Dallas doesn't play in Frisco. They played in Irving and are going to be in Arlington this season. Huh? LA? There's a what? They have teams now? Can anyone read this? Also, there's a new post up on the Maryland Moment section of the Post website.
Something a tiny bit interesting from the Maryland Moment: I hadn't for a second thought of a new timeline. Anyone else? Also, I've never seen these two at the same time Which one is this a picture of? Most interesting part of that post...
Hmmm. Like I said earlier, I don't think the bill being amended is a bad thing so long as it still passes. Getting that land from Metro is going to take some time and in the meantime DCU can work behind the scenes to grease the wheels. Lets just hope they're better the second time around.
Wow, ground wouldn't be broken for 3 years It's amazing how long a project takes to get physically started even when it's approved... Whatever happened to the good ole' days of bribing and building within a year
If you're stressed out, and would like the rose-colored powder-puff view of things, check it out... you may even want to save it until bedtime. http://web.mlsnet.com/news/mls_news.jsp?ymd=20090318&content_id=227074&vkey=news_mls&fext=.jsp <homer drool> aarrarharhrrhra... kool aid...
Media whore? Not me. I'm just a loyal fan who just happens to have at the ready stack of carefully measured talking points aimed at addressing the key concern of the day, in this case -- money for PGC. I am not a media whore. I'm a media slut. Whores get paid.
This is from way back in the last thread, but yeah, Dustin, you're right, the type of people treating Morgan Blvd like it's Bowie are the same type as those treating Frisco like it's Oklahoma.
Yeah, but Frisco is to Dallas as Bowie is to DC. Actually, Bowie is a lot closer to downtown DC than Frisco is to downtown Dallas. Annapolis is actually more in line with the distance between Frisco and Dallas.
I hope all the newbies in the stadium threads also stick around to join us in the threads that discuss the actual team.
I was born in Plano in 1976, and the stuff they say about Frisco now, they said about Plano then. It's a different story today. Also, Frisco is north of Dallas, and most Dallasites with any money live on the north side of town. Whereas Bowie is East of DC, but most in the District with money live on the west side of town. Frisco is slightly closer to LBJ than Bowie is to DuPont/Adams Morgan, for instance, and it's not streetlights the whole way or the Beltway all the way around the city.
i work on brightseat road and i would prefer the morgan blvd site as well. although it really just depends where on brightseat they are looking. the half east of 202 is easily accessable by the largo station, but the west side is not. something right next to central ave and the morgan blvd station would be perfect for train commuters.
It's far away, regardless. Even if it's not in that city's 'favored quarter.' I know Dallas got a stadium where they could get one, but that doesn't mean it's a smart decision in the long run. Toronto, New York - stadiums accessible by transit with strong urban connections - that's what DC needs. If they get the Morgan Blvd land, that's OK. You'll get some groaning, you'll probably lose some fans, too. If they take Brightseat Road, a good mile from a Metro station, I think they'll take a big attendance hit, all else being equal.
This http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/18/AR2009031802283.html?nav=hcmodule is good news for a state or locality looking to issue new bonds, I would think. Sort of suggests that amending to take out the authority to issue the bonds quickly would be a bad move.
Washignton City Paper chimes in on the stadium issue with this week's edition. Dave McKenna wrote the article, available here. He also has an accompanying blog post that introduces it, available here. I think he hits on a huge issue with a lot of fans - moving to Maryland (particularly some parts of Maryland - more on that later) would be a mistake. From the blog: The part about suburban stadiums is spot on. And I don't mean suburban in terms of jurisdiction, I mean suburban in terms of design. That's why I'm particularly troubled by the factoid from the article that lends some more data to the two locations under consideration. We know Morgan Boulevard is the top choice - on land owned by WMATA, directly on top of a Metro station. This could mitigate the move to a part of PG that's particularly suburban - no real urban context, a lot of single use zoning, residential subdivisions sprinkled with cul-de-sacs, and autodependent sprawl. Still, with the Metro and the available land, there's room to shape things. However, the other location was simply designated as 'Brightseat Road,' without identifying a cross street. This article does: Brightseat Rd and Landover Rd? That would be horrendous. To get to that intersection, it's a 2 mile walk from the Largo Metro, the Landover Metro, and the Morgan Blvd Metro. I can say right now, that particular location will impact my attendance in a negative fashion. If this is the thinking, they've got some serious reassessment to do. Living in DC is not just a political choice, nor does the "urbane atmosphere" only cover some superficial details. I like living in DC, enjoying city life. So much so, in fact, that I got rid of my car, as it was superfluous. I know that I'm not alone amongst United fans in terms of lifestyle. They're walking a very fine line here, I just hope they realize it.
Well seeing that there isn't much of a choice...it's either build a stadium in Maryland or no more DC United. I'll take the 1st option even if it's not the best option. Why are we still arguing that the team should build in DC? They tried for 10+ years to get something done, the City has said to them we don't want your team or stadium, so no we move to plan B...if plan B doesn't work I'd really hate to see plan C.
That's a good piece. However, while I agree in theory with the urban/suburban argument, I don't think there's any legitimate reason for the club to be concerned about an impact on its off field success. I understand your relationship to urban life, and the urban sense of the club and supporter groups, but as has been pointed out, it's a very small, albeit critical, part of the entire operation. I can tell you with 100% certainty that of the 100-200 or more that I know that live in the Baltimore metro area who coach, play, and consume soccer, none of them will care for one second whether the team plays inside the District or outside of it. All they will care about is how long it takes to get there, how much does it cost, and is it fun to do. To the extent that the makeup of the fans could change, I think it will be up to the core fans to keep the atmosphere the same. And finally, as for my experience of going to games, there's basically nothing urban about it. I drive on a highway through suburbs and I end up parking my car either at a metro station in the suburb or at the stadium, and when I'm at the stadium, all I can pretty much see is houses and parking lots (unless I happen to be on the upper bowl, and then I can see the Capitol dome). After the game is over, reverse the process. There isn't jack around RFK to do, to spend money, or anything else. Basically, other than a tailgate, I am in and out. (EDIT: This is an exxageration. 3/4 of the time because I am so far away I work a day full of events into my gamedays, either on the Mall, or other spots in the DC Metro area, but it requires quite a bit of planning because RFK is not near anything else.) The whole point of a new stadium is to give us other options around the thing. At that point, if I'm walking, riding, or even driving to something else close by, that will be a lot more "urban" to me. As I said, if I could, I happily plop a stadium down in SE right now. But since that ain't happening, and it's not like the team is going to self-combust in Landover, let's just move forward.
Yeah, I had a feeling (wasn't it reported by Goff?) that the old Landover Mall site would be an option. And yeah, that's not good. Let's see how it plays out though. United would have to use shuttles from New Carrollton and Largo/Morgan stations if they go with that site.