Selected World Cup 2022 Referees

Discussion in 'World Cup 2022 - Refereeing' started by SouthRef, May 19, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    You made great points as always, but I rather disagree with this one. Can you name even one or two who deserve it less than Frappart based on their body of work? Ghorbal, Sikazwe, and others have done plenty of matches at continental championships, knockout matches in continental club competitions, important WC qualifiers, etc. With all respect and support, I just don't see how Frappart's international CV gets anywhere near that.

    Also, even "relatively safe" WC games get plenty of attention, and any mistake or controversy is magnified way more than anywhere else. Is FIFA willing to risk putting their female officials in that spot, unless it is a matchday-three dead rubber? That said, I do find it plausible, or even likely, that Frappart and maybe one of the other two will get to whistle a dead rubber.
     
  2. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    That's a fair challenge. To be honest the wording I meant to use was " there are a number of guys also going to the Finals who possibly deserve it even less than her".

    Even that statement, I know, is debateable, but even I have to be "politically correct" at times. :)

    My general point holds, though - there are a number of officials on this list who are nowhere near as good as many who are not on it.

    But, it has always been this way and, alas, it always will be.
     
  3. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    What do you make of the fact that none of them were used in Tokyo, though? If you were paving the way for their use in Qatar, giving them an Olympic men's match seems to have been the easy route--particularly when you (FIFA) went out of your way to announce that as a comprehensive gender-neutral list and not two distinct lists.
     
  4. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    To clarify my point here, for the Olympics in 2021 I thought it was likely a woman would get a men's match because of political factors. Because that didn't occur at the Olympics, it's making me reconsider my initial belief that it will happen in Qatar.

    Everything seems setup for Frappart to do at least one match in Qatar, but it was perfectly set up that way in Tokyo and it didn't happen. So if FIFA didn't take the risk there, why would they here?
     
    Thegreatwar, allan_park and Pierre Head repped this.
  5. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think the issue--and it may be obvious--is that everyone knows the game regarding confederational allocations. CAF's #4 is almost never going to be better than UEFA's #25. Yet we know CAF's #4 is likely going to the World Cup and UEFA's #25 isn't even in the discussion. And you can make a million assertions like that. Heck, many used to make claims that England's #10 would be better than CAF's #1, though recent seasons have likely disabused most of that notion.

    Frappart and the other two female selections come out of nowhere, though, which is what makes things different. With that said, to the extent all three are "extra" allocations and not taking away any actual spots, I guess it doesn't really matter. If those three were not on the list, it doesn't sound like Cerro Grande, Shukrallah and Tessema (to use three likely examples) would have gone in their place. So honestly, from a "they took a spot" argument standpoint or argument, there's really nothing here.

    In my mind, the bigger issue is that FIFA are clearly using these referees as PR props. I know this is easier said than done, but I wonder if there's any instinct from someone like Frappart to essentially call FIFA's bluff and say something like "if you want to showcase me to the world and get all the media benefit, actually put me in a game or I'm not coming."
     
  6. USSF REF

    USSF REF Guest

    HA! That would be something. Just can't see it.
     
  7. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Oh right, it's never happening. She has a WWC Final and other major matches in UEFA I'm sure she still wants to officiate.

    I just wonder about the instinct deep down. I'm sure some (most?) people are simply ecstatic to get a call like this. But there have to be other personalities who would see it in a different light given the totality of it. Probably totally down to individual personality. But we all know we are in a profession where there are big egos at this level. And that might mean there are some feelings below the surface that are a bit different than you'll see expressed in media. But, then again, maybe not.
     
  8. RefIADad

    RefIADad Member+

    United States
    Aug 18, 2017
    Des Moines, IA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    That type of action would be a dictionary definition of “career limiting decision”.

    I’d love to see it as well. Honestly, I think the real litmus test for this will be Nesbitt. As noted earlier, she has worked at the top level of her domestic league and confederation. As much or even more than any of the other female referees there, she has the strongest case to say she is truly there on merit. So if she doesn’t get at least one on-field assignment, it will be pretty clear these appointments are just a PR ploy.
     
  9. gold4278

    gold4278 Member

    Feb 21, 2007
    Houston
    Club:
    Houston Dynamo
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Ma Ning is China's top referee. He has been consistently getting high level ACL and WCQ matches.
     
    Thegreatwar and JasonMa repped this.
  10. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think, all else being equal, the Brazilian AR Neuza Back has the best chance of getting on the field. Brazil has two trios there, so she's part of a team. If Sampaio and Claus both referee matches, then she will work. I find it hard to imagine a scenario where both don't get at least one group match, so she seems a certainty.

    Nesbitt not being tied to a referee is a problem. FIFA would have to create a crew to make it happen, or rotate one of Parker or Atkins out for one of Elfath's matches. Or replace another CONCACAF AR. I think Nesbitt, Frappart and Diaz Medina are all jointly tied for being the second most likely to get on the field. Each of them is in a similar situation where something has to give or change to make it possible. FIFA has to want to make it happen. Maybe that gives Nesbitt and Diaz Medina a leg up over Frappart, because there's less risk and attention on the AR role (particularly with VAR). But as my posts indicate above, I go back and forth on the Frappart question.

    I think the chances of Yamashita or Mukansanga getting on the field are nil.
     
  11. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I actually kind of wonder about a Frappart-Nesbitt-Diaz Medina trio on a dead rubber. If FIFA wanted to really make a statement, I suppose that would be it.
     
    IASocFan, A66C, allan_park and 1 other person repped this.
  12. USSF REF

    USSF REF Guest

    Well, if they REALLY wanted to make a statement, they'd put this crew on the game with some stakes. But, agreed that it would be a statement on any game they did it.

    But, it's not really fair to the officials. Everyone else gets trios and these three get tossed in together "because we have these surplus women"... lame.

    I really would like to see Nesbitt on one of Elfath's games.
     
  13. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    Notwithstanding the fact that, as I said before, the female officials really don't yet have the experience to justify their selection, I do think they will get a game or two in Qatar.

    Maybe I am letting personal opinion cloud my judgement here, but I actually don't think that Kari Seitz would allow three Referees to be selected without some assurance they were going to get a whistle.
     
  14. socal lurker

    socal lurker Member+

    May 30, 2009
    It might make a statement, but could also potentially set back women referees a decade if a cobbled together women’s crew without the appropriate level of experience is in over its head in a WC game that matters.

    While I think it’s great that women can get the opportunity to do men’s games, we’ve seen many referees get on over their head by being pushed above their expertise. I hope the women who were selected are given opportunities where they are able to succeed, not just pushed out for pure optics.
     
  15. Mikael_Referee

    Mikael_Referee Member+

    Jun 16, 2019
    England
    Yes. Lu Jun, aforementioned, wasn't a bad referee, but he wasn't really a good one either. He benefitted, as many from mid-80s to early-noughties in Asian refereeing, from being very athletic and fit when running around the FoP during games. His calls weren't great though.

    Ma Ning is much better. He did well in the tough Iraq vs. UAE qualifier in March which probably won his spot. I'm not completely convinced the Chinese trio will work a game, but if they do, it would be on merit IMO.
     
    Thegreatwar repped this.
  16. A66C

    A66C Member

    N/A
    United States
    Jan 3, 2022
    I don't think Back is part of a team, because Brazil has four more ARs. I believe the crews are
    Raphael Claus, Danilo Simon, Bruno Pires
    Wilton Sampaio, Bruno Boschilia, Rodrigo Figueiredo

    In fact, if you ignore the six women, you can put together 33 trios that all make sense. It seems as if it was a last-minute decision to include the women. Will they be assigned exclusively as 4th/AVAR? Will trios be broken up? Will there be an all-female crew to grab headlines? Anyone's guess, really.
     
  17. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    My fault. I didn’t see all seven names. That definitely changes my assessment.
     
  18. mfw13

    mfw13 Member+

    Jul 19, 2003
    Seattle
    Club:
    Newcastle United FC
    The only reasonably likely dead rubber would be in Group C, if Poland beats Mexico on MD1.

    MD2 sees Poland play Saudi Arabia while Mexico plays Argentina, so it could be a 6-6-0-0 group after that with Argentina & Poland qualified and Mexico and the Saudis eliminated.

    But no other group features the Pot 3 & Pot 4 teams on MD3.
     
    IASocFan repped this.
  19. code1390

    code1390 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 25, 2007
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    There won't be an all women crew on a Saudi game. FIFA isn't trying to make that big of a statement.
     
    JasonMa, SouthRef, IASocFan and 3 others repped this.
  20. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Mexico hasn't missed the second round in a tournament it qualified for (or was allowed to qualify for) since 1978. And Poland has under-performed at almost every recent tournament its been to. Not making any predictions myself, but I think you're going against historical trends and relying too much on FIFA rankings to predict or imply it's "reasonably likely" that Mexico would be eliminated going into MD3.

    On the point, though, there have been 96 MD3 matches since the tournament moved to 32 teams and a top-two progression scheme in 1998. Of those 96 matches, it looks like only 6 were certified dead rubbers, for a rate of 6% or one every tournament (though 2002 and 2010 didn't have any):

    Japan : Jamaica 1998
    Costa Rica : Poland 2006
    Cote d'Ivoire : Serbia & Montenegro 2006
    Spain : Australia 2014
    Egypt : Saudi Arabia 2018
    Panama : Tunisia 2018

    And of those six matches, I think the only match where analysts would have agreed ahead of time that the match was likely to be completely meaningless was Panama-Tunisia. Japan-Jamaica and Egypt-Saudi Arabia deserve honorable mention, but I think some would have predicted Japan or Egypt could have progressed there.

    Looking at this tournament, the best candidate for a dead rubber is probably Canada-Morocco. And I personally wouldn't bet on that.
     
    JasonMa, seattlebeach and IASocFan repped this.
  21. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    To be honest, I don't see a potential dead rubber" on MD3 as being the place we will see the female Referees get their shot, and my information is that at least one, but more likely two of them will get a game.

    I think it is far more likely that they will get a game on MD2 not least as (usually) there is less at stake in these games - and, yes, there are always exceptions to that, often where we don't expect them.

    But, when you look at it, there are quite a number of games that, by WC standards, would be seen as "soft" games, or games where there is not a lot of political pressure, or rivalries of any sort to make things more difficult, such as Canada v Croatia, Belgium v Morocco, Japan v ???, Tunisia v ???, Korea v Ghana, Cameroon v Serbia.

    There are no "easy" games at a WC, and some of these games may well blow up in the Referee's face, but if I was looking to introduce a female Referee into a WC game, I think that set of games offers the most palatable options.
     
    Mikael_Referee repped this.
  22. jarbitro

    jarbitro Member+

    Mar 13, 2003
    N'Djamena, Tchad
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I agree that MD2 is more likely for Frappart. It would require a national association that wouldn't think to use capital to object, or at least in the case of say a NZL/Senegal/Ghana/Cameroon/Peru, I could easily picture their association viewing it as a potential advantage--a team that is outmatched may very well want a referee that is more likely to not give a CMD. Then the other nation (someone like Belgium, Serbia, Croatia, Portugal, NED) that would be wiling to "take one for the team" so to speak. I mean, it is the World Cup, and the FIFA referee committee is bringing them. I think a mistake outside observers sometimes make is assuming that the committee is acting independent of the nations they represent. If there was enough desire w/i the committee to bring women referees, the referee committee knows where that desire is coming from, and I wouldn't be surprised if the nation(s) that pushed it is (are) going to be at least one the countries on the first game with a woman referee (Frappart). Then, depending on how she does, all bets are off. She could easily referee herself into another match where the political calculations somewhat reset based on performance of both her and the teams, or she could referee herself out.
    The harder part to figure out is confederational neutrality.
    Then MD3 is more likely for Yamashita.

    Or if you want to really get into wild speculation and what ifs, how about: Japan/NZL for Frappart, but only if Yamashita was promised a game, possibly on MD3.Crazy talk, I know.
     
  23. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Very interesting. Particularly the "more likely two" aspect. I believe Frappart is a stretch, as we've discussed. But given her appointments in UEFA I can also see it as plausible. I just can't fathom one of the other two being given a whistle, though. I don't understand why FIFA would take that risk (and I say "risk" given the respective resumes of the other two referees), particularly if they are already set on making sure Frappart works. From a PR perspective, one referee working "checks the box," so to speak.

    I hear what you're saying here, but I think most of the MD2 matchups you list here present challenges--either due to the qualification ramifications of the match OR the potential behavior of a given team. For example, from my perspective Cameroon v Serbia and Korea Rep. v Ghana might need some of your top referees to keep a lid on things. And if Canada is going to over-perform (or Croatia under-perform) that MD2 game is everything in that group. The Group D and the Group E matches you cite that will involve the playoff winners are probably the best opportunities, given the other two teams in each group will be favored to progress. But such expectations have been turned upside down at World Cups before.

    You know, from a purely political or public relations standpoint, it might be worth noting that US-England is the matchup where the appointment of a female referee could be most readily accepted. US media would eat it up. And British media would give it great fanfare, which would be sustained post-match so long as England wins, of course.
     
  24. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    I think we are saying the same thing here, and trying to be "politically correct" in doing so. But, the reality is that, with the best intentions in the world, neither of us think that Frappart et al should have a whistle at this WC. But, it looks like at least one of them, and I am hearing "a couple", will.

    If that is the case, and notwithstanding all of the points made above (every game at a WC has the potential to be problematic), I still think that the MD2 games in Group F, and the Japan game on that MD seem like the best option.

    USA v England? That would probably make Kari very happy, but I just don't see it, and I shudder to think what the tabloid section of the British would do with it!
     
  25. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    #75 balu, Jun 7, 2022
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2022
    I think this is far, far too risky. It is a match with an enormous amount of global public attention. Just imagine what the media would do if there were to be a penalty or red card controversy.

    Also, another factor that might be worth keeping in mind is that, no matter how many of the three end up getting the whistle, Frappart is by far the most likely to be the first one. And confederation-wise, this match won’t fit her.
     

Share This Page