Atlanta and Birmingham

Discussion in 'USL Expansion' started by WhiteStar Warriors, Aug 27, 2009.

  1. WhiteStar Warriors

    Mar 25, 2007
    St.Pete/Krakow
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    NuRock Soccer Holdings, based in Atlanta, is led by Rob Hoskins and Alec Papadakis. NuRock Soccer Holdings is currently a USL franchisee with a Premier Development League operation in Atlanta and rights to acquire two USL First Division teams in Atlanta, Georgia and Birmingham, Alabama marketplaces, respectively.
     
  2. nick p

    nick p Member+

    Jul 11, 2009
    Baltimore Maryland
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    worth noting that Atlanta's old USL First Division team, the Silverbacks, hasn't been officially folded yet and has until the registration period for next year to decided whether or not they will compete anymore.
     
  3. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The press release says that NuRock has the rights to Atlanta. I think that's a pretty clear statement that the Silverbacks no longer have any opening in the market.

    Not that anyone expected they'd be back.
     
  4. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    From experience, you usually have till August 1 to renew your D1 team - if not, you lose the franchise rights.
     
  5. adoptedsooner

    adoptedsooner Member

    Dec 5, 2007
    Norman
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So does this mean we see new USL-1 teams in Atlanta and Birmingham? And if so, where do they play?
     
  6. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think they just acquired the rights to those cities. I don't think a time frame has been announced, but I hope its for next season.
     
  7. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I hope not.

    But I wouldn't be entirely shocked. USL1 teams have appeared faster than that.

    I'd much prefer they hold off a year, get themselves organized and settled into being USL1 owners and see what they can do about improving the entire league before they go creating two new teams out of thin air.

    There's already Tampa and NY coming in next year. With Portland and Vancouver leaving in 2011, it would be nice timing for Atlanta and Birmingham to come in then. It would keep the # of teams steady and the demand for players the same. But, most importantly, give them plenty of time to do the groundwork for the new teams.

    But, as I said, I wouldn't be shocked to see them come in. All it will take is Miami leaving (and I'd say it's about 90% likely at this point) and at least one of those two will get nudged in earlier than they should be.
     
  8. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Rumors of Cary, Minnesota and Miami leaving - so that opens the door for B'ham, Atlanta and St Louis (from what I've heard).

    It would be nice for them to have a front office in place for a year before they take the field, but that rarely happens.
     
  9. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Are those real rumors of Cary, Minnesota and Miami leaving? Or just your assumptions based on the reporting from Inside Minnesota/MLS Talk that those three were involved in the Traffic group?

    I suppose it's possible that the Cary stadium will do perfectly fine without a pro team there, but the Railhawks have put together a very good organization and I have a hard time believing they'll walk away from USL1. And there's really no other place to go.

    Miami, I can believe. Traffic has been completely unable to make the Blues work, so I don't think any of us need any rumors to come up with the idea that Miami is most likely gone next year, especially with how this season started.

    But the Minnesota owners are fairly new, and Cary is a good organization in a good facility. I'll need a lot more reports before I can believe that they might walk.

    Now, having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if there's some really heated words coming from the Railhawks and Thunder ownership right now.
     
  10. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Miami - we know they nearly walked last year and they were trying to put a group together to buy the league. Minnesota's owners were part of this group from what I heard.

    Cary - One of their owners is not keen on the new league owners. Wouldn't rent out the silverback stadium to them and apparently there is long term bad blood.
     
  11. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    One of the Cary owners is the former Silverbacks owner?

    ...ah, I see. Jerkunica is a part owner. One of four owners. There are three others. Just because one of them has a long term problem with the new owners doesn't necessarily mean the other three do.
     
  12. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yep. That's why he moved Kalanji there last season.
     
  13. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm also not sure the other Railhawks owners should necessarily give much weight to the guy that mismanaged the Silverbacks into oblivion.
     
  14. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    He gives money, they give weight. Hopefully they stick around, would be nice to have B'ham, Atlanta, Charleston and Cary in the league.

    Then find a new owner for Nashville, get Charlotte to go to D1 and you would have a great division.
     
  15. ButlerBob

    ButlerBob Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 13, 2001
    Evanston, IL
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Actually considering the history of that franchise, he did a pretty good job. For the most part he stayed within his means and didn't over spend. Granted there were alot of complaints about the state of his stadium. But he did put a fairly good prodcut field.
     
  16. HSEUPASSION

    HSEUPASSION New Member

    Apr 16, 2005
    Duck, NC
    Charlotte don't have the finances to go USL-1.
     
  17. DavidP

    DavidP Member

    Mar 21, 1999
    Powder Springs, GA
    If blowing up the team every other year, alienating a good chunk of the fanbase (who went with the Atlanta Beat, and didn't come back after the Beat folded), going though coaches like most people change clothes, and loaning his best player to Red Bull in the midst of a playoff run, not to mention building a stadium without restrooms or concessions stands is doing a pretty good job, then yeah. :D
     
  18. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    they might in my new SE vision division ;)

    Longest road trip would be 8 hours I would think, that's not too bad and certainly better than driving to Ludlow, MA or New Hampshire as they have done in the past.

    Charlotte, Cary, Atlanta, Nashville, Birmingham, Charleston...that's good division. play each team home and away and that's 10 games right there.
     
  19. adoptedsooner

    adoptedsooner Member

    Dec 5, 2007
    Norman
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I've heard that Charlotte doesn't have the finances to move up, but I think USL-1 will eventually need to have a team in either Nashville or Memphis as a connector to Austin and everybody in the west.

    Although I've heard that a lot of kids play soccer in Birmingham so it could work out there.
     
  20. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I could imagine Charlotte not having the funds, but would be great if they could move up. Of course this is just another option in my dream scenario, but Carolina Dynamo were once in the top division.

    Austin is out there, but isn't San Antonio supposed to be getting a team?
    Then they need OKC or Tulsa.

    Ah... dreams are all we have.
     
  21. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The Spurs have said that they want to do a USL1 team. They've also said they won't do it without a stadium. There is a youth organization northeast of San Antonio, in Cibolo, that's in the process of building a stadium that might be a good place for a USL1 team eventually. That's where things stand right now.

    Charlotte tried it once (promotion) and, like Richmond, realized that it couldn't afford it and self-relegated. I've been thinking about this sort of thing in my Richmond thread. I didn't consider Charlotte because, looking at the attendance figures I have, they aren't doing that well and haven't been improving like Richmond. Their numbers are far short of what's needed to support a USL1 budget. Richmond is getting close, I think, but not Charlotte.
     
  22. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I remember when Richmond bought that custom bus, spent $350k on it.

    Charlotte - its just a dream, it would take some crazy lottery winner or Joe Gibbs to make that happen.

    Richmond is too far north for my "dream division".

    if B'ham does come alive, I hope they bring back the Grasshoppers name. Always liked that one.
     
  23. Alabama Soccer

    May 28, 2008
    Montgomery, AL
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! One of the major problems with the USL in my opinion is that it seems too mickey mouse. They want to compete with the big boys then they need to act like it. This league needs a major overhaul.
     
  24. panicfc

    panicfc Member+

    Dec 22, 2000
    In my chair, typing
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  25. Bluesfan

    Bluesfan Member+

    DC United
    Aug 12, 2000
    Tampa
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    Scotland
    It is actually a Eurosnob reference, not Mickey Mouse.

    Grasshoppers Zurich from Switzerland is where they copied the name from.
     

Share This Page