No. He implied Republicans were going to pay at election time for their Schiavo position. I merely pointed out that other predictions that Republicans would pay for their stances at the polls have never panned out.
That's not a bad analysis. However, what Loney was saying was that he hoped they kept harping on it up to election time.
Look, Im insisting this thread is still alive when we all know its been dead for years. Id just like to point out how the same segment of society demanded no resources be spared on the must be assumed alive Teri Schaivo are the same ones today balancing business interests with mortality rates.
Wow. A virtual brain trust of center-right nonsense. ITN, Ian McCracken, and Attacking Minded, all in full force (or farce, as the case may be) here.
Necro threads are like watching an old video of a family reunion where the drunk uncle spouts non-stop Wingnut nonsense before passing out face-first in the Costco sheet cake.
Out of curiosity, I went back just one page here. The main discussion was about the political consequences, with the usual suspects arguing that the their stance would help or at least not hurt the GOP. Well, the next congressional election was 2006, in which the Republicans lost something like 60 seats and their majority.