NSR: CHICAGO Political Thread ***HIGHLY TOXIC - ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK***

Discussion in 'Chicago Fire' started by skinut, Nov 12, 2016.

  1. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    Evidently he’s not right.
     
    Martininho repped this.
  2. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    Oath Keepers founder sentenced to 18 years in Jan. 6 seditious conspiracy case
    Stewart Rhodes, who said after the Capitol attack that the rioters “should have brought rifles," received the longest sentence of any Jan. 6 defendant to date.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...ears-jan-6-seditious-conspiracy-cas-rcna85852

    "He also celebrated Oath Keepers' actions in the immediate aftermath of the attack, after meeting with other members of the group at an Olive Garden in Virginia that night."
     
    LIZZIE, Mac97, xtomx and 1 other person repped this.
  3. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    “I never have said this to anyone I have sentenced: You pose an ongoing threat and peril to our democracy and the fabric of this country,” District Judge Amit Mehta told Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes before ultimately sentencing him to 18 years for seditious conspiracy.
     
    LIZZIE, Mac97, harrylee773 and 1 other person repped this.
  4. The Irish Rover

    The Irish Rover Member+

    Aug 1, 2010
    Dublin
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    Too little.

    The prosecution wanted 25, minimum 20, either of which would have been consistent with sentencing guidelines.

    Give his age, it probably won't make much difference in the sense that his working life will be over by the time he's released, but for offences against the state of that kind you give him the max, and in a maximum security facility (maybe even a Super Max). Then you hope that he's forgotten about so that he has no political life either after he's released.

    Like somebody said, the answer to the "who shot Ashli Babbit?" question is "a patriot".
     
    Pennsylvania Dave repped this.
  5. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Agree. 100%. They should all receive the maximum sentences under law. If he was Muslim, he would have.

    However, as disappointed that this prick is not going away for 25 years, I am glad that these convicts are finally receiving significant prison sentences, considering the first batch of them were given incredibly light sentences (trespassing and the like).



    That is disgusting.
    She, like every one of those bastards, should have been arrested, on the spot if possible, tried, convicted and sentenced to prison.

    The police should not shoot suspects to death. Extrajudicial killing is wrong in almost all cases.

    Babbitt deserved to rot in prison, not rot in the ground.
     
  6. The Irish Rover

    The Irish Rover Member+

    Aug 1, 2010
    Dublin
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    Surely some contradiction there
     
  7. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Not a contradiction at all.
    In certain self defense situations, in limited extreme cases, killing someone may be justified.

    Ashley Babbit was not an actual threat (of imminent death) to anyone.
    She was, by all accounts, committing a crime.
    For that, she should be arrested and tried and convicted and sentenced, just like the rest of the insurrectionists are.
    THAT would be the "patriotic" thing to do.
    Just killing her was not.

    No contradiction there.
     
  8. The Irish Rover

    The Irish Rover Member+

    Aug 1, 2010
    Dublin
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    She was at the front line of an out-of-control mob that was breaking through barricaded doors to attack the officer who shot her, several of his colleagues, plus a number of congressmen and staffers who had nowhere to retreat to. That's a matter of record.

    Had she got through she'd undoubtedly have helped others through and unbarricaded those doors. Arresting her was so dangerous as to be impossible.

    Shooting her was protecting others as well as personal self-defence.
     
  9. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    #5759 xtomx, May 27, 2023
    Last edited: May 27, 2023
    Nope. It should not work like that.

    Killing her to "protect others" in NOT justification or self defense, when she was not a threat.
    Don't even go down that road.

    See, this is the bastardization of the "self defense" rule. I object to extending it this far out.
    Your "she'd undoubtedly have helped others through and unbarricaded those doors" is the sort of stupid, fascist "future crime" bullshit used to justify all manner of extrajudicial killing and militarization of the police.

    We cannot and do not prevent potential crimes by killing people.
    It is NOT how the criminal justice works. Just stop with that nonsense.

    Look, I am not going to defend Ashley f'n Babbit. She was involved in felonious behavior, but she should not be killed.

    If killing her was "patriotic," why didn't those "patriots" just open fire on the everyone, especially the ones who were, actually, armed with weapons? That would have "protected others," wouldn't it?

    No, on second thought, I am not going to continue this nonsensical, facile discussion with you. I have way better things to do with time.
     
    bunge repped this.
  10. Pennsylvania Dave

    Jul 31, 2012
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
  11. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    harrylee773, xtomx, Mac97 and 1 other person repped this.
  12. harrylee773

    harrylee773 Member+

    Jul 28, 2004
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Fuegofan, xtomx and bunge repped this.
  13. sportscrazed2

    sportscrazed2 Member+

    Jul 30, 2008
    Mordor, Middle Earth
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Oh it’s a travesty. The amount of money that could have completely solved the homeless and healthcare problems in the city being funneled into billionaires pockets to do their job for them? How about no? Pay for your own ********ing stadium and if it’s not profitable go out of business. Free market right? Imagine spending that money to build affordable housing on the south side or improving/expanding the cta so people can get better paying jobs without access to cars?
     
    LIZZIE, harrylee773 and xtomx repped this.
  14. harrylee773

    harrylee773 Member+

    Jul 28, 2004
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Ding ding ding! WINNER.

    Just today, the Buffalo Bills broke ground on their $1.2 billy publicly funded stadium in New York. Now, $1.2 bill won’t solve all of the problems of most municipalities but it will definitely help - hell, give it out as grants to small business owners if you have to prop up capitalism but a giant stadium that will be used 10-30 times a year in most cases ain’t solving shit. And the owners could pay for the stadiums themselves, but show me a billionaire that isn’t greedy and … well, you can’t, cuz they wouldn’t be a billionaire if they weren’t greedy.

    Anyone thinking that the Bears aren’t looking for as many free handouts as they can possibly get is mistaken- hell, the way things are the Bears would be dumb not to, and that’s the thing that makes me wish I wasn’t sports fan more than just about anything else.
     
    LIZZIE, sportscrazed2, Mac97 and 3 others repped this.
  15. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Donald Tr*mp indicted by the DOJ for taking classified documents and obstruction of justice.

    Apparently, there are 7 charges, including espionage charge!
     
    LIZZIE, sportscrazed2, Mac97 and 2 others repped this.
  16. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    Somehow I missed the espionage charge. May he follow in Mussolini’s footsteps.

    [​IMG]
     
    Martininho and harrylee773 repped this.
  17. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
  18. sportscrazed2

    sportscrazed2 Member+

    Jul 30, 2008
    Mordor, Middle Earth
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Jump in the fire 5171728F-3F87-4173-9E55-154F8FA9223A.jpeg
     
  19. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    LIZZIE, Fuegofan and xtomx repped this.
  20. sportscrazed2

    sportscrazed2 Member+

    Jul 30, 2008
    Mordor, Middle Earth
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If Trump goes to jail what is more likely? He’s broken out Fast Five style or murdered immediately? Or he puts a imperious curse on whoever is running as republican?
     
  21. lurak

    lurak Member+

    Aug 24, 2007
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Tricky Dick keeps looking better every day. Those Republicans back then had the balls to tell the President that his time was up and Richard Nixon was gracious enough to do the right thing and leave.

    I don't want to think about what could happen if and when this goes to trial. Too many stupid people out there.
     
    bunge repped this.
  22. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    No, Nixon looks worse every day. Read Nixonland or the countless other books about Nixon's time in office.

    Nixon had Ford to pardon him BEFORE even an impeachment was launched, to say nothing of criminal charges. He would not have resigned without that assurance.

    Of course, Trump had Pence who would have pardoned him in a heartbeat, as well...if Trump stepped aside. Trump could not do that. His ego would not allow that.

    The differences between Nixon and Trump are that Nixon was smart and an experienced politician. Trump is neither of those things.

    Nixon knew what he was doing and knew how to play the system. Fortunately for the sake of our democracy, Trump does not.
     
  23. lurak

    lurak Member+

    Aug 24, 2007
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    I agree that Nixon was not a good person for what he did, but I see can't believe all of the sycophants in DC that are falling all over themselves to continue to support Trump.

    I hope this forces a big reset in American Politics, but I know that I am only dreaming.
     
    LIZZIE and milicz repped this.
  24. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Yes, this is not "Nixon looks good," but the Republicans are much worse.
     
  25. overlap_old_coach

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    May 2, 2022
     
    Fuegofan, bunge and xtomx repped this.

Share This Page