With the language you come out with it sounds as if you you are from the UK but said you weren't. Using the the terms "jocks" and "mass immigration" make it sound like you are from the UK considering how much interest you have in UKIP and the Tories forming a government plus your obsession with the so called "UK selling itself to Brussels" makes me think you are actually are from the UK. an yes all your # yes they are all are complete bollocks.
Im not an expert on English but yes something was missing there. As for your question: Yes, we are an unlikely coaliton, arent we? a, I think he is funny as a troll and b, we dont agree on anything except that Cameron should win. He wants him cause he's a troll and I want Dave for the reasons I mentioned earlier.
Who is this George? Happy St George's Day to everyone across England and further afield. We can be proud of our country, of our ingenuity, our industry.— Ed Miliband (@Ed_Miliband) April 23, 2015
How British 'meeja' works - 101... Alarming election blow for Cameron as HSBC threatens to turn its back on the UK for good ... in the Independent, becomes... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...ur-wins-HSBC-exit-could-be-first-of-many.html If Labour wins, HSBC exit could be first of many HSBC, Britain's biggest bank, has announced that it may leave the UK following several increases in the bank levy and post-crisis regulatory changes. Here's why bashing business doesn't pay ... in the Torygraph.
The tories, showing their class, as usual... http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ver-support-the-jew-ed-miliband-10206104.html A Conservative council candidate has apologised after she said she could never support “the Jew” Ed Miliband. Oh, nice...
US tipster Nate Silver: Tories will win most seats – but outcome will be messy http://t.co/4vzuCa2zjf— Kartik Krishnaiyer 🇺🇦🌻⚽️ (@kkfla737) April 28, 2015 http://www.theguardian.com/politics...n-us-2012-predicts-uk-general-election-result
What did Miliband said that has Richard Dawkins all up in arms? Something about reinstating anti-blasphemy laws or such (possibly an exaggeration on Dawkins part). Dawkins elitism really shows up in this twitt. Cameron entrusts major EU decision to economically illiterate plebiscite. Miliband threatens free speech. Vote sensible COALITION partner.— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) April 28, 2015
What coalitons in the UK also have names? Weve got: "traffic light" or the famous "Jamaica" coalition. Do you have that too? Like UKIP+ Tories= full mental?
That guy has never got a UK election right yet I believe but, in this case, he's just predicting the sun will come up tomorrow... er... duh!!! Every OTHER pollster is saying the same thing too.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...lation-surrounding-islamophobia-10203918.html The argument is about making them hate crimes. If it's done properly I can't see too much of a problem with it. As usual, the devil's in the detail.
For 2010 he predicted Conservatives 304, Labour 204, Lib Dem 101. Actual Conservative 306, Labour 258, Lib Dem 57. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/27/nate-silver-labour-swing
What, y'all don't have a entire punditry-industrial complex who are poo-pooing his prognostications on the basis that they saw more "candidate X" bumper stickers in their neighborhood? Seriously, though, he made his name by developing a very accurate mathematical model based on polling data, the relative accuracy of the pollsters producing the data, the number of days until the election, and so on. And while that model is proprietary, the input data is all publicly available, so it's something that anyone could've done, but no one ever did to the same levels of success. So props to him for that, especially since it's yet another blow to the overpaid gasbags on TV and radio who are more committed to blathering about political horse race than to discussing policy. However, it would appear that his models, developed in a political landscape with only two political parties who get appreciable levels of support, don't work as well in a landscape where that's not the case.
Oh, I'm well aware of his success over there but, for the reasons you suggest, it probably ain't gonna work in a system with which he's unfamiliar... but then, why are we listening to him?
Ed meets with Russell Brand, Dave hangs out with Katie Hopkins. at least Ed's was only for an interview. What the F was Dave thinking?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...towards-the-english-says-farage-10210782.html General Election 2015: SNP and its activists 'openly racist' towards the English, says Farage Well, you'd know, wouldn't yer Nigel
If you consider Labour and the Lib Dems as a single party, he wasn't off by much. SMD with more than two national parties isn't supposed to exist anyway, so we can all forgive Nate for not guessing 2010 correctly. Additionally, the Nick Clegg effect hit so hard and fell so fast that his smoothed model didn't have enough time to adjust.