Should US soccer replicate Brazil's setup?

Discussion in 'MLS: Expansion' started by astabooty, Nov 27, 2004.

  1. astabooty

    astabooty Member

    Nov 16, 2002
    China
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    this is looking years into the future, but would US soccer benefit by having MLS and also a bunch of state/regional leagues?

    Soccer would have to be much more popular in the country, but it would promote more local rivalries and state leagues are feasible due to the size of the US.

    personally i think this would be a good idea in many years if soccer does become big.

    sorry since this isnt exactly fit for this forum.
     
  2. Elninho

    Elninho Member+

    Sacramento Republic FC
    United States
    Oct 30, 2000
    Sacramento, CA
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Would MLS teams also compete in the regional leagues, as in Brazil?

    AFAIK, only Brazil and India use that setup, but in India the Calcutta state league is the only one that is even remotely competitive.
     
  3. Brownswan

    Brownswan New Member

    Jun 30, 1999
    Port St. Lucie, FL
    Which is the top league in Brasil -- Carioca or Paulista?

    Is it true every year they have to assemble a group of teams for a championship? Their big teams stand out, but the organization of leagues baffles me.
     
  4. Crewmudgeon

    Crewmudgeon Member+

    Sep 3, 1999
    Crewdom
    Yes, MLS should emulate the most corrupt and poorly managed soccer league in the world.
     
  5. astabooty

    astabooty Member

    Nov 16, 2002
    China
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    is there really a point to make such a useless response?
     
  6. (TxT)

    (TxT) Member+

    Jun 9, 2004
    Tampa, FL
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd actually like to see MLS replicate the J-League format where they play 2 stages (I think you play each team once in each stage so MLS would need more teams first) and the winners of both stages play eachother in the final, it is simple and competitive.
     
  7. astabooty

    astabooty Member

    Nov 16, 2002
    China
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    i would say yes MLS teams would compete in the regional/state leagues.
    eg: the galaxy, quakes, and chivas would always compete against eachother whether in state leagues or MLS.

    thanks for the info, i had no idea that india used it or that those were the only 2 nations to use it. i wonder how russia works, as they are also a very large country.



    i believe the gaucho, carioca, and paulista leagues are the biggest.

    the national league is like that of most nations; multiple divisions and the winner is selected by points (just stopped using playoffs recently).

    the state leagues i believe are more like a cup as they have groups i believe.


    the point of all of this is that i believe having a more localized competition COULD add a different, nice touch to the game.

    MLS would still most likely be the top competition, but imo it could be very nice in places such as NY/CA to have the major MLS teams, plus lower teams.

    it really is great to be able to travel to every game without too much hassle (sp?), at least i think so.
     
  8. RedMenace

    RedMenace New Member

    Jun 20, 2004
    Palo Alto, CA
    Regional, yes, and I agree with your general thinking, but not down to the state level, at least at the MLS level. I could easily see (some years down the road) MLS with two regions (East/West) of around 16 teams each, with the teams only playing within their region during the regular season, then having crossover playoffs (1st in East vs. 8th in West, etc.) at the end. I'm not sure the top level would ever get to many more teams than this, but I do see that such a regional structure would make a lot more sense for the U.S. than bumping half the teams down to a 2nd division (which I doubt the cities, fans, and owners involved would tolerate). So in this regard it would, like Brazil, go against the typical single table, and against FIFA's attempt to limit league size (which I think is mainly concerned with how many matches teams play during the season, a problem a regional structure could take care of).

    Of course, at lower (minor league/semi-pro/amateur) levels, soccer is already more regional in the U.S. The Premier Development League (the highest amateur level), for instance, has 53 teams in 8 regions, and the higher leagues (USL D1 and D2, formerly A Leage and Pro Soccer League) would too, if they had enough teams. With more teams, even the PDL could be divided into even more, smaller regions.

    And while MLS teams already play some friendlies against nearby teams from lower divisions, I doubt there'd be that much interest in having any kind of regular local league involving teams from such different levels. Maybe, but it's just not something I see happening in a U.S. sport.
     
  9. scaryice

    scaryice Member

    Jan 25, 2001
    Because there's a lot of truth in it?
     
  10. astabooty

    astabooty Member

    Nov 16, 2002
    China
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    how is that relevent in anyway to the discussion? i didnt say follow the league as a whole, just a certain aspect of it.
     
  11. needsashower

    needsashower New Member

    May 2, 2004
    down by the river
    I LIKE this idea! It's similar to my local high school basketball league. I dislike the playoffs but I do like a championshp match.
     
  12. Gioca

    Gioca Member

    Jun 13, 2004
    Hartford
    Club:
    US Città di Palermo
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think we should replicate ideas from Italy, England, Germany and maybe Spain. Possibly we can even look to other European countries. We should complete rehaul MLS to be like those leagues, and not consider anything else.
     

Share This Page