Penalties, part two.

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by 655321, Sep 21, 2002.

  1. 655321

    655321 New Member

    Jul 21, 2002
    The Mission, SF
    Who should take them??
     
  2. Lanky134

    Lanky134 New Member

    Oct 25, 1999
    134, 3, 6
    Murphy or Gerrard, and not just because they're on my fantasy team.

    Dave
     
  3. Depending upon who's on
    the pitch at the time:

    1. Murphy;
    2. Gerrard;
    3. Riise.
     
  4. scouseratheart

    scouseratheart New Member

    Jul 2, 2002
    USA
    Henchoz should take them
     
  5. LiverpoolFanatic

    Liverpool FC, Philadelphia Union
    Feb 19, 2000
    Lancaster, PA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    That might be the only chance he'd get at scoring. :)
     
  6. scouseratheart

    scouseratheart New Member

    Jul 2, 2002
    USA
    i want to see him try one from half-field
     
  7. SMP420

    SMP420 New Member

    Sep 16, 2002
    north hollywood
    Right now it would be Murphy.He's on fire
     
  8. Flying Weasel

    Flying Weasel Member

    Mar 22, 2001
    Harrisburg, PA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Owen set to keep spot kick role

    From Soccernet.com
    http://www.soccernet.com/england/news/2002/0924/20020924lfcowenpen.html

    Gerard Houllier today confirmed that Michael Owen will remain the club's first choice penalty taker despite his miss against West Bromwich Albion at the weekend.

    Houllier said: 'If we get a penalty against Basle then Michael will take it if he wants to. It's as simple as that.'
     
  9. 655321

    655321 New Member

    Jul 21, 2002
    The Mission, SF
    Re: Owen set to keep spot kick role

    Well, that's absolutely f*#king insane.
     
  10. Lanky134

    Lanky134 New Member

    Oct 25, 1999
    134, 3, 6
    ERIF REILLUOH!

    Dave
     
  11. 655321

    655321 New Member

    Jul 21, 2002
    The Mission, SF
    What in the hell does this mean??
     
  12. Lanky134

    Lanky134 New Member

    Oct 25, 1999
    134, 3, 6
    It's "Fire Houllier" backwards (though not technically. "Houllier" should come first). I should explain. Last year on the DC boards, there was so much "Fire Rongen" talk that it was clogging any sort of normal discussion, prompting complaints. So, every time Rongen did something people didn't agree with (such as breathe) some people took to writing it backwards.

    And no, I don't think GH should be fired...

    Dave
     
  13. 655321

    655321 New Member

    Jul 21, 2002
    The Mission, SF
    Well, he's absolutely wrong about this. Michael could be scoring a hat trick in every match this season, and still not be worthy of taking penalties. What in the hell is going on over there? This is ridiculous.
     
  14. Lanky134

    Lanky134 New Member

    Oct 25, 1999
    134, 3, 6
    Purely motivational technique. He's got to show Michael that he believes he can do it.

    Dave
     
  15. 655321

    655321 New Member

    Jul 21, 2002
    The Mission, SF
    I don't care. After awhile, enough is enough. Even when he was on fire with finishing, he was a crummy penalty taker. For Houllier to not allow much more qualified penalty takers to get us goals when we are having a hard time finishing off matches is just stupid. I don't agree with him on this and I doubt anything will change my mind.
     
  16. That’s right; it is a motivational technique. I don’t agree with it, though.

    First, Owen is 6/12 lifetime in the Premiership in PKs—that’s lifetime, including those times when everything he touched from open play flew into the net.

    As for motivation, I don’t think Michael needs it—last I saw, he was leading the Prem in shots on goal—a total of eighteen through last Saturday’s play

    Murphy should take the PKs. Wish I could vote twice.


    .
     

Share This Page