12th Fixture: November 20, 2011 - Chelsea FC v. Liverpool FC [R]

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by I-Got-The-BLUES, Nov 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. addicted2chelsea

    Nov 11, 2007
    Australia
    Ok its sinked in a little bit.

    Our recent form is frankly shocking. That performance at Bolton really had me thinking we were starting to get into it.

    I wont bother commenting on Mikels error or the Mikel police (aka Okocha :p ) will come around , but yeah. It wasnt good.

    I fully stand by AVB still , he has got alot of talent and im afraid to say its going to take more than 12 games and 1 transfer window to get this team going.

    Abit of calm around these boards could go a long way , but having watched the replay and seen the benches reaction to the 2nd goal , I wouldnt want to be in that dressingroom to say the least.
     
  2. Naughtius Maximus

    Jul 10, 2001
    Shropshire
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    Bane's been consistent at full-back but Luiz continues to make poor decisions. Today, he tried to dribble through 3 players, 5 yards outside his own box instead of just getting rid of it and recently he's clattered players in the back giving away, (albeit rather soft), penalties.

    JT gave away the ball the entire day? You must have been watching a different match to me because I didn't see that particularly although I accept he lost it once or twice bringing it out. He's not as good as he was but, as you've already said, the main problem is the system with a high line, very little pressure on the ball, (so allows the other sides midfield to pick a pass), which almost guarantees that teams will be able to play the ball in behind us.

    But I think the nub of the issue, (apart from the aforementioned tactics), is the attitude and motivation that the team start games with which is far too relaxed and lackadaisical. The main question we need to ask after this game is, why do we need to go behind in the first half and the guys THEN 'need a talking to', (that's what one of the fellas said after the match), to put some life into them.
     
  3. Lamps>Gerrard

    Lamps>Gerrard Member

    Feb 15, 2009
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    For all this "we need to sell so and so" "we need to buy buy buy," our team wasn't this bad under Carlo after our "bad moment" with him, and with an arguably weaker team.

    My point? I'm not really sure tbh but AVB hasn't helped this team one bit, and the players are just not playing.
     
  4. Yaroni

    Yaroni Member

    Aug 31, 2007
    Tel Aviv
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Israel
    At this point id take sturridges pace, goals and drive over maloudas slow, predicable and backward possession.

    Hes supposed to be a winger not a CM, and if he plays like a CM at least tuck him behind studge/mata where he isn't sucking the life out of our attack.
     
  5. jcm28

    jcm28 Member

    Apr 12, 2009
    Puerto Rico
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Puerto Rico
    AVB needs to start Sturridge every game and give Romeu and even Josh more minutes. Give these guys who have more to prove some time to play, and im sure they will show more enthusiasm than the ones who already have showed their worth.
     
  6. addicted2chelsea

    Nov 11, 2007
    Australia
    Agreed. AVB wants that tiki-taka Barca movement. Oriol is a perfect example of what he wants in there. Im not throwing Mikel under the bus at all but I think Oriol could begin to be better suited in that position.
     
  7. Dtrip77

    Dtrip77 Member+

    Jun 10, 2009
    N NJ!!!
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    frustrating to say the least....

    Although im not surprised at some of the comments on here, i don't believe AVB is the problem with this team. Yes, he is playing a high line tactic that our defense is seeming to have a difficulty with but we are just not producing any threatening attacks nor covering each others spaces. This start off jogging mentality in the fist half and full on attack for the first 15min in the second is not working. Not sure what is needed or missing but Danny has been our most threatening force up top. Not saying much, cause once he scored he disappeared for the rest of the game. New hungry blood might be needed and thats an understatement in regards to Malouda's position.
     
  8. LuckyDay

    LuckyDay New Member

    Jul 6, 2011
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    I just think that there are too many players who are past their prime or that were never good enough but got carried by great players in their prime like Terry, Lampard and Drogba.

    Out of yesterday's side I would say that Ivanovic, Terry (on current form), Luiz (as a CB), Ramires, Mikel and Malouda are not good enough for a side with title hopes.
     
  9. ComeOnChelsea

    ComeOnChelsea Member

    Jan 18, 2007
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    I was shocked when I saw the starting lineup. How could Sturridge not be starting over Malouda? WTF does Malouda do to warrant always starting and playing a full 90 when he does?

    The timing of bringing AVB in was one year too soon. He has come in and wanted to put his stamp on his team, but he simply doesn't have the ingredients he needs for his style. At some point he has to play with the cards he has and adjust his style of play to suit the players we have.

    The most concerning thing to me is how rarely we even challenge the opposing keeper. I keep reading how AVB's system is all about attacking, but we hardly even generate shots. It's sad

    I thought we were starting to really show something before Torres picked up that red card when we were using a Mata-Torres-Sturridge front 3. What happened to that? This squad really needed another Mata/Modric player to work
     
  10. fernb8

    fernb8 Member+
    Staff Member

    Aug 12, 2002
    excellent point

    okocha has touched on this subject before with several insightful posts and I certainly agree with him.

    While it may be strange to focus on the attack when we seem to conceed such silly goals a great part of the problem at the back is directly related to what occurs up front. We have a combination of players who are either far too passive in possession or far too wasteful in possession and this creates an unbalanced field for our players to defend. I would also add that this is why we are seeing the struggles from the fullbacks as we are far too reliant on them to provide width as the two wide players in the front three are far too often not doing their respective jobs.

    Just think about what we are asking Ashley Cole to do-

    run corner flag to corner flag for 90s mins while not making a mistake on either end, stopping all 1 vs 1 situations he is placed in, dropping in to help the central two when the opposition has a numerical advantage while running at us (this occurs quite often btw), and making numerous recovery runs to not only his flank but to cover as one of the last defenders. No wonder Bos struggles in this current system.

    back to the issues with the front players and when I say front players I am primarily focusing on the two wide men in the front three. They are either too passive which means the opposition has stopped, or slowed down, our respective attack or break as the play is too possession oriented or is too slow and the opposition now has two banks of players in front of our attack. This usually leads to the ball being played in front of, and away from, the danger areas or the areas where we are most likely to score. When the opposition wins the ball back our fullbacks are usually quite high up the field providing the width or the option which our front players do not and thus when possession in conceeded a counter can be launched with two to three attacking players against three to four of our defenders (and considering two of those four are usually either a little slower or just dont feel like getting back) then in theory it is almost a numbers up situation for the opposition on the majority of their counter attacks.

    we also suffer from players who are very wasteful with possession- those who dribble into blind alleys, or take on a negative shot from a when teammates are better positioned, or those who seem to have no concept of the weight of a pass. These players also create an issue because the opposition has now quickly gained possession back and can play the ball into the open space vacated by the fullback, central defender, holding mid. Again this usually leads to a numbers up attack for the opposition and eventually if you give a team in the Prem enough chances being numbers up they are going to score.

    So where does the solution lie- atm we really only have one attacking player who seems to understand the difference between making possession first and risk/chance opportunities is Mata. He really seems to understand when to lay the ball off on a five yard square pass and when to take an opponent on and unless we can clone three more of him I really do think we have to change our tactical approach for now

    AVB should bin the 433 for now until he can get the right players for the system and adopt some type of four man midfield with two strikers. The fullbacks are providing the width regardless so why waste a player selection on a front three system which only creates problems and is largely ineffective. Personally I would prefer a 4312 with Mata given a free role behind the front two where he pop in and out of space and up on either flank. This would allow him to become a vital cog in the attack where I believe he would help us maintain possession when needed and take chances when presented. This system also allows both Danny and Anelka to play their much more prefered central roles where they imo would be much more effective.
     
  11. Dtrip77

    Dtrip77 Member+

    Jun 10, 2009
    N NJ!!!
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    great post!

    My concern is that AVB seems reluctant to change his formation of choice. Why? i dont know but wasn't he switching between formations in the first few games to suit the players we had on the pitch/bench. What happened to that?
     
  12. Yaroni

    Yaroni Member

    Aug 31, 2007
    Tel Aviv
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Israel
    were going to need more than just mata, who else on our team can hold the ball and make intelligent runs in the final third

    it sucks when none of our forwards now what to do in and around the box
     
  13. addicted2chelsea

    Nov 11, 2007
    Australia
    Excellent post Fern.

    I completely agree with the formation change to a 4312. Mata roaming around behind the strikers would be perfect of him , and give Sturridge the opportunity to play abit more centrally , and get in with his left foot. Sturridge and Mata are the only ones out there that can produce something out of nothing.

    I would love to see more of Meireles as well. Nonetheless , AVB has alot to do , and we have a particularly busy schedule coming up.
     
  14. fernb8

    fernb8 Member+
    Staff Member

    Aug 12, 2002
    it does seem strange

    in Carlo we had a manager who would stubbornly stick to the same 15 or so players and more less send out the same team but showed flexibility with the systems

    with AVB we have a manager who seems fine with rotating players and using the squad, but is stuck on forcing them into the one tactical system

    it really is a huge problem and sadly for AVB- it is something we have failed to address for several seasons now. Lets hope that starts to change immediately.

    cheers

    dont get me wrong because I do think playing this high line is not helping things and not all of the problems are on the attack, but our poor decision making and play up front is leading to far too many opposing counters.

    I would also like to see Miereles and Ramires in the lineup as they have the legs and energy to press the opposition to get the ball back while making intellgent runs on attack.
     
  15. Cris 09

    Cris 09 Trololololo

    Nov 30, 2004
    Westfalenstadion
    Club:
    Borussia Dortmund
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    [​IMG]

    Interesting facts but they don't mean all that much. Carlo had a melt down in mid season last season and Scolari, though he had a great start...just lost it from there. I would not read to much into it but interesting none the less.

    Hopefully AVB will be able to improve on form. I really want him to make it and hope for a long term manager here for once.
     
  16. Dtrip77

    Dtrip77 Member+

    Jun 10, 2009
    N NJ!!!
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    see its not as if we're playing like complete crap.... we are moving the ball around better then last year, just the players are not getting behind into open spaces as much. Plus the obvious mistakes that has cost us most of these games. I'm no were near panic mode although I have written off the PL title at this point. Would be amazed if they were close the gap.

    Also....i see that we have pretty much zero through balls into the box (mainly due to no runs as well) but the times we do have an exciting pass the receiving player isn't expecting it and usually fluffs on the occasion. Very frustrating to watch at times.
     
  17. fernb8

    fernb8 Member+
    Staff Member

    Aug 12, 2002
    sky has been spouting this all day as well

    among many factors which are ignored by this analysis are that the Premiership is just slightly different now as opposed to when Jose was about and the fact that to the best of my memory we have not played the same exact twelve opponents over that time period either
     
  18. Wrath

    Wrath Member+

    May 4, 2007
    New York
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    I still feel AVB is the best man for us. We need coaching stability. Lets not call for his head. Just hope he learns from his mistakes.
     
  19. SwissBlue

    SwissBlue Member

    Apr 26, 2009
    Fribourg
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    My impression of the state of things with CFC is that AVB wants to play a particular style of football, high defensive line, continous movement from his personnel on the pitch, one-touch passing, a la Barça. Unfortunately he simply does not have the players to execute this way of playing.

    AVB has obviously had some guarantees from tptb. For me he is trying to make a point to everybody that the way he wants to play and the players he has at his disposal do not cut it. Personally I would like to see him succeed, even if that means the likes of JT, Mikel, Malouda, Kalou, Drogba, Lampard, and yes, Cech, leaving the club.

    Cech has been poor these last few months. No command of the penalty area, poor positioning, and was responsible for two of Arsenal's goals. Mikel is not a top PL dm; way too static, no vision, and cost us big time on Sunday. Luiz in his place, please, as I've been saying for years. JT cannot play the way AVB wants - way too slow these days. I think he fell over as the easiest option when Malouda made that horrible backpass against the Gunners. Frankie is fighting the fading of the light, Drogba has been engulfed in darkness, and I think everybody agrees that Malouda and Kalou simply don't do it anymore.

    Harsh ? Yes, but if we want to move on under AVB we need big changes. Viva la revolucion !

    EDIT : Ashley Cole ? Is he still the best LB in the PL ? Hmmm...
    'Watching Spurs v. Villa - Modric is playing well...hoping he'll still be ours..
     
  20. nicephoras

    nicephoras A very stable genius

    Fucklechester Rangers
    Jul 22, 2001
    Eastern Seaboard of Yo! Semite
    Yes, the only problem is that Sturridge is awful on the wing! He also plays there like a striker - witness his ridiculous shot yesterday when well placed.

    If we didn't care about finishing 4th, sure, why not. I do. And if we care about that, we can't just let Sturridge play out wide.

    I don't think AVB wants tiki-taka - I think he wants a more aggressive approach on the wings, which we're not capable of providing right now.

    1. We're not adapting well to new tactics...which isn't AVB's fault?
    2. We're not playing well enough tactically.......which isn't AVB's fault?
    3. Sturridge is our most threatening player? On what planet?

    1. Malouda plays out wide over Sturridge because he's better there than Sturridge. Sturridge poaches goals. That's great when it happens, but it's not enough from a supposedly wide player.
    2. Why doesn't AVB tinker with his formation? I can't understand it for the life of me.
    3. Before clamoring for more Matas, how about the one we have play better? He didn't do shit all day yesterday.

    That never happened. He announced to the entire world that he'd be using a 4-3-3.

    It would help if Mata did that yesterday.

    Has there been evidence that he's learning from his mistakes?

    If you buy a new house and are thinking of remodeling it, would you destroy every support beam at once or would you do it over time?
     
  21. Portugeezer!

    Portugeezer! Member

    Jun 8, 2005
    Raynham, MA
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Portugal
    How about more importantly, the players learn from their mistakes and get their heads out of their asses? And play for the god damn shirt, which i could count on one hand at the moment.

    AVB was brought in to rebuild the squad and change the way we play. If roman wanted us to play 90's style boring football he would have kept Carlo. These players need to get with the program or get the f*** out!
     
  22. Portugeezer!

    Portugeezer! Member

    Jun 8, 2005
    Raynham, MA
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Portugal
    thats complete utter bullshit!!!
     
  23. Yaroni

    Yaroni Member

    Aug 31, 2007
    Tel Aviv
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Israel
    Say what you will about Sturridge, but hes getting goals whereas Malouda isn't, not in goals, assists... hes doing nothing.

    At this point, hes our most dangerous forward, Dider and Nando are the only 2 other forwards that have played and they've sucked so far.

    If your argument is that Sturridge can be used better, in another system the coach refuses to play then i agree, but so far hes done more than fine considering our form as of late.
     
  24. Naughtius Maximus

    Jul 10, 2001
    Shropshire
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    That was something I was going to mention as well.

    At certain points in most of the games this season we've been terrific. In this game, once they ran out of steam. we were all OVER them and should have gone on to win the match so, to my mind, that PROVES that there's nothing basically wrong with the players. In fact, in most of our losses, it's come down to individual errors that has cost us.

    Even in games like the Arsenal 5-3 loss we were on top for significant parts of the match but we couldn't convert our pressure into goals and then a blunder from one player costs us, another goal coming right at the end when we're chasing the game, making it look far worse than it actually was. I mean, nobody... NOBODY has taken us apart in the same way that ManU were demolished by citeh or LeArse by ManU.

    I think the problem is that teams in the EPL are much harder to break down so this slow, overly methodical, build-up just isn't doing the job.

    I watched sperz tonight and the speed they move the ball is a LOT quicker than us when we're playing sometimes, at least in that game.
     
  25. Lamps>Gerrard

    Lamps>Gerrard Member

    Feb 15, 2009
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Thanks, great post. Keep it up.

    I guess I'll lay it out simply: we have the players to beat the mediocrity that is Liverpool, and Arsenal. We don't need to add 4-5, and get rid of whoever else to take these teams on.
     

Share This Page