The A-League Expansion Thread

Discussion in 'Australian A-League' started by Azzballz the Great, Mar 26, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Capt. Socceroo

    May 7, 2001
    Adelaide, Australia
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    It appears the axe is about to fall on everyone's fave second club:

    The impending A-League execution of North Queensland Fury, after just two seasons in the competition, is almost certain to be rubber-stamped by Football Federation Australia at its next board meeting in Sydney on 15 February.


    rest here:
    http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/news/1043047/Fury-set-to-fold-
     
  2. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Sad stuff.

    Haven't done any proper digging into the financial story but may be better for FFA to cut losses rather than keep bleeding. Huge gift to the rest of the league, player-wise.
     
  3. Quicky

    Quicky Member

    Jul 2, 2007
    Wherever I May Roam
    Club:
    Melbourne Victory
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Just stresses the importance that expansion has to be based on a financially sound platform. Slow and steady growth should be the goal.
     
  4. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Good, Nth QLD and football just doesnt work, it cuts out along trip for teams as well.
    Time to focus on where teams will work, I say forget west Sydney, and bring in teams here-
    first Wollongong Wolves.
    Then Canberra Cosmos.
    Then second NZ team based at Christchurch.
    Last third victorian team at Geelong.
     
  5. Capt. Socceroo

    May 7, 2001
    Adelaide, Australia
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Forget West Sydney?? IF football in australia had a heartland(top players produced, large 2nd gen popn open to the game, large junior base etc) then Western Sydney would be it. WS also introduces another 'big' derby game that the FFA can actually market every season to the neutrals/non-football folks in the way RL does for SOO. West Sydney ASAP Please!
    I like the idea of Canberra and Woolongong, but AFC had a conniption-fit about 1 NZ(OFC team in the HAL, MBH would just about have cardiac arrest if we tried for 2. I reckon wait for OFC to either die or be absorbed by AFC, then we could have up to 3 NZ teams(Auckland and CHCH to join Welly)
    what about Tasmania United's bid. If AFL want to turn their back on a whole state, why not move in there ourselves?
    Geelong, just no
    They'd get no local media sponsorship attention unless they tried the failed Collingwood/Carlton/Parra model and linked with the Cats ARFC. Those models failed for a reason, so just no. the other cities mentioned above would take Australia/NZ to 16 team league, a perfect size IMHO(As long as all teams were on a solid financial base.
     
  6. Capt. Socceroo

    May 7, 2001
    Adelaide, Australia
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    ^^this.
     
  7. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    West Sydney are a basketcase, look at what happened to the last bid, the people out there are brain dead bogans.
    Screw the AFC, its our comp not theirs, if we want to let in another NZ team we can, why not just put a rule in saying any NZ team may play in the ALeague , just not qualify for the Asian championships until the OFC is merged into the AFC, what the freaking hell is so hard about that?
    Tasmania United sounds good, I think there has to be a third team in Victoria somewhere, we cant have 4-5 teams in NSW and only 2 in Australias second most populated state, and seeing as they only have Geelong outside of Melbourne as any worthwhile sized city that will have to be it.

    So a good comp in ten years time would be

    Syd FC
    Jets
    Wolves
    Mariners
    Roar
    GC United
    Victory
    Heart
    Geelong
    Adelaide
    Perth
    Canberra
    Tasmania
    Auckland
    Phoenix
    Christchurch
     
  8. Bass0r

    Bass0r Member

    Jan 18, 2009
    Tokyo/N. Velidhoo
    Club:
    Urawa RD
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    So much ridiculous in one post; it's making my head spin.
     
  9. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Whats so ridiculous about having NZ teams play in the ALeague, but not qualify for the Asian club championship if they finish in a qualifying position?

    Please, try and think outside what they tell you for once, because they dont even think deep enough themselves.
     
  10. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Just one reason, and it's enough on its own: we don't want to piss off our confederation head twice as much as we already are.
     
  11. cmedina1983

    cmedina1983 New Member

    Nov 14, 2008
    California
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Sometimes... even though I'd hate to think it... it's BigFoody sending trolls back over to the Football side of things whenever I read his/her/its posts.

    Nobody can be that stupid and be serious at the same time.
     
  12. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Go back to sleep mate, thinking will hurt.
     
  13. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Whats so wrong with the solution I presented above, explain why its not feasible.
     
  14. Zednaught

    Zednaught Member

    Jan 11, 2011
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    Geelong will never work as it is very much a one team town.

    Tasmania also has very significant issues with a team.
    For a non Aussie rules/cricket sport to succeed in a national competition in Tasmania they would need a Hobart team and Launceston team.
     
  15. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    In the immediate future:

    North Qld - Fury are probably gone and replacement is a long way away.

    SE Qld - Tapped out with GCU and Roar

    North NSW - nah

    W Sydney - still a strategic imperative to FFA.

    Illawarra - If they can get WIN done up they're a definite possibility

    Canberra - Came close last time, should be a candidate again

    Melbourne - Tapped out

    Tasmania - North/South split + AFL mad + shrinking population = nope

    Adelaide - One team town

    Perth - ditto

    NT - Growing population could see them on the radar in a few years.

    Kiwiland - only comes into the picture if MBH leaves, possibly not even then.

    This expansion period has had four teams in the frame of which Heart looks safe, GCU still fragile, Fury goners and Rovers stillborn.

    There will be a lot more caution at FFA and their ownership priorites will probably switch to a broader, community-based model as the story of the last two years has been one of large investors failing to anticipate or wear the costs of running a club.

    In conclusion I think we'll see a 12 team league by 2013-14, the additions are likely to be Western Sydney and Canberra or Illawarra, but there will probably be very little movement after that.
     
  16. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Your wrong about Tasmania, its population is EXPAAANNNDING!
    Also WIN is getting fixed up soon
     
  17. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    No, it's growth rate is slowing, and the ABS projections have it dropping over the period 2018-21.
     
  18. Zednaught

    Zednaught Member

    Jan 11, 2011
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    The Tasmanian population is stagnant.

    It is also heavily an Aussie rules state.

    Also there is no major stadium in Hobart that will be suitable as Bellerive will be used for cricket during the A-League season.
     
  19. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    They just need to rewire the universe so that there's neat little 17,000 seater that exists simultaneously in Hobart and Launceston.
     
  20. Capt. Socceroo

    May 7, 2001
    Adelaide, Australia
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Tasmania IS an Aussie Rules State, but they are being ignored by the AFL. If a competent and well funded bid was put forward by Tasmania, football would be crazy to reject it solely on the basis of their sporting history being Aussie Rules based. I agree, the North/South issue would have to be addressed as part of their submission.
    In order, I think the FFA's priorities are and should be:
    Solidify the base of the remaining 10 clubs and the league in general. It has become all too easy for the soccer-knockers out there in the forth estate to stick the boot into the leasgue and by extension the sport as a whole! A Strong A-League needs to be a part of the fabric of the sport of football in Australia, we can't just rely on the Socceroos to be a rainmaker and friend-maker every four years(what happens if we don't qualify - happened to England and Holland in recent times, could certainly happen to us:()
    ANY expansion must be handled with due diligence this time!, if the green light is given, I think they'll look at in order:
    West Sydney
    Canberra
    Woolongong
    Rest - give it time to bed down
    Tasmania
    IF at any stage OFC dies or is absorbed by AFC, then Auckland an/or Christchurch could be considered. We don't want to go around p*ssing off MBH. He is one of the most powerful figures in football theses days( after all, Qatar got the World Cup!) and I reckon he's odds on to become Sepp(tic) Bladder's replacement as head of FIFA.
     
  21. AllWhitebeliever

    AllWhitebeliever Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 4, 2006
    On the injury table
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    New Zealand
    The make-up A-League is an FFA affair not an AFC issue. AFC executive committee has already ruled that the Wellington Phoenix can't do AFC Champions League, therefore it does not matter that a couple of NZ teams are added. There is no real compulsion to change any existing policies because of it.

    [It's not that Sepp Blatter has total control on the outcomes of some of the FIFA executive committee decisions either].

    So even if MBH becomes the FIFA president, he is not allow to be seen to interfere the AFC politics or it will draw some high and sharp criticism from other confederations for what is basically an internal AFC matter not an FIFA matter about the state of the NZ teams in the A-league. The next AFC president might be quite happy to allow A-league NZ teams to complete in the AFC Champions League as long as they follow a set or approved criteria from the AFC committee. MBH, as FIFA president, can't interfere with the process or it would be scandalous.

    The only thing that MBH can change, as FIFA president along with the executive committee, is to approve any NZ A-leagues Teams to complete in the O-league as NZ representatives if the NZF and OFC allows it by rights of an approved competition level.

    And it is quite possible that MBH could allow that to strengthen the OFC and prevent an AFC/OFC merger. This way, it would not be scandalous.

    The other thing that people may not realise, is that if NZ is somehow accepted in AFC, it does not spell the end of OFC nor will it means that AFC will merge with OFC. OFC would only just shift their small HQ to a place in the islands and conduct business from there. OFC nations would only just have a larger difference to make up in playing levels in their playoff path to the men's world cup but not in the other FIFA tournaments. It would be hard to downgrade a confederation full status back to pre-1996 simply because of one country changing over to another confederation especially with the support and developments it has improved in recent times. FIFA will have to naturally give them a period of time to adjust and develop before any assessment review is carried out. OFC is in an unique situation compared to the other confederations and so should be give more flexibility as the result.
     
  22. drinky1993

    drinky1993 New Member

    May 2, 2010
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    FFA have f***ed up expansion wise.

    Already we had NZK fold within the first few seasons only picking up a few results their way. NQF are looking to fold within days and GCU are looking shakey and only staying in the competition from a cashed up owner. Melbourne Heart havent had any major problems and the Phoenix have been going at their pace well helping kiwi football greatly.

    So if 3 of 4 expansion teams are surviving isn't that saying the A-league is growing to rapid or STUPIDly to support these teams coming in. Especially since one of these teams were dragged in as a replacement from an already foundation team folding.

    FFA need to slow down, build on what they already have and then expand when the demands are there. Don't fall under the pressure of other competitions abroad growing and expanding and just focus on their own league.

    Tasmania sadly will have to wait a while (To solve the North/South issue maybe allocate even amounts of games north and south??). And geelong wont get a team in my lifetime (and im not old at all!). Western Sydney will be first in line for the next expansion spot but hopefully FFA wont make the mistake and do it too soon. It wont be next season they come in and it wont be the next. Canberra and Wollongong i feel have been the most patient to gain a side in the competition, Wollongong in my opinion wont get one in front of Canberra and W/Sydney however. Also these teams will be snubbed by FFA until after the FFA attempt to include a W/Sydney team again.

    NT will not gain a side in the competition.... period. Their weather all year round in above 30 degrees and in the summer when the game is held is terrential rain. Plus the travel factor. Im certain teams from Melbourne, Wellington, NSW, even Adelaide are sick of all the travel they do already.

    My opinion for next season.. Shorten the length of the season so each team only plays each other twice (home and away) but play a few more games judged by geographic location (obviously a Melbourne Derby, SE Qld Derby, Sydney vs CCM vs New Jets etc)
     
  23. AllWhitebeliever

    AllWhitebeliever Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 4, 2006
    On the injury table
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    New Zealand
    To be honest, are we to totally blame the FFA?

    The attendance has dropped and maybe we have already saturated the hardcore fan market as it is. The half and half fans and the bandwagon fans are only really going to turn up and relate to winners and playoff finalist. The top half of the table usually gets most of the overall crowd.

    Are we on a crossroad at expansion? It takes time to expand the league and to grow crowd numbers and usually it comes with a long family tradition like in Europe and South America. We may only get the fruits of the competition after about 25 years when there is a new generation of supporters are born under the new A-league system.

    Until then all the FFA can do is to allow some minimum entry criteria for club tenders and spread the competition a round the country while in the process try and solve the distance cost/time issue as well as increasing crowds numbers along non-hardcore football fans. We have to acknowledge that there will be teething problems and that some clubs will fail along the way despite having the best club plan on paper.

    To illustrate a point using an example from the olden days, when the English first division started many years ago, quite a number of those clubs are no longer at the top current level (EPL or Championship) toady. Some have even disappeared. And it took them an very long time to go expand the team numbers from the original 12 [in 1888] teams. And to get their second division they had to merge with an rival football alliance which expand the top division to 16 in 1892 and then it until after WWI [1919], it was expanded to 22 teams. That was a process of over 30 years and merging of existing local leagues as well as being through a war and the fact that football is their number one sport (along with cricket) under amateur rules. England had the population and the popularity and the travel distances are not as big as what we have as well as having quite cheap tickets and having smaller stadiums.

    Today in Australia, we have longer distances that may be counteracted by air travel for time but has a large cost involved compared to the short distance of busing/train and for nearly tenth of the cost in England. Also a lower population and the competition from other established sports and we are nowhere capable to making an impact we dream of.

    The problems are inherent.

    1.) distance are longer
    2.) today cost are higher (air travel, stadium cost, advertising)
    3.) other established sporting competitions
    4.) other local events
    5.) less weekend time (job dependent)
    6.) less family time (broken families units, smaller families, family geographic spread etc)
    7.) local economic crisis (more unemployment and minimum wage earners)

    I am not sure that FFA is to be totally blamed. It's just a hard road to go. If we have our weekends back, have shorter travel time and have less cost involved. Then maybe we can grow up in a straight line graph.

    Afterall, it's only been 5 years of A-League competition. Having a club or two having boarderline problems is sort of expected at this stage. The fact that we have growth from 8 clubs to 11/10 clubs in the 5 years, isn't a total write off. In fact, it was probably unwise to include two Queensland teams (Gold Coast & Fury) at the same time in the first expansion of the league as both teams have suffered to get crowds and maybe one may end up being cut. I still think an expansion team from Sydney will do well in a couple of years time.
     
  24. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    This is what we need to do-

    First cut Fury, its too far away and the locals only like the rugbys.
    Then cut Gold coast, the locals there obviously dont care about going to watch football, they have one of the best stadiums, their team seems to always be top 4 and they still cant get crowds even near 10,000, time to go.
    Bring in teams from Wollongong and Canberra first, let it settle for two years, then bring in west Sydney team and one from Hobart.
    Then after two more years 1 more NZ team from Christchurch, then leave it at that.

    New teams come on from somewhere like in 30- 40 years, when population has grown alot more.
     
  25. artml

    artml Member

    Liverpool FC
    Ukraine
    Jul 11, 2009
    Los Angeles
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    --other--
    Division 2 is what Australia desperately needs. A place where the costs of running a club are lower than in top flight so the ones like Fury or two Tasmanian teams or a Geelong team may exist and grow up slowly from the very bottom. Oh, and since it is not a first tier, you may add some NZ teams with no risk of causing MBH butthurt.

    This is how football was developed in Japan; this is how it is de facto happening in America. Learn from the others' experience is what FFA needs.
     

Share This Page