Well, there's my lack of knowledge of SF hurting me. haha. I thought they were the same bridge. Oops.
Ah, yes, that's a common misconception. The way you can tell them apart is that one of them is an iconic symbol of California, dominating the skyline and is of historical significance as it was the first thing on the American mainland that thousands of US troops saw upon returning from the Pacific theater of WWII, and the other one goes to Oakland.
Yes. I believe you have the option to buy it outright, or as a subscription. Also, unless they changed it, it's user based, not car based. So sell your Tesla and you can't recuperate the cost.
In 2019 Tesla bought back my first car after almost two years because it had so many problems. They bought it back at the cost of a new one including “full self driving” (which at the time I believe they offered it to me at 2k). On my old one I had not bought it. So it had just been a running joke for us that they gave us the money for it because it wasn’t real anyway. We got a second Tesla in 2021 but did not buy the option (it was then 10k. ).
I am reading Smartest Guys in the Room at the moment about Enron, Skilling, Lay etc The hubris so much reminds me of the Valley Tech bro industry and really offered a warning about Wall Street and the GFC I feel like a lot of the same mistakes are being repeated - Crazy valuations based on hype? Check - Absurd founder/CEO cults of personality? Check - Extremely poor board governance? Check - Over focus on shareprice? Check - Stockprice/Financial manipulation? Check - Fawning media coverage? Check - Lack of due diligence from investors? Check - Investors flooding in to quick buck / high risk frauds? Check - Lack of any expertise in markets? - Actual fraud? Check Look at SBF - he ticks every box. For all the criticisms of Zuckus (metrics fraud??), he did grow a massive cash machine with real users and epic numbers of advertisers. Now we seem to be experiencing a wave of 'innovation' that is basically financial fraud as a business model - see Crypto - because it's easier to spend all your money on hype and then dump on retail, than it is to build a real tech company
My criticism of Tesla, apart from its insanely poor corporate governance, is that it's been intentionally miss sold as an AI/tech company. Basically it is a hardware company with innovation in battery tech. They are not saving the world from climate change or making robot trucks or any of that crap. They are just converting oversize, heavy US cars to electric - and that is what they should focus on.
I sense sarcasm! Ps...with Easter just around the corner I'd like to remind you...your chances of being killed by a bunny are pretty low but never zero!
The tech is the best part of Tesla, so I'm not sure it is out of line to call them an AI/Tech company. The cars themselves are subpar on the quality standpoint (this is actually true of most EVs right now), but the battery, power management, and infotainment tech is superior to every car company right now and, honestly, Tesla could be rolling in the dough if they licensed their tech to other companies, rather than hording it for themselves. I'm not sure where you are getting this.. EVs would be at least a decade behind where they are now if it weren't for Tesla. Seriously, Tesla Model S's was the number 1 selling model in the luxury market for several years. There's no way any of the luxury car brands would have started dumping money into EVs if it weren't for Tesla. You can argue "saving the environment" isn't Tesla's goal, but it absolutely is a side effect. As for robot trucks.. Tesla is, again, the one pushing the market with regards to automation. There's no way that Tesla should be advertising their cars as full self-driving, or making it available to the general public right now, but, again.. Tesla is far ahead the other AI vehicle companies. But, again, Telsa's insistence that THEY make the trucks is the issue here. They should really be licensing it out to the major long haul truck manufacturers. You just described a majority of EV cars. There are a few smaller EVs, but the vast majority of them, regardless of manufacturer, are large sedans, cross-overs, and SUVs. This is likely going to continue to be the case until people get used charging their cars at home as there is A LOT of range anxiety among non-EV drivers and you need a larger car to get the 200-300 mile range consumers are demanding for EVs.
Right - their core competency is stuff like batteries. That is fine and great! Again I agree - they should focus on that stuff. I agree about the impact they have had in the market, but much of the hype is around stuff like FSD which seems to be quite far away. Meanwhile competitors are going to churn out cars because that is what they do. Bolded - exactly. This is what the business mostly is.
Okay.. So what was the point of your original post then? You just agreed with my post refuting your points in the original post.
they don’t refute my post I believe Tesla needs to focus on delivery in the core business it’s huge valuation arises at least in part because of hype around FSD etc it has extremely poor corporate governance IMO and that will bite because companies with bad governance end up doing very stupid things
What is the legality of this beta? isn’t the driver simply fully liable for whatever happens so basically you have to be driving? 1598723307741790209 is not a valid tweet id
Normally when you are a test subject you get paid to do so. In this case you are paying for the privilege.
That's because most tests require an incentive to get people to sign up. Tesla, on the other hand, has more people wanting to be a beta tester than they actually need.
Couple Mos. back I rented a Camry that, unknown to me, had collision detection and lane departure warning system. I almost didn't make it off the lot. Attempting to pass or exiting on hwy is fun if you don't have a firm grasp on the steering wheel. The auto braking when on cruise control is another fun experience. Everyone I've spoken with turns all that crap off toot sweet!