well there was no high line and vs Dutch we had 7 defensive players we didn't play that many vs Mexico. you do remember that the WC we were basically playing only 1-2 players behind and everyone else was attacking. Hummels/Boa complained about how ridiculous it was too.
Add Matthaus as another ex German player who advocates for Selke for NT. https://www.90min.de/posts/6329058-selke-einer-fuer-die-nationalmannschaft-matthaeus-koennte-passen
Agreed .... Germany were also Lucky and come one Holland is not that good Either We should always be the best and currently that means we should see How we do against England , France , Spain and Belgium .
what's interesting is Game 1 vs France in NL when we played 4 at the back we ended up with 0-0. Game 2 vs France in NL when we played 5 at the back we ended up losing 2-1. just feels like we aren't good at playing 5 at the back it usually barely barely works too. I mean all those defenders and DM too and we still concede goals....
WhT do you guys think if Matheus said ? He says Germany is missing a true 9 And loew should call up davie selke.
Yes but at the World Cup we played 4-2-3-1 and that definitely did not work anymore I still think a 5-3-2 or 4-3-3 is probably a better option .... With the 5-3-2 I think we did okaish must admit both Dutch Goals was due to the fact that they could not clear the ball properly Would love to see Klopp take over one day
Agree the problem at the WC was not the 4 at the back but the entire defensive shape/strategy The team pressed high but didn't close down properly There was no control of central midfield - e.g Khedira sparking the first goal with loss of possession so then he is out of position Kimmich far too high with net result Ozil is trying to defend the breakaway as right back No 6 screening the CBs Complete lack of running as a unit vs 2014
It's logical.Defense starts with the attack. When you sacrifice attacking options for more defensive ones you call upon yourself to be pressured defensively.
We won Confed with a back 5 throughout. We just need to field a Stindl or Kruse in attack together with players actually playing the system more often then it can work quite well. Plus, Koeman admitted he didnt know how this system would eventually play out which is why we dominated in the first half. We can field anything between the systems and thats an advantage any given day
yeah we got overrun in 2nd half vs you guys pretty much because too many defensive players. it's why I don't like 5 at the back.
I think Boa got worse from the 2 mostly due to injury issues. And although we bring up Torunarigha he's been injury prone all season.
Yeah - they were such a great partnership in how their skills fitted together but I think the injuries really robbed him of his X factor Maybe also he just couldn't quite be arsed to fight back from it
Does the @DFB_Team_EN need an out-and-out No9? @LMatthaeus10 has his say... pic.twitter.com/jn0zgkXncg— DW Sports (@dw_sports) March 26, 2019
Same thing with Sule at Bayern. He routinely has 90% or better pass accuracy but his passes are all sideways and back to the keeper.
I think Löw has been spoiled by how good they were. He got away with playing 2 CBs 50 meters from goal with no support and it only started to fail when they aged and lost pace.
Except from the fact that his two "mistakes" were on Liverpool's goals - otherwise great, better than Süle I'd say Remember Boateng in Euro 16? He was ridiculous good back then - it's too unfortunate about their injuries because Boateng/Hummels should've been in their prime last year at the WC. Hummels basically the same player though, I'd say
Are we really discussing Hummels and Boateng's game against Mexico? Lol, you see any defender, no matter how good they are, will struggle in a 2v1 situation - and those situations happened numerous times against poor Mats and Boa - they didn't stand a chance However sometimes we saw 3 Mexico players against Hummels or Boa lol What's awful is that I feel like Löw's mistakes seems to have costed Hummels and Boa their NT careers
Selke is a new Jancker, don't want that type of player. Werner and probably Stindl is fine, the first excells in a functional team, no worries about that. Then we have the likes of Waldschnidt, Arp, Eggestein etc. coming through. One of them will fit.
U still need a tall, physical striker in your roster. One or two U wanna have more options. Sometimes when opponents parked their buses, u need to have different options to score goals Not just combination player or technical player. Some physicality inside the box might help Yea, Loew used Goretzka in th more advanced role n interchange with Gnabry/Sane so he has more time inside the penalty box or as a frontman Maybe Loew sees the need of having more variety inside the penalty box too. But a Selke or Fullkrug won’t hurt I don’t rate Werner, needs too much space. More like a counter attack player. When opponents parked the bus n we couldn’t untie the deadlock, Werner isn’t one An important attribute for strikers is ALWAYS the ability to win duels, or aerial duels. In tight space, u need to be exceptionally technical and physical to create or to score. Being Either just technical or physical won’t work, u need both Werner is lacking a bit on both sides. We need players who can cause danger in tighter space Volland, Selke, Weydandt maybe