After NYCFC, what's the priority for MLS?

Discussion in 'MLS: General' started by CBusCrew12, May 23, 2013.

?

What is MLS' priority post-NYCFC announcement?

  1. Relocating Chivas USA

    43 vote(s)
    39.4%
  2. Helping DC United, New England, and Columbus get their own/new stadiums

    35 vote(s)
    32.1%
  3. Investing in youth development

    12 vote(s)
    11.0%
  4. Raising the quality of play

    11 vote(s)
    10.1%
  5. Other (specify)

    8 vote(s)
    7.3%
  1. CBusCrew12

    CBusCrew12 Member

    Apr 19, 2005
    Ohio, USA
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Pretty simple...where does MLS put its focus now?
     
  2. UpstateFan

    UpstateFan Member

    Apr 19, 2010
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    League wide SSSs.
     
    LouisianaViking07/09 repped this.
  3. TX Bill

    TX Bill Member+

    Apr 3, 2006
    Sugar Land TX
    Club:
    Everton FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Other:

    Raise quality of officiating. Hasn't improved while league play has.
     
  4. krudmonk

    krudmonk Member+

    Mar 7, 2007
    S.J. Sonora
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    No option for merely rebranding Chivas?

    C.F. Clippers?
     
    redinthemorning repped this.
  5. jond

    jond Member+

    Sep 28, 2010
    Club:
    Levski Sofia
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Fixing the failing franchises. Stop expanding while ignoring the cellar dwellers. After all, in a single entity, parity driven league you're only a strong as your weakest links. And all the attention on NY while not solving NE, Chi, Chivas, Colo, Columbus, Tor, DCU I'm not sure helps the league as a whole.

    NY2 can be a huge positive, but the negativity in a number of markets can be negative overall. MLS won't be nearly what it can be until a number of the markets already in the league are fixed. Expanding simply ignores that.
     
  6. deejay

    deejay Member+

    Feb 14, 2000
    Tarpon Springs, FL
    Club:
    Jorge Wilstermann
    Nat'l Team:
    Bolivia
    TV contract baby!
     
    GVPATS77 repped this.
  7. thomas19064

    thomas19064 Member+

    Apr 29, 2008
    Delco
    Club:
    Philadelphia Union
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    instead of Rebranding or Relocating or whatever, the option should just be "Fixing" Chivas USA..... be it rebrand, new ownership, relocate, new stadium, whatever... it is the leagues weakest link and it needs to be fixed one way or anther.
     
  8. Mstars96

    Mstars96 Member

    Jul 13, 2003
    NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    NE doesnt care about a stadium, Columbus has one.
    The league can deal with 20 priorities, kill Chivas is a big priority, salary is one, DC stadium, development of talent and keeping it, TV deal, more merchandizing.....
     
  9. ImaPuppy

    ImaPuppy Member+

    Aug 10, 2009
    Using too many parentheses
    Club:
    Houston Dynamo
    Nat'l Team:
    American Samoa
    TV contract, because I doubt NBCSN is going to renew once that deal is over.

    We MUST get more viewership and bigger deals, its top priority.
     
    GVPATS77 repped this.
  10. FuzzyForeigner

    Oct 29, 2003
    WA
    Club:
    Seattle
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    build some terraces mate!
     
    Zoti and Kappa74 repped this.
  11. TerminusFooty

    TerminusFooty Member+

    Feb 4, 2012
    Club:
    Atlanta Silverbacks
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Southeast
     
    xbhaskarx repped this.
  12. looknohands

    looknohands Member+

    Apr 23, 2009
    Louisville, KY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  13. TerminusFooty

    TerminusFooty Member+

    Feb 4, 2012
    Club:
    Atlanta Silverbacks
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    They are up renegotiation for 2015 and beyond. Current contracts expire after 2014 (thus the NYCFC start date). They will try to use this new team as leverage since they can't use their current ratings.
     
  14. ImaPuppy

    ImaPuppy Member+

    Aug 10, 2009
    Using too many parentheses
    Club:
    Houston Dynamo
    Nat'l Team:
    American Samoa
    fillmont repped this.
  15. staafros

    staafros Member

    May 22, 2013
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Chivas USA should relocate to Orlando right now! Orlando City SC has higher attendances than MLS side Chivas USA, they deserve it and Florida deserves it. Florida is by far the most populated state without a MLS team. Orlando City already has attendances above 10,000 and they might get an average attendance around 30,000 at the Citrus Bowl. They can built a soccer stadium later, like New York City FC (Yankee Stadium).
     
    DaveBrett and MuzzaFC repped this.
  16. superdave

    superdave Member+

    Jul 14, 1999
    VB, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    States are political units, NOT economic units.
     
  17. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    Technically no MLS team plays in the state of New York (yet). :D
     
    redinthemorning, Zoti and Arsenalkid700 repped this.
  18. aztec21bas

    aztec21bas BigSoccer Supporter

    Jun 24, 2009
    Mullica Hill, NJ
    Club:
    Philadelphia Union
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Now that NYCFC is happening the league definitely needs to prioritize their next moves. First up needs to be securing a new lucrative TV contract. That has to be top priority as the end of the current contract is looming. The monies derived from TV can further the league agenda on other priorities. Shoring up the weaker links must be next. Whether that means getting DCU and NER favorable stadium situations, preferably their own SSS, or rebranding/relocating Chivas does not matter. These issues should be considered as priorty #2a and #2b, as they are of equal importance. As a poster said upthread, MLS is only as strong as their weakest link. Priority #3 is investing even more into youth/player development. Better academy programs and a revised, more comprehensive reserve league are a must. Ideally, I'd like to see more concrete affiliations with USL, where clubs become more of a minor league affiliate such as is done in baseball, with each team supporting their own USL or NASL team. Priority #4 would then take care of itself in elevating the level of play. Lastly, Priority #5 must be expanding MLS's footprint. While 20 teams is an ideal size for European leagues and also for scheduling purposes, it is really too small a number for a bi-national league. There are a few regions that are not adequately covered by MLS. A team or teams in the southeast is a must. It does not matter where, but the league needs to look at adding at least two teams from Atlanta, Miami, Orlando, Charlotte, Raleigh-Durham, and/or Richmond. They also need to expand in the midwest. Ultimately, 32 is too big, but either 24 or 28 as the goal would work quite well.
     
    Pcp Yoko repped this.
  19. Flex Buffchest

    Jan 25, 2010
    Orange County, California
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd rather not see sky blue as the kit color. :sick: But what can you do. :(
     
  20. jaykoz3

    jaykoz3 Member+

    Dec 25, 2010
    Conshohocken, PA
    Club:
    Philadelphia Union
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Priority #1 - New Lucrative Media Rights deals (TV, Internet, Mobile). Nothing else matters right now, as this will help drive the League for years to come.

    Priority #2 - Player and Youth Development. This has already been started, but it needs to be ramped up. The USL partnership needs to be deepened, with MLS Clubs either running their own USL Clubs (or sudo reserve teams) or having stronger ties with an existing USL Affiliate Club. Would also love to see Residency Academies start to take shape.

    Priority #2A - Continue and strengthen the initiatives started this season to get better officials in USSF and the CSA.

    Priority #3 - Get the Chivas Situation cleaned up. Find a new local owner who will re-brand the Club, move them into their own SSS in another part of the greater LA Area and just plain right this sinking ship.

    Priority #4 - Shore up the middling teams. Help get DCU's Stadium situation taken care of. They desperately need a new home, the original league standard bearer deserves so much better then the crumbling relic that is RFK. Continue helping the Hunt's shore up and grow The Crew and FC Dallas. Convince the Krafts to get the Revs into their own SSS. Put pressure on Keystone Sports to bring in another investor who will be willing to spend some money on the Union.

    Priority #5 - Determine what will eventually be the ideal number of teams for MLS, and then systematically start to fill in the gaps. Miami or OCSC? What about Atlanta, Charlotte, Phoenix, Minneapolis, San Antonio? Maybe another Canadian team? I'm not an expert, but Charlotte, Atlanta, & Minneapolis make the most sense from a business standpoint. All 3 cities have big corporations based in them (potential corporate sponsors). Minneapolis and Atlanta are known Internationally as well. Miami makes a lot of sense because it's viewed as a destination place, and stars want to go there. Orlando has the fans, and a strong owner and looks to potentially be a good addition. They could be a Portland like success, or fall into the doldrums like The Crew and The Revs. Not sure of the ambitions of San Antonio's Owner, but they could make a great addition to the league. As far as Canada, maybe Calgary, to give Vancouver a Canadian Rival. Possibly Ottawa?
     
  21. looknohands

    looknohands Member+

    Apr 23, 2009
    Louisville, KY
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm going to disagree on this part. Although it'd be great for the league to milk their next contract for all that it's worth, I believe it's much more important for them to pick the right partner moving forward. Just as we saw with the move from FSC to NBCS, it may be wiser to take less money up front if the network partner has a genuine interest in promoting the league and making it a showpiece. ESPN can offer the best ratings, NBCS (so far) has offered the best promotion and a darkhorse such as BeIN could potentially offer the most cash. The league would be smart to weigh the relative advantages of each offer.
     
  22. SoCalYid

    SoCalYid Member+

    Jun 11, 2011
    BigSoccer :)
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Caring about existing teams would help.

    So new stadiums for DC United, New England and Columbus........ and move Chivas to Orlando.
     
    Flex Buffchest repped this.
  23. TerminusFooty

    TerminusFooty Member+

    Feb 4, 2012
    Club:
    Atlanta Silverbacks
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Lol! (Cough cough.)

    Seriously, I would hope those situations would be a priority - but I'm not sure they are (nor are they that easy to solve).
     
  24. The 92nd Fish

    The 92nd Fish Member

    Jan 16, 2007
    London, England
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    Vancouver doesn't need a 'Canadian' rival, it already has Seattle and Portland, both are which are far closer to it than Calgary. You've seen all the Canadian markets that MLS is going to have.
     
  25. TerminusFooty

    TerminusFooty Member+

    Feb 4, 2012
    Club:
    Atlanta Silverbacks
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This business of assigning rivals is a bit ridiculous anyways. I find the rivalries that have developed organically over time much more interesting (Galaxy v Earthquakes, RedBull v DC Untied, etc.).
     

Share This Page