NASL/D2 News 2010 Part 5

Discussion in 'NASL' started by atlanticTFCfan, Jan 29, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    But it certainly hasn't gotten worse the last couple of years. Crazy, more unsettled? Definitely.

    More killified? No.
     
  2. speedcake

    speedcake Member

    Dec 2, 1999
    Tampa
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    People are always going to overstate problems/situations I guess.

    Are those factors he lists holding D2 and D3 back from becoming the successful leagues that many of us believe they can and should be? Yes, for sure.

    Are they "killing" the leagues? Your basic, garden variety hyperbole.
     
  3. time4wine

    time4wine Member

    Mar 13, 2009
    St. Louis
    Club:
    St. Louis Lions
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  4. atlanticTFCfan

    atlanticTFCfan Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 14, 2007
    Sydney, Nova Scotia
    Club:
    Toronto FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
  5. time4wine

    time4wine Member

    Mar 13, 2009
    St. Louis
    Club:
    St. Louis Lions
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    and don't forget same goes with Rochester!
     
  6. athletics68

    athletics68 Member+

    Dec 12, 2006
    San Diego & San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    No Austin, no Rochester... who does that currently leave NASL with?
     
  7. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Not much.

    Montreal
    Carolina
    CP Baltimore
    Puerto Rico
    Edmonton
    Miami
    Tampa
    Minnesota

    My guess is that the bid was submitted without CPB and Minnesota though since I believe I heard they only submitted 6 teams.
     
  8. jcm28

    jcm28 Member

    Apr 12, 2009
    Puerto Rico
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Puerto Rico
    Crap, the rochester switch was like a balance of powers.
     
  9. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I dunno about that. Basically traded PR for Rochester.
     
  10. athletics68

    athletics68 Member+

    Dec 12, 2006
    San Diego & San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Ouch. So St. Louis finally succumbed to their financial woes? And Montreal already has one foot out the door, Miami retains their severe lack of fans... It kind of scary how quickly the tables turn back and forth between the USL group and NASL.

    And how committed is PR to NASL, particularly with the addition of 3 Caribbean teams to USL Pro since they joined the NASL camp?
     
  11. jcm28

    jcm28 Member

    Apr 12, 2009
    Puerto Rico
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Puerto Rico
    Preety commited, believe me.
     
  12. jasontoon

    jasontoon Member

    Jan 9, 2002
    Seattle, WA
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    No, St. Louis succumbed to Yoshou forgetting to put it on that list.

    I'm not saying they'll definitely be around in 2011, but in the absence of any news, they seem a better bet than CPB and maybe Minnesota.
     
  13. athletics68

    athletics68 Member+

    Dec 12, 2006
    San Diego & San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So basically what you're telling me is that several NASL teams are in flux for next year...
     
  14. Mikey mouse

    Mikey mouse Member

    Jul 27, 1999
    Charleston, SC
    Club:
    Charleston
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    the bid NASL sent to USSF only include six teams. Carolina, Tampa Bay, Miami, Montreal, Puerto Rico and Edmonton.

    They will need a lot of waivers or exemptions to the new standards to become sanctioned.

    there has been discussion about which teams the USL would except back in and if those teams would even want to rejoin with the USL
     
  15. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    We have a winner. I knew I was forgetting someone.
     
  16. drSoFlaFan

    drSoFlaFan DEFEND THE FORT!

    Feb 25, 2008
    Plantation, FL
    Club:
    Ft Lauderdale Strikers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I believe USL had already announced their intended "Caribbean Division" or whatever when PR decided to align with NASL.
     
  17. WhiteStar Warriors

    Mar 25, 2007
    St.Pete/Krakow
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So basically USL Pro is for teams that will never ever go to MLS.

    and NASL are teams that for their further goal is to get expanded into MLS.
     
  18. athletics68

    athletics68 Member+

    Dec 12, 2006
    San Diego & San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I wouldn't bet on that. Orlando has MLS aspirations and they're in USL Pro. Plus you assume that NASL will get sanctioned. With only 6 teams in their bid they're not in any way guaranteed to be sanctioned.
     
  19. Hunter.S.Soccer

    Apr 13, 2006
    Tampa
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Just about every team above the PDL level, and even some at the PDL level, have aspirations about becomming an MLS club. I consider some as serious contenders, others not. I wouldn't consider Orlando as a likely MLS city... not unless MLS hits the 30-team mark. Even then, I wouldn't count on it.
     
  20. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    I disagree completely. I don't see any relevance.

    After Montreal joins MLS, I don't see any D2/D3 organizations that have the wherewithal to make the jump. Well, maybe Traffic, but they could've skipped the whole D2 empire building thing at any point and just ponied up the MLS expansion fee years ago.

    MLS expansion will come as currently uninvolved deep pocket investors step forward.
     
  21. Mikey mouse

    Mikey mouse Member

    Jul 27, 1999
    Charleston, SC
    Club:
    Charleston
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Andy's right. dont get me wrong, I support MLS but the business plan of single entity isnt that appealing to some of the current owners. I know charleston's owners enjoy playing against MLS teams in the preseason and the USOC, but have no intention of pushing for MLS. beside the MLS business model, charleston is also a very small market ( I think it was 99 on the tv market size in the US) and the owner are realistic about what will work and wont work here. right now, it wont work. 10 years from now, who knows?
     
  22. athletics68

    athletics68 Member+

    Dec 12, 2006
    San Diego & San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah but most don't have the wherewithal or the financial backing to make it happen. Orlando seems to at least possibly have the backing and funding, though they are currently missing a prime ingredient (a SSS).
     
  23. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    I haven't looked at where the new D3 team is playing, but I assume the facility is less than 10 years old. Two months before the WUSA launched in 2001 the Orlando Tempest were relocated to be the Carolina Courage because the WUSA and Time-Warner (the team owner) were unable to secure a suitable playing site in Orlando.
     
  24. Hunter.S.Soccer

    Apr 13, 2006
    Tampa
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    True, but I think the days when you would qualify for having an MLS team by simply coming up with a SSS and an owner are gone. Salt Lake City may have been the last of those.

    The key is also having the right market area - preferably a large one with a big TV market. Orlando is not on the top of the MLS's "ideal North American markets" list for the next several expansion slots. In fact, they're not even at the top of the list in Florida.

    From a funding standpoint, Orlando might have enough funds to sustain a D2 or D3 team (time will tell), but that's a far cry from having enough capital to support an MLS club.
     
  25. PopsKrock

    PopsKrock New Member

    Jul 18, 2007
    Belleville
    Club:
    AC St. Louis
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I would say those days never existed. The most important part has always been a ridiculously rich guy willing to lose boatloads of cash.
     

Share This Page