LOL if you watched the game you would know what I am talking about, two rash yellows he didnt even give out warnings went straight to the yellows, bogus refereeing and I havent see any games where bogus refereeing was involved in MX teams lately
Tijuana - Corinthians in TJ (Blown offside’s call); it happens. Even Man U fans complain about bias UEFA refs. But you are like all fans, MLS fans included very selective memory and only see and talk about bad calls when they go against you.
Along with the king of England. They didn´t have 2 golden boots at the award ceremony! Especially when the king already got an award!
Follow ignacio suarez@fantasmasuarezQue bueno que el tuca Ferreti no es DT de la seleccion Mexicana porque al mundial de Brasil mandaria a la seleccion de la liga de ascenso
http://www.concacaf.com/page/CL/NewsDetail/0,,12813~2749511,00.html Now I think is a dumb tie breaker rule, and sure maybe they should have gone by most assists or given out both the trophy but like you said they could only afford to make 1. But Officially Suazo won the Boot, Unofficially you are right and both deserved to have the Boot. So to correct your original statement. Or we can remove the always since 1 Chilean also won it.
damn right, I bet they just made that up to stop the mexican dominance!.........In Mexico he is recognized as also being topscorer.
Yes, they should have called both Golden Boot winners. I think at the world cup they use assists, but I don't think Concacaf tracks that. Another way would be who scored less goals out of PKs. Suazo scored 2 from the spot, Peralta 0. http://www.concacafchampions.com/page/CL/StatsCenter/0,,12856,00.html Since both had 7 goals, I guess if the question is has a Mexican player always finished with the most goals in the CCL your comment would be right, because even with a draw a Mexican player has alwayed finished top or tied for top. So maybe: * Note: 1 year tied for top scorer with a player from Chile.
Wrong there was no bad calls TJ v Corinthians, and this was one bad game the ref called v Seattle sorry I just never seen two yellow cards called in such a short period of time without warning
See you are no different you only remember the bad calls against your team But is ok, refs/linemen blow calls all the time is part of the game, the Xolos goal was very difficult, so I understand the lineman getting it wrong, it was very close. Pause 38 seconds in.
I dont know what your trying to get at with this game and I dont know what it has to do with two yellow cards but the two yellow cards the guy gave out where uncalled for and without warning, it has nothing to do with an offsides call and if you want to go there the guys foot was keeping him onsides
Tuca agrees with you on the first one, not the second one. http://www.socceramerica.com/article/50748/ferretti-playing-against-12-is-harder-than-usual.html You see you are no different.
You know, everyone is trashing Tuca about sending Tigres B, but he was right; the 11 men playing the first half were playing a good game, they were dictating pace, even missed some really clear changes, it should had been enough to win at Seattle. Tuca didn't count on Rivas injury, and the red card to Viniegra, even towards the end of the game Tigres had 2 clear chances... it could had gone the other way. So, what are the dates for the semifinals and who is playing at home first?
Really? I agree with you that Santos played awful to how they usually play... but did you watched how Tigres B were toying with Sounders the whole first half at Seattle, before Rivas injury and the red card...? Santos is not playing good, but Seattle is 10x worse than that. For Sounders to advance they would need another miracle... On the other hand, the Monterrey vs Galaxy series could be more level due to Monterrey's low performance and the good game Galaxy is showing right now... but you never know.
Im not saying they're going to - i still think Santos will take it, im just saying it wont be as shocked if they didnt the way theyve played in two legs against Houston. But they havent looked as sharp as they did last season - they need to handle it in the first leg and dont let one goal decide the second leg.
Could have. But didn't. This was a CL elimination game, why take chances? It took decades to get to this point, who knows when they'll have this opportunity again. I hope they never do with Tuca at the helm. Look at what people are saying about you guys: Sobres raza #Tiguere a festejar este fracasotote de no pasar en la Concachafa con otra invasión!! Por eso no salen del rancho #equipoChico— Milep's (@JorgeDLS23) March 13, 2013 Ni a Marruecos ni a Japón, tu te quedas en Nuevo León #EquipoChico #Normal— Carlos Guerra (@carlosgg_99) March 13, 2013
Or if they had put away their chances at home, if the game was 3 - 0 after the first leg then tigres would be in the semis now.
I don't remember the first, but the second yellow was impossible not to give. It would be a yellow everytime, everywhere. No question. I notice Tuca complained of the referee but agreed with the second yellow with no question.
I dont think he should of been red carded it was too fast, I thought it was suspect that he didnt give any warnings
You don't get a warning for kicking the ball off the field to prevent a restart. Not anywhere. Not Europe, Not in LigaMX, not anywhere. He didn't nudge the ball away -- he booted it off the field. It is instant yellow everytime. Is it not?