It seems to exist entirely for the purpose of having headlines and unread articles shared and re-tweeted.
That's as good of a desription of "journalism" in the 21st Century as I've seen yet. Well, if not "journalism, then it's a great description of the business model for "synergistic multi-platform media enterprises" in the 21st century.
Some cats are definitely dicks, my neighbor’s cat in particular is a violent sociopath. All of my cats have been pretty awesome though, they’ve had their dickish moments but then doesn’t everybody?
We have a cat moved in at our place in summer because he doesn't like his current owner. He spends most of his time asleep or grifting for food, then goes out for a night of violent murder. Sociopathic doesn't really do justice to his lifestyle ...
Dogs don't. At least not by instinct. Sure, they can be trained to be murder machines, but if let to develop normally they will go out of their way to please you.
Live shot of Clarence Thomas and Donald Trump pic.twitter.com/IxfJJmIcFi— J-L Cauvin (@JLCauvin) January 19, 2022
The FBI probably should have sat this one out. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Life’s most persistent and urgent question is, ‘What are you doing for others?’” This #MLKDay2022 and every day, the #FBI remains dedicated to service and committed to protecting our communities. pic.twitter.com/HDpq9iWXWP— FBI (@FBI) January 17, 2022
Mitch McConnell describes Mitch McConnell https://t.co/RZiNvo6ao9— Juan Escalante (@JuanSaaa) January 20, 2022
What is our children learning? Lol. Reminds me of that time two mayoral candidates thought a home in NYC cost $100,000. pic.twitter.com/vCyCcblvpL— Corinne Low (@femonomics) January 20, 2022 Seriously speaking, there's a huge disconnect between the elites and how "real 'Muricans" live, but the worse part is how many of the elites think that their reality reflects that of a majority of Americans, from small family loans to start up businesses, to the median wage, to the cost of life. And that's why in general terms we have a failing democracy, because we have surrendered the wheel to a group of people disconnected from their citizens every day's struggle.
Dafuq? my friend's kid's school in Georgia sent homework with this question pic.twitter.com/pSFhJ0Ucvz— Jennifer C. Martin (@notreallyjcm) January 20, 2022
I don't see the problem. How can we understand historical decisions if we don't understand the motivations of those making those decisions?
Politico is notoriously bad even within the industry. Pod Save America has a Hot Takes Appreciators pisstake where they rank dumb takes on a Politico scale - the worst take being the full Politico Playbook
An ideal assignment would have a follow up in which students write a similar letter advocating on behalf of the Cherokee.
That's not what the exercise is asking the student to do, though. It's asking the student to assume the POV of the settler, not to understand it. Certainly not to analyze it.
That would be less problematic, but I don't see that as being ideal. You could write a thesis on the problematic framing of the question. The fact that the question specifies neither the race nor the gender of the "American settler" should be setting off your alarm bells.
"Ideal" wasn't the ideal word. "Better" might work. I suspect the race and gender questions can be addressed at some point. Blowing up the tweet does show that this is one of a sequence of assignments, so it's possibly decontextualized in order to generate outrage. Or it's outrageous. Hard to tell.
If the instructions don't specify that "American settler" is a euphemism for "white male slaveholder" then it's a big, big problem. I think there's a big difference between asking a student to understand white squatters seeking to expel Indians from land in order to open up slave-based agricultural development, versus asking them to act as such. The notion that we must empathize with bad actors in the past in order to understand them strikes me as fraught with bad consequences, and I doubt it's good pedagogy to boot. If I were teaching children about the Holocaust, I would want them to understand that many ordinary Germans went along with it for reasons which made sense to them at the time, or which at the least they were able to justify to themselves fairly easily. I would not ask them to waste time pretending to be a middle-class German clerk writing a letter to the local authorities informing them that his neighbor is actually a Jew who has been hiding his identity. To quote/paraphrase Vonnegut: we are what we pretend to be. Even putting aside that the exercise in that tweet would require a great deal more study and thought than the average primary or secondary school teacher has to devote to such a complex topic, the act assuming the role of a thoughtlessly racist aspiring slaveowner justifying ethnic cleansing will likely teach a 'lesson' that's implicit in the psychological process needed to fulfill the assignment.