ONCE AGAIN, the issue has been brought up in the last week. Apparently the press got a hold of some figures. I think the media outlet that released those figures wants its viewers to believe that they actually did get some "ACTUAL" figures from an FMF exec. I havent seen these figures but according to some media outlets, they disclosed 500 player's salaries. Personally, i think a salary should be a private matter when it pertains to the private sector. In this case it should be between the owners and the players. I am only in favor of disclosing salaries when they pertain to public sectors. Everyone knows that Cuauhtemoc is the highest paid player in the MFL. According to the the source, a reporter approched Blanco and wanted to confirm he was really making 31,000 pesos a month. I know that is not true (there is no way he is making 3 thousand dollars a month considering the the real estate he owns, the types of commodities he has or has been seen in public) In reality, I dont see how a reporter or another FMF exec would be able to disclose that information. Its not like a reporter can go to "hacienda" and ask for a players salaryu be disclosed. Those are private matters and can only be released when ordered by the court. AND if they were released, that would be considered a crime. So even before looking at those actual figures, i'm already questioning its validity. But did anyone happen to see those figures? I didnt see them posted on reforma nor universal?
cual es el nombre de ese semanario? esta online, tenes mas detalles de los bien pagados se rumora que ese es el contrato A... el contrato B es el jugoso y desconocido por la federacion, en marzo dicen que se acaba el problema y no mas escondites.... como es eso, se va el super-draf y la forma de mover dineros es mas transparente?
i herd someone commentate in a game when america was playing last year against jaguares and cuah blanco was injure.that america payed blanco 50,000 dollars a game