Propongo que dejemos las crusadas en "stand by". Y demos a un candidato a suceder a LaVolpe (despues del 2006 ?) Dar sus meritos como tecnico y por que haria un buen papel con Mexico --que haria para elevar nuestro nivel. Algo asi como ocurrio en la epoca de Menotti-Mejia Baron. Calificar por primera vez a una segunda ronda de una copa del mundo fuera del pais (ademas de ser finalista en la primera copa america que disputamos). Candidatos. Aguirre (de nuez) Vucetich Luis Fernando Tena Hugo Sanchez Alfredo Tena Miguel Herrera Ignacio Trelles Extranjeros Bianchi Capello Rijkaard Cruyff Bielsa Tuca Eriksson Any other you think of ?
and what do they know about mexican football? nothing. we are two years away from germany 06, and if someones gonna takeover it will have to be hugo sanchez. mexico no va hacer nada con lavlope como dt.
Mi principal candidato era Bielsa por su frialdad y es estudioso en tacticas, creo que con el Loco Bielsa no perderiamos ningun partido contra rivales de la Concacaf. Recuerdo el tour de Norte y Centro America que hizo con la Seleccion Albiceleste y no tuvo problemas derotando a Honduras, Estados Unidos y a Mexico. Y se la jugo con una seleccion que habia armado de jugadores suplentes. De todas maneras creo que para volver a tener una buena era con el seleccionado es importante tener una nueva idieologia dentro del equipo. Hugo Sanchez podria cambiar la mentalidad del jugador mexicano como lo llego hacer Menotti. Entonces me inclinaria para tener a Hugo como tecnico de la seleccion nacional. Quizas con Hugo al frente de la seleccion y con las cosas marchando por buen camino podriamos ver a mas jugadores mexicanos pobrando suerte en el extranjero.
Bielsa armo la estructura de fuerzas basicas del Atlas de donde han salido muchos jugadores de primera divison. Por ejemplo Rafa Marquez, Pavel Pardo por mencionar algunos. Eriksson (primer extranjero en dirigir al equipo de la rosa) ha hecho muy bien su papel despues de dirigir en futboles tan diversos como el sueco, el portugues y el italiano. Ha sido el tecnico mas exitoso en los ultimos tiempos con Inglaterra. Dos juegos perdidos en partidos oficiales. Contra Brasil en el Mundial y contra Francia en la Euro. Es muy respetado por los jugadores. Osea, un extranjero si puede dirigir exitosamente a una seleccion nacional. No digo que necesariamente tenga que ser extranjero, por eso puse candidatos mexicanos y extranjeros.
Dear Nubert, Stay on Topic.. Who would you like to have as coach. Not what Lavolpe will achieve with the Mex National team or who should replace him right now..
Nacionales porque me gusta su schema Trejo Tomas boy DeLatorre (Yayo) -This guy is the best coach in Mexico now IMO Extranjeros Benhacker Bianchi
Besides the Copa Libertadores, De La Torre hasnt done much with Santos.. Dont even remind me of his time with Chivas. Miguel Herrera has proven to be a better coach. There should be no doubt that Hugol is the best coach at the moment..
Mexicanos: Aguirre Luis Fernando Tena Extranjeros: Bielsa Eriksson (el que es buen gallo, dondequira canta)
I would like to see Pumas and Monterrey (Hugo and Miguel Herrera) in Copa Libertadores to see how the teams perform against foreign clubs. I think it is a clue on how well they can do with a National Team. Look at Meza, he had all the success you could ask for with Toluca, in our league. But when playing in international tournaments Toluca didn't cut it. Same happened with the National Team he seemed to be out of sorts on the intenational scene. I forgot to add Jose Luis Trejo on the Mexican coaches. He did very well in Copa Libertadores. I would like to see a coach that does a good job for several seasons in our league (like Meza did) but also to have some kind of success in international tournments.
yes, i know this but he has been away from mexico for too long. hireing eriksson would be a waste of money. anyways, last time i checked hes still the top dog in england.
Hugo would be the best guy to try and get Mexico over that hump we have had in terms of mentality. As for player selection or tactics, I'm not sure, I'd have to see. But I know he would command a lot of respect to the players getting called. Definately more than they have now for you know who. Ericksson, I'm not so high on him, he may be okay, but you'd have to pay him absolute gobs of money to get him out of Europe.
they dont need to know anything about mexico. its not like its rocket science. if anything a foreigner would do a better job in picking the best players at the time. they surely wouldnt be calling up some hasbeen they didn know but i still would prefer aguirre, herrera or hugo it has to be one of these three
Easy there little buddy. Cadblur is a respected member of our forum and has simply stated his opinion of Lavolpe's possible successors. Carry on...
l think these should show how biased things have becomed around here. Anybody that doesn´t have Hugo as one of the candidates is a clown or biased. The guy has risen UNAM, is the champion and is right now one of the best coaches out there. If Hugo wants the job, he will probably be the next one. Other guys are Aguirre (who probably won´t return), Herrerra, Trejo and Arias. But some are just jokes. Yayo de la Torre? What has the guy done but fail at Chivas and have Santos as crap. Sure he did well in Libertadores before getting robbed, but it wasn´t that great ouf a performance. Not enough to saved him from the poor league play and defintely not close to even come close to the candidates I mentioned. Anybody who doesn´t have Hugo as one of the candidates is insane.
What? I thought u loved Virrey for Mexico's coach. You whoring yourself out to too many Argies now a days.... Vende Pa..... I thought you hated "Ego Sanchez"? Anyways, My choices for the next M.N.T. coach are: Mexico; Aguirre (again, whishfull thinking) Hugol Trejo Herrera Foreigners; NONE!
My first candidate was Bielsa but he decided to stay in Argentina and from the list of coaches the FMF gave out the one i most liked was Bianchi. Hugo didnt impress me at the time but we can all see his steady progress in the past two years.. No i dont.. I used to enjoy his daily segment in Radio Unica only because he would piss off central americans, lol..
I'm a clown ,I'm Insane,I'm a Cangrejo Hugo is a divisive person who will have half the players thinking like him and the other half resenting him ,that doesnt make him a good coach . If you analyze DeLaTorres style of play and use of resources ,he is a VERY smart strategist . He Also is not a central figure in a game while on the sidelines ,which the players on his team really do apreciate .DeLaTorre does not have the results yet but they will come soon enough . Who was Aguirre as a coach before Pachuca ? Do you guys like his style of play ,or are you impressed by his results in Spain (without Mexican Players ) ? DO you think his strategy Vs. the USA in the WC was the right strategy ?