Most Likely 23 for WC

Discussion in 'England' started by essie, Jul 10, 2009.

  1. lanman

    lanman BigSoccer Supporter

    Aug 30, 2002
    The squad for the next games is:

    Foster (Manchester United), Green (West Ham), Robinson (Blackburn), Johnson (Liverpool), Brown (Manchester United), Upson (West Ham), Terry (Chelsea, capt), Lescott (Manchester City), A Cole (Chelsea), Bridge (Chelsea), Wright-Phillips (Manchester City), Lennon (Tottenham), Beckham (Los Angeles Galaxy), Barry (Manchester City), Lampard (Chelsea), Carrick (Manchester United), Gerrard (Liverpool), A Young (Aston Villa), Milner (Aston Villa), Rooney (Manchester United), Heskey (Aston Villa), Defoe (Tottenham), C Cole (West Ham), Crouch (Tottenham).

    Assuming everyone is fit then I see it as follows for South Africa:

    Keepers - There's still a good chance that either Hart or James will be involved - I don't think anything's set in stone with the keepers other than that Green will be one of the three.

    Defenders - Ferdinand will go, and Jagielka has a chance if he comes back in the same form as before his injury. Bridge could miss out with Lescott able to play left back.

    Midfield - Hargreaves is the $64,000 question. If he's fit (and that's a big if) he is likely to travel (he could also provide cover at right back and free up another spot). Other than that, Downing will probably be back in the reckoning as I don't see Capello taking three right wingers (four if you include Beckham) in Wright-Phillips, Lennon and Walcott (who will be picked as he provides a striking option) and not a single left footed option. Milner and Young both offer versatility, but it may come down to a straight choice between the two.

    Forwards - Walcott for Crouch as fifth striker.
     
  2. Stretch Armstrong

    Jan 15, 2004
    England are pretty much screwed without Rio.

    If any combination of Terry/Upson/Jagielka play, commendable performers as they are, England's hopes are severly lessened.
     
  3. lanman

    lanman BigSoccer Supporter

    Aug 30, 2002
    If any team loses one of their best players their chances are lessened, although we did win in Germany with Terry and Upson at the back.
     
  4. Stretch Armstrong

    Jan 15, 2004
    Of course, arguably England's best player. Its just the lack of pace in those I mentioned that worry me. England defend too deep as it is.

    That German team was very poor.
     
  5. lanman

    lanman BigSoccer Supporter

    Aug 30, 2002
    Italy lost Nesta (their best defender) before the knock out games and ended up playing Materazzi and Cannavaro - hardly the quickest of pairings. Obviously they stood no chance.
     
  6. revelationx

    revelationx Member+

    Jun 5, 2006
    London
    Easy draw! :rolleyes:
     
  7. lanman

    lanman BigSoccer Supporter

    Aug 30, 2002
    Yeah. Facing Shevchenko, Klose and Henry is easy.
     
  8. Stretch Armstrong

    Jan 15, 2004
    Yes but Italy are actually rather good at maintaining possession when they feel the need and had players like Gattuso /Rossi/Perrotta bouncing effervesently in specific and controlled areas and Pirlo dictating.

    I'm still surprised Italy managed it with Materrazzi and he certainly grabbed the headlines in the final.

    England need pace to be effective in my opinion.
     
  9. Stretch Armstrong

    Jan 15, 2004
    Henry should have done more, for sure.

    Klose is one paced, not particularily useful outside the box and relies on good service - Italy, whoever their personnel, always seems adept at strangling the supply lines.

    Shevchenko I was a big fan of but he had next to no support in that Ukraine side.
     
  10. revelationx

    revelationx Member+

    Jun 5, 2006
    London
    The best opposition striker in their group was Koller - who did not face them due to injury. Italy then had Australia! Then in the QFs, Italy faced Ukraine - the weakest of the last 8 teams. Germany and France were tough but that was in the semis and Final. Italy clearly got an easy draw before the semis. Obviously eventually they had to face some quality sides as they progressed. Just compare Italy's path to the Final and France's path.

    Anyway going back to England. I don't think England are in trouble if Rio is out. At CB England are relatively deep. After Rio we have Terry, Upson, Lescott, Jagielka, Turner, Brown, Wheater etc. OK some of these are raw/untried at this level but it is unlikely we have more than 3 CBs out at the same time. I am more concerned about goalkeeper depth and quality for England.
     
  11. The Potter

    The Potter Member+

    Aug 26, 2004
    England
    Club:
    Stoke City FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    I'll go with-

    Green; James; Foster

    G. Johnson; Ferdinand; Terry; A.Cole; Brown; Upson; Lescott

    Lennon; Lampard; Barry; Gerrard; Beckham; Hargreaves; Carrick; J.Cole

    Rooney; Heskey; Defoe; C.Cole; Walcott
     
  12. thebigman

    thebigman Member+

    May 25, 2006
    Birmingham
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    personally i think we need 2 players for each position and 3 gks

    so,

    green/james/robbo - possibly hart instead of robbo if form is good

    johnson/brown
    cole/bridge

    terry/upson
    rio/lescott

    barry/carrick
    lampard/hargreaves - if owens fit, otherwise the likes of huddlestone or noble possibly if they are in form

    gerrard/cole - or young

    lennon/theo

    rooney/defoe

    heskey/cole

    this is all atm stuff though
     
  13. Mourinho's Mentor

    Mourinho's Mentor New Member

    Sep 9, 2009
    Club:
    PSV Eindhoven
    It will be nice if Beckham was selected as it would be his fourth world cup wouldn't it?
     
  14. thebigman

    thebigman Member+

    May 25, 2006
    Birmingham
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    capello doesn't do nice ;)
     
  15. sinner78

    sinner78 BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 7, 2001
    Green
    Foster
    Hart

    Cole
    Gibbs
    Brown
    Johnson
    Ferdinand
    Terry
    Upson

    lampard
    Gerrard
    Young
    Lennon
    Carrick
    barry
    Joe Cole
    Milner


    Rooney
    C.Cole
    Defoe
    Heskey
    walcott
     
  16. sinner78

    sinner78 BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 7, 2001
    We dont need to waste squad spots on the likes of james ,downing and crouch..
     
  17. three lions

    three lions Member

    Apr 2, 2005
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    so very true...
     
  18. sinner78

    sinner78 BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 7, 2001
    We dont need 3 tall strikers ...
    i say we need two target men (heskey ,cole)
    two pacey forwards (defoe ,walcott)
    and the roonster..

    We sure as hell dont need downing when we have young ,gerrard ,milner and joe cole
     
  19. sinner78

    sinner78 BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 7, 2001
    This is one time when we have multiple options in most positions.
    In 2002 and 2006 we picked injured players in our squad because we didnt have the depth.
     
  20. revelationx

    revelationx Member+

    Jun 5, 2006
    London
    The World Cup Squad for SA has not yet been picked - we may yet again end up picking players who are slightly injured.
     
  21. three lions

    three lions Member

    Apr 2, 2005
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    Yeah, I think the days of Downing making the squad are growing less and less. With the players we have now, and the younger ones coming up, it makes it that much more unlikely for him.... Injuries would be the only way he gets brought into the squad now..
     
  22. RobTheFool

    RobTheFool Member+

    Apr 19, 2008
    London, England
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    My ideal squad would be something like this:

    Green
    Hart
    James

    Johnson
    Brown
    Rio
    Terry
    Upson
    Lescott
    A.Cole
    Bridge

    Lennon
    Walcott
    Milner
    Gerrard
    Lampard
    Barry
    Hargreaves (definately if fit and playing well)
    Joe Cole

    Defoe
    Rooney
    C.Cole
    Heskey


    I actually had real trouble with midfield.. I think that is our position where we have the most depth when all players are fit. If Hargreaves is fit and playing well, I think he has to go, and that probably means Carrick having to stay home, which would be a shame.. Joe Cole is also a player that if playing well would surely come.. Milner has earned a squad place in my eyes, as has Defoe and Carlton Cole... another thing we could do, but I'm not sure if Capello will do, is leave Lescott out and bring in Carrick, as Brown can play CB, and Hargreaves can play RB.. I'm not sold on Lescott at the moment.


    Sadly, there is no place for Beckham it seems, it is a shame, but for the good of the team I think he will understand. He is the one player in our squad with the most passion maybe bar JT.
     
  23. KyleP

    KyleP Member

    Jan 24, 2009
    Club:
    AC Milan
    Green
    James
    Foster

    Johnson
    Brown
    Ferdinand
    Terry
    Upson
    Lescott
    A. Cole
    Bridge

    Lennon
    Gerrard
    Lampard
    Barry
    Milner
    Beckham
    J. Cole

    Walcott
    Rooney
    Heskey
    Defoe
    C. Cole

    I don't think Hargreaves will be fit, otherwise he'd be in there instead of Beckham. Beckham seems to have the support of Capello now anyway and has probably jumped above Carrick in the English midfield pecking order. The defence and forwards practically choose themselves, although Crouch could still oust Carlton Cole for that last spot. The goalkeeping position is still an area of debate, although Green is definitely on the plane to South Africa. Any two of James, Foster, Hart, Robinson and Carson could still make the squad.
     
  24. RobTheFool

    RobTheFool Member+

    Apr 19, 2008
    London, England
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    James is almost a dead on cert to go. Love him or hate him - he has experience. If Green gets an injury, the last thing we need is a new keeper that has no experience. The other keeper will be one of Foster, Robinson or Hart.
     
  25. M

    M Member+

    Feb 18, 2000
    Via Ventisette
    The same argument could be made for Robinson though. The way I look at it, the three will be Green, one of James/Robinson and - maybe - Foster.
     

Share This Page