"Quakes chasing a Canary?" (Tuesday, 5/13/08)

Discussion in 'San Jose Earthquakes' started by Goodsport, May 13, 2008.

  1. Goodsport

    Goodsport Moderator
    Staff Member

    May 18, 1999
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  2. Sacramento_Soccer

    Sacramento_Soccer New Member

    Apr 15, 2008
    Sacramento
    Sign me up for this deal...It would be huge for us to have Huckerby, If he can produce like he used too with Man City and Coventry.
     
  3. morgan1906ultras

    morgan1906ultras New Member

    Apr 9, 2008
    Please he's done!!!
    better have a youger player who can run 90 min.
     
  4. nivla

    nivla Member+

    Jan 17, 2003
    Milpitas
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    He is a forward/winger according to that link. Is that where we really need help the most? I would think an A-Mid is our biggest need.
     
  5. Beerking

    Beerking Member+

    Nov 14, 2000
    Humboldt County
    I'll take Huckerby over Glinton, Kamara or Pguerra in a heartbeat! Our idiot forwards have only scored one goal in 7 games.
     
  6. sko16

    sko16 New Member

    May 2, 2007
    Israel
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Israel
    I think we should be a little more patient, just a couple of weeks. There will be SO many more good strikers available as soon as more are released. The seasons are just ending so there will be many out there. Huckerby is not the pick of the litter. I think it's more likely than not that he's past his due date.
     
  7. Qrom

    Qrom Member

    Oct 26, 2007
    east bay
    If Toronto pick this guy up they will be really formidable in this league. Its really amazing what kinda of turn around they pulled so far this year. At the begining of the year they were probably worse than us and now they are one of the best in the league.
     
  8. bsman

    bsman Member+

    May 30, 2001
    MadCity
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Umm, what :confused:



    2008 Major League Soccer Standings

    Eastern Conference PTS
    Columbus Crew 18
    Chicago Fire 16
    New England Revolution 13
    Red Bull New York 11
    Toronto FC 10
    Kansas City Wizards 10
    D.C. United 6
     
  9. sko16

    sko16 New Member

    May 2, 2007
    Israel
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Israel
    Eh, I kinda still agree. Not best in the league in the standings, but possibly now one of the best teams. Only the end of the season will show. And I know Toronto is not a team I would want to play against right now, especially with their shit field and crazy fans.
     
  10. Qrom

    Qrom Member

    Oct 26, 2007
    east bay
    So what did I say that was wrong? At the begining of the year they were terrible, now they are 5th place in the league! Toronto on 10 points is better than every team in our division and things are looking up for them. They have made some great early season pickups and apparently are still looking for more. Also they didn't play last week so teams like NY and NE passed them.
     
  11. guamster

    guamster Member+

    Mar 30, 2001
    Winnetka, CA
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    Guam
    TFC has also not lost in 4 games (3 wins, 1 draw). So yes, of recent, they have been tough to beat, especially at home.
     
  12. bsman

    bsman Member+

    May 30, 2001
    MadCity
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes

    My bad! :eek:
     
  13. guamster

    guamster Member+

    Mar 30, 2001
    Winnetka, CA
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    Guam
    More good info from Jeff Carlisle at centerlinesoccer.com:

    Quakes second in line for Huckerby

     
  14. nivla

    nivla Member+

    Jan 17, 2003
    Milpitas
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    I wonder who are the other 10 discoveries we filed. And how does that discovery work in MLS?
     
  15. sjquakesfan81

    sjquakesfan81 New Member

    Oct 1, 2005
    Boston, MA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    We've been discussing the possibility of acquiring Huckerby for about a week and a half now in the Dear Lord, Can We Get a Forward... thread. I posted a link there with a pretty cool Frank Yallop interview from the Ipswich Town blog. Yallop admits that the Quakes would love to acquire Huckerby, and that he may be in town to visit SJ this week after he's done visiting Toronto. Yallop also mentions that the Quakes have been in contact with Huckerby's agent.

    I also posted a couple of links to some sweet Huckerby YouTube videos, including one of a goal that I think may rival (or surpass) Georgie Best's famous Quakes goal.
     
  16. futbol monkey

    futbol monkey Member

    Dec 12, 2007
    Santa Clara
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Basically it's like calling dibs on a player. Whichever team files the discovery first, gets first dibs on the player.

    As I see it, a few things have to happen before Huckerby comes to San Jose:

    1. Huckerby wants to come to MLS.
    2. Huckerby wants to come to San Jose.
    3. San Jose is willing to pay what Huckerby is asking for.
    4. We make a trade to TFC for Huckerby's rights.

    If any of those 4 items don't happen, no Huckerby for San Jose and we move on to one of the other 10 discoveries we have filed with the league.
     
  17. JazzyJ

    JazzyJ BigSoccer Supporter

    Jun 25, 2003
    Would Huckerby be the proverbial "canary in the coal mine" in Quakeland? If he can't score, then we know we've got big problems. :)
     
  18. krudmonk

    krudmonk Member+

    Mar 7, 2007
    S.J. Sonora
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Are you suggesting that everyone may need to bail at some point?
     
  19. Nadir

    Nadir New Member

    Mar 29, 2005
    Campbell, CA
    I am not so excited about this. I say let's not rush to fix anything. This is our first season back and we should not expect any quick fixes and start doing a Mo Johnston. Frankly I'd even be OK with last place as long as we ended up with a solid understanding of what's working and what's not over the course of the season and made the right adjustments along the way and in the next off season.

    My expectations will be a lot higher next season though. But that's just me.
     
  20. sko16

    sko16 New Member

    May 2, 2007
    Israel
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Israel
    I wouldn't rush into this either. I don't think we'd have to pay for his rights though. The next question is: Who "discovered" Ronaldinho?
     
  21. JazzyJ

    JazzyJ BigSoccer Supporter

    Jun 25, 2003
    Not exactly. It's more like if a "proven striker" couldn't score with the team, then maybe the team should re-think their overall direction. Kind of a stretch, but I wanted to try to work "canary in the coal mine" in here somehow.
     
  22. JohnWP

    JohnWP Member+

    Jun 24, 2004
    Monterey, CA
    Wow, that's a remarkably rational statement. Are you sure you're allowed to post on BS???? I agree with everything you just said. (That being said, I wouldn't mind Huckerby, but as mentioned, a lot of things would have to happen for him to come here. I'm not holding my breath.)
     
  23. Earthshaker

    Earthshaker BigSoccer Supporter

    Sep 12, 2005
    The hills above town
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It was obvious our front line was weak to begin with, and the way the season has played so far has certainly verified that viewpoint, so, I don't think signing a forward now is a "rush" to fix something. The fact that Yallop has brought in brazilians for a tryout and is interested in Huckerby shows he has a solid understanding of the fact that our current front line is not scoring goals. The time for an "adjustment" is now.
     
  24. Roblar

    Roblar Member

    Sep 15, 2000
    The 73072
    I actually think we are better than the standings indicate *right now*.

    While we don't have the talent to win every game, we should be able to play every team to a draw (Dallas). Occasionally, things will go wrong, and the ball won't bounce our way (Chicago), occasionally it will bounce our way (Colorado), but we have no excuse for giving up soft goals and just flat out giving the game away (LA, Columbus).

    If we can get rid of the LA/Columbus debacles, I'll be happy with whatever our standings are at the end of the year.

    Now. Does Huckerby help? Maybe. He's clearly been really good in the past, but the question I'm not capable of answering is: "Why the sudden drop-off this year?" If it is just something silly like being played out of his best position by an idiot manager, well, no problem. But if it is the other side - that the game just passed him by - I'd rather stick with Glinton, Kamara, Cunliffe, and Peguero.

    Actually, I think we need to give the guys on our team more of a chance to develop chemistry before we try to get rid of them. If our forwards have only scored one goal after then next five games..... Well, then maybe it's time to reevaluate things.
     
  25. Childs Play

    Childs Play Member

    Mar 29, 2008
    Behind you,.. BOO!
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Spain
    I completely agree, bringing in Huckerby would only set the teams development back several months. We would do much better bringing in one or two ball control midfielders, in the vein of a Blanco or Schelotto who could actually deliver a good ball to Kamara.

    Bringing in an over the hill forward now, just makes no sense what so ever.
     

Share This Page