Thanks for the opinion. Let's see what happens.
I used "all" because all the lawyers I have worked with have considered the merit of a case. context appropriate I thought. For Andy I will...
The lawyers I know at this level wants to win more than make money, not that making money isn't high on their list, just that winning is higher....
So they took a case without merits?
Enough to know all lawyers are not mercenaries. A low reason to take a case doesn't invalidate the merit of a case.
not saying the lawyers won't win financially Only stated the lawyers saw enough merit in the case to take it on Yes the NASL should have gone...
Maybe injunction followed by forced mediation as per FIFA guidelines and if this buy time for the NASL to get closer to twelve and meet standards...
So you think the nasl lawyers doesn't believe the case has merit but is taking the case for the lawyer fee at the cost of losing another high...
That maybe the case, but most reputable lawyers in a specialized field as professional sport make money by winning cases and building their...
The lawyers for the nasl did agree to take up the case an argue the nasl perspective, so yes their lawyers did agree. Didn't think I needed to...
?
I largely agree. I believe there are restrictions per usl as to how many teams within a certain market so if someone wants a second team they will...
1. The NASL believes there is anti competitive consequences of the ussl recent decision to seek an injunction. 2. Some well known lawyers agree...
It is what the NASL charges in the lawsuit. Read it.
I read the lawsuit as declaring that the division standards (it help established) as applied by ussl was anti competitive (conspiracy for monopoly).