3-4-3

Discussion in 'USA Men' started by SFA1, Jun 5, 2005.

  1. SFA1

    SFA1 New Member

    Apr 30, 2004
    I like it and it seemed to work but why not Donovan as center forward? That is his top position. You have Dempsey or Obrien who can play attacking midfield. You can have Obrien and Mastroeni behind Donovan.

    ...........................Keller..............................
    .................................................................
    Cherundolo............Pope..............Bocanegra....
    ..................................................................
    ........................Mastoreni............................
    Ralston.....................................Convey/Lewis
    ..........................Obrien..............................
    .................................................................
    Johnson..............Donovan...........Beasley........
     
  2. igot5onit

    igot5onit New Member

    May 4, 2005
    Los angeles
    Ralston is a peice of ****, Can't any besides hm play in the position?
     
  3. Sinter

    Sinter New Member

    Oct 12, 2003
    New York City, U.S.A
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Eddie Pope in the middle of a 3-4-3 against any top team in the world? *shudders*
     
  4. Mikeymike15

    Mikeymike15 Member

    Jul 7, 2004
    Atlanta
    for your defensive 3/4, why not gibbs or gooch in lieu of pope?
     
  5. CoachCoach

    CoachCoach New Member

    Jul 18, 2004
    USA
    Ralston didn't have it together against Costa Rica. Sometimes he's alright, sometimes not.

    I like Frankie out there, but i'm sure a lot don't agree with that option either.
     
  6. IlliniFire

    IlliniFire New Member

    Dec 10, 2003
    Urbana, Illinois
    How about cherundolo out right and a backline of
    Gooch-----Gibbs----Boca?
     
  7. voros

    voros Member

    Jun 7, 2002
    Parts Unknown
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I did not see us playing a 3-4-3 at any time yesterday. The only 3-4-3 I saw was the graphic ESPN showed us.

    It looked pretty much like a 4-4-2 to me.
     
  8. GKbenji

    GKbenji Member+

    Jan 24, 2003
    Fort Collins CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd call their formation a "3.5 - 4 - 2.5". The left side of the field "drooped" a bit, with Convey coming back a lot to help defensively and Beasley dropping back into the midfield. Convey wasn't really playing left back, but he wasn't really playing a true wing mid either.

    As for Ralston, please tell me what other options we have at right mid? That and left back are still the two holes on the US squad.
     
  9. Sanguine

    Sanguine Member

    Jul 4, 2003
    Reston, VA
    indeed.
     
  10. YankHibee

    YankHibee Member+

    Mar 28, 2005
    indianapolis
    The formation will change quite a bit, I think, with the return of our three best DMF's in Reyna, O'Brien, and Mastro. If any two of them are on the field, three back isnt a bad idea against the better teams.
     
  11. UncleKizzle

    UncleKizzle New Member

    Jun 5, 2005
    Madrid
    I would like to see JOB come back on defense rather than the midfield.
     
  12. dﮥnny

    dﮥnny New Member

    Mar 26, 2005
    US
    ----------------------Keller
    -------Gibbs--------Mastoreni------Bocanegra

    ---------------------Reyna
    Beasley----------Dempsy/O'Brien-----------Lewis
    ---------------------Donovan
    ----------Johnson---------------McBride
     
  13. thespinydogfish

    thespinydogfish New Member

    Jun 3, 2003
    1-step ahead of you
    And yet . . . Ralston was one of the few players with ANY impact against England. Why is everyone down on him?
     
  14. thespinydogfish

    thespinydogfish New Member

    Jun 3, 2003
    1-step ahead of you
    Pope was as effective Captain Ahab against an England C-Team. I hope we NEVER see him in the middle again against a quality team. Embarassing.
     
  15. Serie Zed

    Serie Zed Member

    Jul 14, 2000
    Arlington
    I think Beasley and Convey were pushed forward at the start. The same way we were unbalanced to the right against England our left side was leaning forward against Costa Rica.

    After we scored I think they dropped back into more of a normal 4-4-2 (85 minutes of the game). Which was why Convey got the start I think.
     
  16. kubrick74

    kubrick74 Member

    Apr 19, 2004

    I'd say gibbs and gooch in place of pope and dolo and we'd have a fanatastic team!
     
  17. UncleKizzle

    UncleKizzle New Member

    Jun 5, 2005
    Madrid
    I am not ready to write off Pope. As bad as he was against England, he played well against CR. Before his injuries he was one of our best backs.
     

Share This Page