Welcome! I don't know why, but I could have sworn you were already a mod, different board maybe. Well, I am going to be behaving myself for quite awhile. I'm already in enough trouble.
Lord have mercy, I just saw the Devil, and he's covered with ice from dead to tail. Lord have mercy, it must be an awful cold day in hell.
I am not a lady nor a troll. Regardless, I opened the thread in a new browser tab. Why would I do that? Was it out of curiosity of finding something ladies may like or was it because I'm gay(not that there's anything wrong with that)? As I pondered the answers to these questions I decided to read the original post. I noticed Sachin's post, what I originally thought was a question, was not a question at all. Sachin is toying with us all. The new moderator is indeed Sachin. Realizing the entire ordeal was some sort of farce, I once again questioned my own sexuality, masculinity and if I am in fact a troll or a troll-like creature. After returning to the thread following several self-checks I concluded I am still a heterosexual, anatomically correct, human male. Analysing the three "heh" followed by an ellipsis followed by a period has led me to believe there may be something else wrong with me or Sachin is some sort of evil genius.
The purpose of this letter is to outline a plan to denounce those who claim that granting Sachin complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. Let me cut to the chase: If one dares to criticize even a single tenet of Sachin's circulars, one is promptly condemned as condescending, indecent, disruptive, or whatever epithet Sachin deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. If he gets his way, none of us will be able to spread awareness of the militant nature of Sachin's treatises. Therefore, we must not let him create an ideological climate that will enable him to create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance. Sachin's contemptible expostulations leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children his enemies? It's an interesting question, and its examination will help us understand how Sachin's mind works. Let me start by providing evidence that Sachin's subordinates get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Sachin, and meeting some other irrational, inerudite fruitcakes is merely a social event. They're not even aware that there are many roads leading to the defeat of Sachin's plans to woo over cold-blooded smart alecks by using tactics such as scapegoating, reductionist and simplistic solutions, demagoguery, and a conspiracy theory of history. I definitely claim that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate. I am on an important mission to encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community. If I don't accomplish that mission, Sachin's plans to formulate social policies and action programs based on the most jaded kinds of lexiphanicism in existence could well succeed. There are no two ways about it; were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be Sachin's most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Sachin to help him stigmatize any and all attempts to maintain social tranquillity. Any correspondence between what he says and the truth is purely coincidental. With this central point cleared up, the rest of Sachin's arguments are rendered moot, as he is an inspiration to footling stirrers everywhere. They panegyrize Sachin's crusade to raise extortionate demands and, more importantly, they don't realize that I undoubtedly hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Sachin does any real damage. Or is it already too late? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that honest people will admit that Sachin's helots mimic Sachin's behavior to the last jot and tittle. Concerned people are not afraid to hold out the prospect of societal peace, prosperity, and a return to sane values and certainties. And sensible people know that Sachin is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Sachin and a pigeon is that Sachin intends to control what we do and how we do it. That's why it would be wrong to imply that Sachin is involved in some kind of conspiracy to use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of superficial bigamists. It would be wrong because his flimflams are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that Sachin keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. The purpose of this deception may be to play on people's conscious and unconscious belief structures. Or maybe the purpose is to spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness. Oh what a tangled web Sachin weaves when first he practices to deceive. I don't wish to psychologize here, but in Sachin's nostrums, academicism is witting and unremitting, yellow-bellied and callow. He revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot. The facts are in: I believe that people are hungry for true information and for a way to work together for justice in every community.
******** you, Sachin!!! ******** you, Sachin!!! Congrats, Sachin, you've finally achieved your life's dream - to become part of the problem Seriously, good luck. well, if you take out the word genius
i have to say from this smart assed thread title i'm really questioning whether or not you are bringing the seriousness and in fact gravity that this moderator job requires.