I've read some discussion here lately regarding what is and is not permissible by a PK taker (feignting, etc.). Are there any specific rules or position papers regarding the behaviour of the goalkeeper (aside from not leaving the line until the ball is played)? Would just normal guidelines on USB be in effect? I guess one thing that could be used as an example (mind you I made this up because I think it might be distracting, not because I've done it or would consider doing it) would be perhaps a goalkeeper trying to distract the kicker as he strikes the ball by assuming the Karate Kid Crane Kick position.
I don't think that'd distract anybody. Plus the keeper wouldn't be able to react to anything. Goal, unless the shot's wide.
Basically: i) The keeper cannot step over the goal line until the kicker has touched the ball ii) The keeper can move left and right as long as he/she stays on the goal line iii) The keeper can bounce iv) Both the keepers feet must be on the goal line Crowdie.
I realize this, but what if the 'keeper intentionally engages in distracting behaviour to try to divide the kicker's attention from converting the kick?
Are you looking for some kind of assurances on what will happen if you bust out the Karate Kid Crane move? I think you got your answer from TMagic - it should be an easy goal and you'll look like a fool. But if you do successfully distract the kicker......it would be an epic mind-f@#$. I say go for it. But maybe not in an important game.
If the keeper does anything to distract the kicker he is guilty of unsporting behavior and should be cautioned. If the distraction is successful and the kick misses, retake the PK. Otherwise you let the goal stand. Either way the keeper is getting a card.
I don't know if I agree with this. In extreme cases yes, but what I could see happening realistically (trash talking, hand gestures, etc.) would be fine. I'd allow them, but I still think it'd be stupid. PK takers know what they have to do, and aren't likely to be distracted, a keeper would be better off spending his energy on trying to stop the shot.
Referees only judge actions. We cannot presume to know the impact verbal or physical distractions by a player has on their opponent. We do know they are not allowed through the USSF 7+7 document, which states the following under Unsporting Behavior: "Commits an act deemed by the referee as bringing the game into disrepute (e.g., aggressive attitude, inflammatory behavior, or taunting)" Soccer is played with the feet and body, not with the mouth. Agree or disagree, it is the duty of the referee to uphold the LOTG and, in our case, the interpretations of USSF.
Based on TMajic's response I would not consider him "the choir." I made the comment before because your comments towards whipple were for the most part exactly what he emphasizes the most in his posts. In fact, it was that exchange that prompted my thread for new people to research a bit to find out who is who so they don't butt heads against an established authority without realizing it.