@soccernutter when they go low, we go high ended in 2016. I am sorry you didn't get the memo. They fix they face to talk reckless, well we gone finish it. Especially as they have a long history of talking shite.
You've chosen a poor example of a post to defend 'nutter whether your belief in the overall is actually there or not. There are absolutely no references to gender other than those which are necessary to write the sentences properly. If you think I wouldn't have said the same thing about a male, you're wrong. What happened here is, 'Nutter is particularly and irrationally sensitive about men commenting on a woman's appearance at any time, in any fashion. In his mind, it equates to sexism regardless of intent. My referring to a human being who happens to be female as another species of organism doesn't mean I think I'm better than her. I mean, I do think I'm better and smarter than her, but it's not because she's female.
I've been set up to be crucified all along. I want you all to practice the morals I'd display if I were still here. I'll miss you all.
Whether MTG resembles a Cro-Magnon or not isn't the point. She is a piece of doo doo though. To keep it gender neutral so is Mat Gaetz, Josh Hawley, etc, etc, etc! I could go on and on and on and on. Ps...this one is special too!
As an aside, if you watch the video, Lauren Boebert makes an absolute mess of the sign of the cross. I have seen the video multiple times and it pulls focus for me every single time. I can almost hear Sister Regina yelling at her from the great beyond. We would catch an earful if we didn't sing or had a 3-point stance in the pew (knees on the kneeler thing, rear on the seat, and slouched over the back like Frank Carbone in Goodfellas). I don't even want to see how she genuflects before getting in the pew. check out 1:26
I'll comment on the similar actions of a fictional Lars Boebert, and you can transfer the sentiment over to Lauren if you see fit. Bro probably doesn't go to church as much as he wants you to think he does is what this is. One of the two unspoken recent qualifiers for public service is military experience and church attendance. Clinton broke the first ceiling, but the second still has folks jumping thru hoops. Lars would probably rather be out golfing or doing something else constructive instead of trying to remember the proper way to curtsy and sign, but the job calls for making sure people see him in church.
New Caledonian uprising seen from POV of an Australian indiginous person while in the middle of it: https://asiapacificreport.nz/2024/0...same-colonial-white-privilege-that-caused-it/
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/politics/...-sets-an-unfortunate-precedent_6672617_5.html Well, not a surprise act in fact.
1. Oh my God, that first paragraph. Maybe it’s just me but I found it really funny. 2. Maybe it’s just me, but I have a hard time putting a lot of stock into journalism that hasn’t been proofread. Unless “accodent” is some Aussie thing I’ve never heard of…. 3. She tries a few times to match that first paragraph but comes up short.
"Gill Scott Heron" is pretty good. (Context: "There were debates and demands for updates via text (sorry, Gill Scott Heron, this revolution will be broadcast on WhatsApp)."
You know thanks to an Anglophile media courtesy of WW2, the ********ery of France in its colonies and refusal to leave would be better highlighted.
I don't get it. What's the link with him? Is this a mixture of Aussie/Yank idiom and cultural context?