I was just confused by your terminology as in the US context centrist means someone who intentionally positions between the two parties. So I wondered if you were arguing that US policy on Ukraine ought to be 'centrist'. Given Trump/RDS/MTG are essentially adopting the Kremlin view - i don't think centrist offers much of value here.
Agreed. I think we are on the same page that Biden and the coalition are choosing between a variety of policy options that are within the mainstream of coherent policy views - even if the choices are difficult My problem with the likes of Die Linke who try to position as the 'serious tankies' is there is a lack of reality as to how european leaders actually make Putin stop his offensive, short of surrender. So I don't see that stuff as serious or 'centrist'
Xi visits Russia: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/live...-live-putin-xi-meeting-to-discuss-ukraine-war More here: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64990826
Zeihan claims by May of this year we'll get a better picture of who's gonna win this war. I dont know how legit this guy is, I'm just posting it for reference
I can't stop laughing https://t.co/B1tVRXePvw— Julia Ioffe (@juliaioffe) March 19, 2023 I'm sure that'd go splendidly for them (even if you forget the fact that they are a NATO member).
Preparation for Trump Tuesday? Steel barricades arriving outside Manhattan Criminal Court @CBSNews pic.twitter.com/aWESUZ01fU— Robert Costa (@costareports) March 20, 2023
Not necessarily in between. In general I would call a moderate/centrist a politician who doesn’t go too far in either direction in terms of what’s the basic role of the government. Not too big a role, but also not too small. They may lean bigger or smaller, but only up to a reasonable point, and also understanding that there are exceptions, times to either take a bigger role, or to reduce the role. The centrist also will in general support his own party (otherwise he should change parties) but is willing to consider the possibility that sometimes his own party could be making a mistake, and sometimes the other party may have a point. Maybe our party is going too far in blocking the judges that the president nominates, or maybe our spending bill goes too far in spending on too many programs, or maybe the president’s position on a war is the right one, and we should support it even if doing so helps him politically. And sometimes the politics of compromise means a give and take in which my centrist candidate realizes that based on political realities and for the good of the country he has to accept something that he does not agree with, whether it’s a tax cut or a tax increase, or a spending cut or a spending increase, sometimes even having to accept having to bend a bit on something that goes against what he promised and got him elected, for the sake of compromise, but obviously without going too far, and while remaining true to his principles. And finally a centrist is always on the side of protecting the democratic institutions, and against undermining them for ideological reasons, and will stand up to the extremists in his own party, and even to the leadership of his own party, if they do. Those are the type of candidates I'm looking for. They are the ones who make a democratic system work. And there are too few of those left.
In this context, along with other of your clarifying posts, I don’t take much issue with your statement. I’m just getting overly tired and frustrated with hearing about the sanctity of the “middle ground” in light of the current political reality. It’s do or die for democracy here, and across the world, right now. I’m here for a “both sides” when the sides are pro or anti democratic, regardless of the side of the political spectrum. In the US context, it is clear where that line is drawn. The anti-democratic factions on the left don’t hold any of the levers of power, so nitpicking about it is a distraction and counter productive. So yeah, there are weirdo lefties calling for the US to withdraw from UKR and cease funding, but those people are not party leaders and potential POTUS, unlike our dear GOP friends. The weirdos should be ignored & deplatformed, not brought into the discussion to provide “balance.”
Medvedev calls for hypersonic missile on the ICC in the Hague: Russia's former president suggested firing a hypersonic missile at The Hague after Putin's ICC arrest warrant: 'Look carefully into the sky' Business Insider on MSN.com|33 minutes ago Dmitry Medvedev said NATO wouldn't retaliate even if Russia bombed the International Criminal Court following its arrest warrant for Putin. The insanity of letting these people believe they're justified in their criminal military adventures over the past two decades without consequences breeds this kind of imbecility and it's unfectious as we see the same imbecility in the USA politicians and their arse licking European right wingers.
What Medvedev needs is for the Betty Ford clinic to start issuing warrants. Hell, Putin might even hand him over - for Medvedev's sake.
I read all your other posts but I am simply going to quote this I agree with your centrist views but those are not the "centrist" views I hate. For me a centrist is Russia has 20% of Ukraine so lets split the difference Ukraine gets to keep half of Russia gained. Those people I hate. As for your other examples some things are legal or not. Defining legality does not make it something centrist. What do you mean? You mean the lady who had her shaking hands with Putin on campaign leaflets is pro Putin Get outta here!!!
Why do sane people call this kind of imbecility an ominous warning? Do they think it's a real option on the table? Newsweek on MSN.com|6 hours ago Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev issued an ominous warning on Monday, suggesting that Russia could strike the International Criminal Court (ICC) with a hypersonic missile in response to its decision to issue an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin.
Also, these crazy things being said are for local consumption, not international. They are projecting (poser-style) power to make Russians citizens feel like they, under Putin, are still a prominent world power. These words aren't for anyone outside Russia and Belarus to take seriously, and they know that.
https://www.theguardian.com › law › 2023 › mar › 20 › icc-russian-war-crimes-ukraine-international-criminal-court-karim-khan?ref=upstract.com ICC to plead for extra money to pursue Russian war crimes in Ukraine ... VandaagA conference in Lviv on 3 March changed the terms of reference of a seven-nation joint Ukraine war crimes investigation team to provide a future role for a new international centre for the ...
Looks like Macron's PM survives. https://www.yahoo.com/news/opposition-mps-walk-french-pm-183812015.html France really needs the reforms, that is why Macron is risking so much politically.
Barricades are a good idea, but given what I’ve seen of how New Yorkers treat the Proud Boys and their ilk I think there may be substantial human barricades as well. Hope it doesn’t get too ugly.
If they put those steel barriers hooked on the spark plugs, everything should be fine....with an occasionally whiff of roasted meat....
Ask Conte 🗣️ 'Until now, I tried to hide the situation...''It is 20 years with the owner and they have never won something. That is the story of Tottenham'Antonio Conte's press conferences are box office 🍿#TelegraphFootball | #THFC pic.twitter.com/1aUTTAp55i— Telegraph Football (@TeleFootball) March 20, 2023