But it should be taken seriously though right? Nobody should be asking how she was dressed, why she was there, or how promiscuous she might be.....
It doesn't matter, because there's literally no corroborative evidence, has been out for a year, and no one in MSM - who have been doing an excellent job of taking down predators, I mean not even Ronan Farrow tracked this down - thought it newsworthy. It does not matter. This a BernieBro wet dream
Holy sh!t, is this the fvcking SAT???? Fine here you go.... Fingering women who don't want to be fingered, very bad. Did I pass the test??????
Yup. True colors. Opposed to the Trumpian slide into stupidity and fascism. 100% on the right side of history. I sleep well at night.
I called it a troubling allegation. I didn’t make any comment about her personally, so don’t try to attach that shit to me. I suspect there is a reason that this has appeared in fringe media at this point. Because more responsible outlets are likely doing their jobs right now checking into the validity of the accusations. I have more than a 30 second attention span and I am content to wait for a few days while this plays itself out. I will repeat, however, that if the allegation is true, then like Kavanaugh and like Franken, additional women will come forward with new allegations. If true, Biden didn’t do this once. If no one else comes forward, that is certainly evidence to be used in testing the credibility of this woman. By the way, she does claim that she has been trying to tell this story for years. That may be. I’m curious why Republican oppo research didn’t pick this up and run with it in 2008 or 2012.
FFS. Stop with the neo-liberal shit. It's a stupid attack and, honestly, completely negates any comment you make. the "neoliberals" are why the Democrats won the midterm election and are why the Democrats have a chance of beating Trump in November. The amount of ignorance spewing from you right now is just mind boggling.
I've always been part of the democratic wing of the democratic party. History proves that safe choices do not lead to victory.
Like Obama in 2008, who was endorsed by the establishment. Or Clinton in 1992. Or LBJ in 1964. Or Kennedy in 1960. Or Truman and FDR five times. But aside from them, the establishment, safe choices lose all the time.
Churchill walked across the bridge holding Uncle Joe Stalin's hand. There are times when purism is just plain stupid. Whether this is one of those times ... hmmm. I could make a wartime analogy and talk about how many lives will be lost due to purism if the current buffoon holds the Presidency. Or that might be getting carried away. Anyway, I don't think being noble in this instance is as easy at it seems. It would be a lot easier to be so if facing President Romney.