Match 33|Mexico vs. Uruguay|22-06-10|Post-match [R]

Discussion in 'GROUP A: South Africa, Mexico, Uruguay France' started by os_mutante, Jun 22, 2010.

  1. Daninho777

    Daninho777 Member

    Sep 23, 2009
    Club:
    Juventus FC
    Pfft, no please dont insult him, by asking if he plays in that shitty league haha :p. He plays for Palermo in serie A. One of their best players and top scorers and one of the best young strikers in Serie A. A lot of interest in him by big clubs, and Man City ofcoarse with all their money.
     
  2. WorldCupRene

    WorldCupRene New Member

    Jul 10, 2006
    There was a reason for that... Aguirre said before the World Cup that he had three captains: Marquez, Torrado and Blanco. This is why each match a different person has had the captain armband. That is the reason why Blanco started. Knowing how Blanco can react when promises are not kept, I think Aguirre felt forced to start him to keep the group united.

    Now you can call me crazy if you like, but I have this feeling Aguirre asked the defenders with card problems not to get themselves in foul trouble, which would obviously make the group tentative when playing defense, given that most of the defensive line had already a yellow card. In other words, the whole intention was to make it past the group stage with the ability to use all the starters in the next match. The defense in particular has a very significant drop off from the starters to the subs, so I see this being a very possible scenario.

    Now personally, I would have preferred to avoid Argentina altogether, but hey, if you want to be the best, you have to win those games that matter regardless of the rival, plus if Mexico pulls the upset, it will be a good way to get rid of all those ghosts that have haunted the team in relation to Argentina.

    In all honesty, I pity the team that plays Uruguay next... they have probably the most balanced team in the World Cup. I wonder who will have the ability to score against such a good defense. Congratulations Uruguay.
     
  3. ...In my defense

    Feb 11, 2006
    Aguirre's tactical f*ck ups aside, the team lacked urgency, which is rather strange given the circumstances of the game.

    Nothing to add other than congratulate our Uruguayan brothers, they played a great game and were fully prepared for Mexico.

    The game had 0-0 written all over it until Suarez scored.

    Congrats to South Africa as well for going out on a high note and good luck to all the teams that still have a chance.
     
  4. Tread

    Tread New Member

    Jul 1, 2009
    a+

    :)
     
  5. ...In my defense

    Feb 11, 2006
    LOL I didn't even notice that but ya know what I mean.
     
  6. Of_Wires_And_Birds

    Mar 20, 2009
    Edinburg, Texas!
    Club:
    CDSC Cruz Azul
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Ordered by points acquired
    1998:Netherlands, Mexico, Belgium, South Korea
    2002:Mexico, Italy, Croatia, Ecuador
    2006:portugal, Mexico, Angola, Iran

    You can hardly say those are "easy" groups and in 2002 Mexico had a harder group.
     
  7. Dustyvinyl

    Dustyvinyl Member

    Jun 16, 2008
    Santa Ana,Ca
    Club:
    Bolivar La Paz
    Nat'l Team:
    Bolivia
    I think im confusing him with another Uruguayan player.i am sure Panathinakos or a AEK is on par with a Serie A team like Palermo. but I obviously don't know, and i was just wondering.He's a good player BTW
     
  8. Mariella

    Mariella Member

    Mar 4, 2005
    Southern California
    Club:
    CA Boca Juniors
    Nat'l Team:
    Argentina
    Congrats to Mexico and Uruguay!!

    Yayyy, I'm so nervous and excited! Mexico vs. Argentina games are always fun to watch :)
     
  9. soccerdaddy

    soccerdaddy New Member

    Jan 12, 2007
    You do not "leave" the CONCACAF you play where FIFA tells you to play.
     
  10. Caesar

    Caesar Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 3, 2004
    Oztraya
    Actually, the individual confederations have control over who they choose to admit to membership and who they don't.

    By the way, the R16 match threads are up in the Knockout Rounds forum.
     
  11. WorldCupRene

    WorldCupRene New Member

    Jul 10, 2006
    True... otherwise New Zealand would still be playing in the same Confederation as Australia.
     
  12. El Gringo Ronaldo

    El Gringo Ronaldo New Member

    Jun 3, 2010
    Irvine/Utrecht
    Club:
    Everton FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Uruguay 1, Mexico 0

    That's all i have to say
     
  13. El Gringo Ronaldo

    El Gringo Ronaldo New Member

    Jun 3, 2010
    Irvine/Utrecht
    Club:
    Everton FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    P.S. for those that are badmouthing Aguirre, he was the one that got Mexico into the world cup. Mexico wasn't doing too good with Senor Eriksson behind the wheel.
     
  14. ...In my defense

    Feb 11, 2006
    P.S. those badmouthing Aguirre are Mexico fans and they're well within their right to say whatever they want.
     
  15. GrandeSoccer

    GrandeSoccer Member+

    Jun 20, 2010
    Club:
    Club América
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Ugh, so we're facing Argentina next? Like lambs to the slaughter. Ridiculous, let's hope they have at least a HINT of mercy on us.
     
  16. WorldCupRene

    WorldCupRene New Member

    Jul 10, 2006
    I don't know... this could go in so many different directions... it could be a close victory for Argentina, if Mexico does a good job defending and our strikers (as usual) fail to capitalize on the opportunities they have.

    It could go against Argentina, if Mexico scores early and does a good job defending. Or it could be rout.

    Remember, this is the same team that had trouble in the qualifiers... I still do not trust their defense to be all that good... so far all the teams they played were mediocre to bad.
     
  17. CheveLoco

    CheveLoco Member

    Apr 19, 2005
    San Diego, CA
    P.S: Aguirre has gone from "what works on the field" to "what i want on the field"
     
  18. drunkguy10

    drunkguy10 El Sancho

    Dec 26, 2006
    No idea
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Dude, Uruguay won, and they deserved it, but Mexico would have deserved it too.

    I don't mean to talk bad about Uruguay, but they played dirty. They fouled Mexico numerous times inside Uruguay's penalty area, they held the players' shirts, pushed them and everything without the ref seeing it, or he just ignored it. I cannot say Mexico lost due to the ref, but I'll say it contributed.

    Nevertheless, good game, and good luck vs South Korea.
     
  19. drunkguy10

    drunkguy10 El Sancho

    Dec 26, 2006
    No idea
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    :rolleyes:

    Mexico was initially invited by the South Americans to play Copa America when it started, had Mexico accepted, they would have been part of conmebol now:(
     
  20. Quenonino!

    Quenonino! New Member

    Dec 10, 2009
    Club:
    CA Peñarol
    Nat'l Team:
    Uruguay
    Uruguay played dirty, are you kidding me????? Try to take off your jersey once and a while and make an objective comment. By the way just be glad Uruguay was satisfied with the 1-0 win and didn't drop a couply of more goals on you or else it would be back to Mexico...............aye aye aye aye CANTA NO LLORES!!!!!!!
     
  21. drunkguy10

    drunkguy10 El Sancho

    Dec 26, 2006
    No idea
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    yeah, because Uruguay was controlling the game and could have scored more if it wanted to.:rolleyes:

    Like I said, I don't mean to insult or diminish Uruguay, but they scored a good, somewhat lucky goal, but for the most part, they were defending, that was their game. They are good at it, but don't act as if Uruguay is this goal scoring machine. I wish they would have tried to go for the second, so they would have open up spaces in their defense, but it didn't happen.
     
  22. FBNR

    FBNR Member

    Jan 28, 2010
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    imo game could have gone either way.
    whats really killing mexico is their inability to finish their scoring chances.
     
  23. celeste4life

    celeste4life Member

    Dec 16, 2007
    United States
    Club:
    CA Peñarol
    Nat'l Team:
    Uruguay
    Uruguay kept attacking after the goal, and for the first 15 of the 2nd half, Uruguay was the only one attacking
     
  24. ...In my defense

    Feb 11, 2006
    Come on dude, don't go down the sore loser route.

    Uruguay is a defensively stout team by nature but they know how to manage games and the results back it up. Just because they don't push their lines up with every offensive possession like Mexico, doesn't mean they're bunkering and countering.

    This is how I saw the game as well although Uruguay's attacks had a bit more clarity. They certainly threatened our backline through out the game.

    Most international media sources say the same thing.

    Mexico plays attractive, flowing football but they can't finish.

    Story of our lives.
     
  25. maestri09

    maestri09 Member+

    Jun 14, 2006
    Toronto, Canada
    Club:
    Alianza Lima
    Nat'l Team:
    Peru
    I think this is just another example (more evidence) that all those wins that Mexico racks up in the Copa America don't matter. When a south american team brings out all their players and really want to play, they are a notch above Mexico.

    Of course, it's a close gap. But they've yet to convince that they are big enough to win a truly important game against CONMEBOL or UEFA.
     

Share This Page