figure that the MLS will be back in they bay eventually, and for that matter, probably in S. Florida, too, but for now, business is business, as usual.
I would feel very bad for SJ except that they a) had a great run, won some championships and did everything right and the locals simply shrugged and b) The Mutiny, which had a ferociously loyal fan base, a decent venue and the makings of a solid future had to get flushed in order to save the Quakes. I never heard a San Joser express remorse about the death of MLS in Tampa Bay, where it belongs, and so, like Tookie Williams, who never expressed remorse for blowing four people's faces off, let them die.
one thing I'm worried about, should SJ lose their team, is that we might reaquire one of our infamous lost fans, a certain Aimer that used to post here all the time. Hopefully she'll embrace the Galaxy, but given our luck this past year you never know.
This seems like a positive move for MLS. With a fresh start in Houston, there's always the opportunity for a winning hand, but in SJ, it just clearly wasn't working out. I think the best news of the day was actually the bit about Salt Lake's new stadium. Expanding to Salt Lake was one of the league's best moves ever, and this franchise is clearly in it for the long haul. The location for the RSL stadium is fantastic, probably the second best location in the league, behind only the Crew's.
Back in the Miami-Tampa Bay days, there was a certain consistency to the attendance rankings. At the bottom of the table were... Code: OVERALL HOME ROAD TEAM RECORD GAMES TOTAL AVERAGE GAMES TOTAL AVERAGE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2001 Miami Fusion 16-5-5 14 156,481 11,177 12 171,282 14,274 Kansas City Wizards 11-13-3 13 142,402 10,954 14 166,060 11,861 Tampa Bay Mutiny 4-21-2 14 146,704 10,479 13 217,347 16,719 San Jose Earthquakes 13-7-6 13 125,250 9,635 13 207,954 15,996 2000 San Jose Earthquakes 7-17-8 16 199,364 12,460 16 197,909 12,369 Tampa Bay Mutiny 16-12-4 16 151,232 9,452 16 219,245 13,703 Kansas City Wizards 16-7-9 16 145,793 9,112 16 234,090 14,631 Miami Fusion 12-15-5 16 119,352 7,460 16 212,710 13,294 1999 Tampa Bay Mutiny 14-18 16 209,700 13,106 16 233,142 14,571 Dallas Burn 19-13 16 195,381 12,211 16 208,346 13,022 Miami Fusion 13-19 16 139,021 8,689 16 261,679 16,355 Kansas City Wizards 8-24 16 130,924 8,183 16 191,229 11,952 1998 Dallas Burn 15-17 16 175,162 10,948 16 198,315 12,395 Tampa Bay Mutiny 12-20 16 164,999 10,312 16 226,433 14,152 Miami Fusion 15-17 16 164,548 10,284 16 253,269 15,829 Kansas City Wizards 12-20 16 129,163 8,073 16 230,245 14,390 The Clash were generally around seventh in the league in attendance.
Re: Quakes are "Dead Team Walking" but the Governor Called and KC Gets a Stay (Crew) I stand corrected. Good luck San Jose in your efforts to get your club back.
So let me get this straight: They're moving the team to Houston but will be renaming and rebranding it, keeping the Quakes colors and identity "in reserve" because they think they'll have a building and an investor in San Jose in two years? Am I getting this right?
I call bull**********. The Mutiny were always near the top of everyone's chopping block, as early as 1998. Them and the Wiz. There was really no contest in those first six seasons. San Jose outdrew Tampa in five of six seasons. Over that time, they averaged 2,645 more fans per game. Tampa only topped 12,000 in average attendance once, in 1999. The Quakes topped it four times. The Mutiny had no owner, and no prospects for one. They had no stadium, nor any prospects for one. They too had a killer lease. In other words, they were like San Jose, except they attracted fewer fans and didn't even have potential owners kicking the tires, like SVSE was with the Quakes. Add in the fact that the Quakes were part of MLS' best rivalry and were the defending MLS champs, and it was no contest. But contrary to your assertions, it wasn't much of a contest even before the filthy-haired Canuck's golden-goal at Crew Stadium. There was much more promise in San Jose than in Tampa, thus the league tried to stick it out there and see if that promise could be fulfilled in the form of local ownership and a stadium. It didn't work, but it was the right decision. To say that Tampa died for San Jose's sins is not accurate. Tampa's sins were to a greater degree, and there was much less hope of rehabilitation. Sirk PS- I think the league has made the right move in regard to the Quakes, but I just don't see how Tampa is the true victim in all of this.
A cameo appearance. I love those. As for you, "Sirk" (if that IS your real name!) there were a lot of differences, one of which being abandoning the entire state of Florida, a soccer hotbed - particularly for the Holy Grail of MLS marketing: the "ethnic market" - in favor of keeping a weak sister in San Jose. They burned the bridges, the ferrys, the rafts, the pontoons, the skiffs and the rowboats with that one. Florida might as well be located on the other side of Rangoon for all the good it will ever do MLS in our lifetimes. There were any number of strategic reasons why MLS did not want to abandon Flroida and - in doing so - the entire Southeast. As for attendance, while it's true that San Jose started out strong, gross mismangement by complete idiots drove it down to the point that, in 2001 when DeeeWayne Dirtbag hit the shot heard round the Ohio Expo Center parking lots, the Quakers were dead last in league attendance despite having the best team in the league, lower even than the Sad Sack Mutes. No, they didn't have an owner. Neither did Dallas. Hasn't worked out too badly there. So put THAT in your pipe and smoke it, Mr Schmartypants.
I can't remember who penned this but someone wrote a number of years ago about the success of MLS and how it should bring soccer to American through grass-roots efforts in cities that will support soccer instead of trying to shoehorn it into large cities based on "ethnic" base or some other real or perceived segment. San Jose had a fan base (of arguable size), a rivaly with someone (LA and recently Donovan) and success in MLS (MLS Cup). One different I would like to point out about Florida compared to the recent demise of the San Jose Earthquakes is that SJ, even though they have gone through ownership and names changes, have been in MLS since the beginning. Florida was contracted relatively early in the MLS lifespan. That doesn't make any of this right or wrong but I would consider the loss of San Jose more of a loss because of it's life span compared to Tampa and Miami.
So some team that is wearing a different color will come to CCS and receive an extra large helping of Sigi-smackdown next year.
Your inability to recognize humor is stupifying at best and honorable mention special olympics material at worst. I suggest you look into David Cross' material about the people in LA that are "going to make it".