Quarterly Quarrel - The Financial Discussion Part 5

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by Ruud v.Nistelrooy 10, Mar 11, 2014.

  1. MizzouMUFC

    MizzouMUFC Member+

    Apr 10, 2010
    Places
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    More confusion with regards to the bids. Some reporters saying the new bid is for 6.5 mil + 1 bil commitment to spending on the club. Others are saying the bid isn’t much different than the last bid which is equal to SJRs. Who the ******** knows at this point just wrap it up and get the Glazers out already. ********s sake.
     
  2. CybrSlydr

    CybrSlydr Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jun 30, 2013
    Casper, WY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    United are worth whatever someone will pay them. Their value is what you're talking about.
     
    Deadtigers repped this.
  3. JamesA

    JamesA Member+

    Dec 7, 2004
    Victoria
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Which is why accountants have multiple definitions for the term "value".
     
    Deadtigers and CybrSlydr repped this.
  4. J'can

    J'can Member+

    Jul 3, 2007
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    I would opine that this proves his point even more, no? The money bags don't want to pay more for something that doesn't have commensurate value

    Friggin accountants. Overcomplicating sh1t :oops:
     
    Deadtigers and CybrSlydr repped this.
  5. Ruud v.Nistelrooy 10

    Staff Member

    Jamaica
    Jun 4, 2006
    Antilla
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Jamaica
    you're still trying to defend this why? a professional firm has already valued the club at just below £4b. buying it at £6b + additional cost of neglect is NOT good value. this isn't debatable. and clearly no one wants to pay the £6b.

    besides why do you even care? you were the one complaining and berating people for their morals the other day for wanting the Qataris as owners and now you're complaining about the same Qataris "penny pinching" on a circa £6b deal?
     
  6. CybrSlydr

    CybrSlydr Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jun 30, 2013
    Casper, WY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Because if the Qataris really want United, with their unfathomable wealth, this price is pocket change to them.

    I don't see the Glazers greed being the issue, I see this unfathomable wealth trying to nickel and dime to save a penny when they could just walk in and unzip their pants and thrown down on the table and walk away with it.

    This notion of overpaying when you have this unfathomable wealth rings more than hollow. If you want it, just pay it and walk away. The Qataris don't need to make a quick profit or worry about a billion or two here or there on the price.

    And no, I don't want the Qataris to buy them - I'm just tired of everyone thinking they need to make a good deal when they obviously don't.
     
    Deadtigers repped this.
  7. JamesA

    JamesA Member+

    Dec 7, 2004
    Victoria
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Hes not defending anything I don't think.

    Accounting value and economic value are entirely different concepts. Your adding of the term "good" is subjective as you're not giving weight to the intrinsic value placed on the club for the Sheikh.
     
    Raul-7 and CybrSlydr repped this.
  8. Stud83

    Stud83 Member+

    Jun 1, 2005
    So how does this impact our transfers this summer? Are we on hold until there's more clarity on this?
     
  9. J'can

    J'can Member+

    Jul 3, 2007
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    There is no economic value in the market. Only intrinsic value so not sure what happens now
     
  10. SF19

    SF19 Member+

    Jun 8, 2013
    RvN is right. It's not worth that price and the Glazers will settle for something less.

    Likely outcome now is Sir Jim Ratcliffe will become major owner of United paying a more sensible amount for majority share (less than 4 billion). Glazers get their piece of the pie still. Sheikh Jassim will buy a club like West Ham, maybe.

    It doesn't sound like we are actually improving upon our circumstances under the Glazers, but it's the start to some changes and some needed investment. As fans we have to remind SJR of his commitment to a "progressive ownership."
     
  11. CybrSlydr

    CybrSlydr Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jun 30, 2013
    Casper, WY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's like going to a Ferrari dealership and trying to haggle them down. Oh, the car is valued at 400k, but you're selling it for 650k and trying to nickel and dime them down.

    You have the money. United, while a business, is also vanity/sports-washing endeavor.

    Pay what they want to get the product you want.
     
  12. Sofabloke

    Sofabloke Member+

    Dec 24, 2003
    Mu
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Glazers just need to make a decision so things can start to move and stop hiding behind the Raine Group.

    The process is done - 5 lengthy, detailed rounds of bids done already.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Ruud v.Nistelrooy 10

    Staff Member

    Jamaica
    Jun 4, 2006
    Antilla
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Jamaica
    and this is exactly what i mean. this is purely complaining for complaining sake.

    you want people to piss away money because they have it to satisfy your want. you not thinking the Glazers are an issue says a lot.

    people who amass that kind of wealth don't keep it by making bad deals. it's as if you don't understand the scale of a £6b purchase. it's not an insignificant sum in the least. and again why do you even care? if you don't want the Qataris to own the club then don't complain about them penny pinching. let them do that and fail then.

    lastly re: the Qataris - i asked you who you consider a suitable owner and you weren't able to answer that so
     
  14. CybrSlydr

    CybrSlydr Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jun 30, 2013
    Casper, WY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Maybe it is complaining just to complain - but it doesn't change the facts. The Qataris could have made this whole process a lot shorter and simpler if they just gave the Glazers what they wanted.

    I'm certain that whatever outlay they make for United will be dwarfed by the income from petroleum products. A literal drop in the bucket. Spending what the Glazers want isn't going to bankrupt the Qataris. What an absolutely ludicrous notion.

    As for who? I'd take SJR and the Glazers over the Qataris every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

    In the ethical dilemma debate of the lesser of evils, I'll choose grifters and corporate greed/environmental damagers over documented murderers 100% of the time and I'm disappointed more people dont feel the same, that they want possible success on the football pitch at literally any cost.
     
  15. Father Ted

    Father Ted BigSoccer Supporter

    Manchester United, Galway United, New York Red Bulls
    Nov 2, 2001
    Connecticut
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    Lol you think rich people stay rich by throwing money frivolously around just because they have it. They stay rich because they are penny pinchers.
    Also if Jim Ratcliffe is so great at owning football clubs, why haven't Nice and Lausanne done anything? Checks Ligue 1 table.... Nice are 9th!
     
    Deadtigers repped this.
  16. MizzouMUFC

    MizzouMUFC Member+

    Apr 10, 2010
    Places
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    If I had to guess, our base transfer budget is probably something like 100 mil plus player sales even if it’s Glazers still in charge. And due to FFP even if the Jassim were to takeover, he would probably be limited as to what he could do this window. Best guess is our budget could change from that base by 100-150 mil. Middle end of that spectrum if SJR wins the bid and upper end of Jassim wins.
     
    SF19 repped this.
  17. CybrSlydr

    CybrSlydr Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jun 30, 2013
    Casper, WY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    We are talking about Qatar, who makes untold amounts of money from petro exports. You seriously think another billion is going to make them so financially insolvent that just can't afford it??? Pull your head out. The Qataris wouldn't be buying United if they didn't think they would easily make back their money. Paying the Glazers off just means it takes 4 years instead of five.

    How SJR manages the club or the others he owns is immaterial to me. I would rather United play as a mid-table team fighting for UCL every year like we are now with SJR than buy championships with oil money mixed with the blood of thousands and untold thousands of dead full-stop.

    I place my principles above the on-pitch success of the team. I would rather grifters and cheats own the team than murderers. I don't know how I can make this any more clear.
     
  18. SF19

    SF19 Member+

    Jun 8, 2013
    From the way things are shaping up, we are probably spending 100 million alone on Mount and Kim. Maybe we will do what Chelsea has done with those longer term deals.
     
  19. MizzouMUFC

    MizzouMUFC Member+

    Apr 10, 2010
    Places
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Well, actually it’s pretty easy to stay rich once you’re already rich. Hell, just by throwing a majority of your money in a market index you’ll return roughly 7% annually. And they have way more lucrative forms of investing at their disposal.


    And if we’re talking about Jassim, it’s essentially unlimited wealth. The sovereign wealth fund could buy United 20 times over.

    People here talking about value are acting like it’s an absolute term. It’s not. It’s relative.
     
    SF19 and CybrSlydr repped this.
  20. SF19

    SF19 Member+

    Jun 8, 2013
    @CybrSlydr

    Let's just wait until Friday at this point. That's Jassim's deadline. You may have a point, but it's crazy if 6 billion GBP got spent on Man U when Jassim could easily buy any other club for a fraction. He's not stuck for options. And as I said before, it's easy for someone of that means to create a new "United." It's been done before with AFC Wimbledon.
     
  21. CybrSlydr

    CybrSlydr Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jun 30, 2013
    Casper, WY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I would say the majority of the "worth" Qatar is bidding on is the pedigree of United being one of the most successful clubs in the most competitive league on the planet. The prestige and "je ne sais quoi" of owning something that massive and successful, or at least that's what the Glazers think and are literally banking on.
     
    SF19 repped this.
  22. Stud83

    Stud83 Member+

    Jun 1, 2005
    Fair points, but I'm more interested in timing. Are we actually going to pursue/complete any signings or are we waiting for some sort of a resolution
     
  23. SF19

    SF19 Member+

    Jun 8, 2013
    We should know soon because Jassim either drops out after Friday or wins out. Once we have a preferred bidder, we should know how to sort the summer window out, but with Glazers still in control, I expect a lot of cautiousness this summer.
     
  24. MizzouMUFC

    MizzouMUFC Member+

    Apr 10, 2010
    Places
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Its going to hurt if we get stuck with Glazers or SJR/Glazer combo and Jassim buys West Ham and turns them into Newcastle 2.0.
     
    benni... repped this.
  25. Anonymous_United

    Manchester United
    Brazil
    Jul 13, 2018
    This is so fecking infuriating, TTFO Glazers.
     

Share This Page