"Argentina | La Volpe llama "equipo chico" al seleccionado de Hugo Sánchez" "No tiene el protagonismo que tenía conmigo" http://www.mediotiempo.com/noticia.php?id_noticia=42474 que no mame el wey!!
Whether he's wrong or right, he has every right to criticize Hugo. Hugo spent all 4 years ripping into this guy and not letting him do his job. What goes around comes around. And quite frankly, I find some of his comments amusing so if this novela starts again, it will no doubt be entertaining.
Lavolpe Speaks.... Azteca 2003. Jamaica. Honduras. Brasil 2x. Sufrimos. Peru 2004. Uruguay. Argentina. Defendimos hasta que nos ardio. Gracias al golazo de Morales pudimos superar a Argentina. Y eso que tuvimos a 9 detras del balon en todo el segundo tiempo. Atenas 2004. Feo. Fue horrible. Fue horrible. Alemania 2005. Defendimos hasta la madre con un Japon debil, con una Grecia fea y sin idea. Quedamos cuarto, si, pero de 8? No mames. EEUU 2005. Colombia y Sudafrica. Neta. Nadie se acuerda de eso? Alemania 2006. Le ganamos bien a Iran. Jugamos pa la chingada con Angola. Jugamos hasta peor con Portugal. Jugamos sin tecnico contra Argentina y perdimos con gol afortunado. Entonces? Cuando uno juega con 3 contenciones. Y un par de pendejos arriba. Eso es ser protagonista? No creo que Lavolpa haya dicho eso. Ta muy pendejo. Y el esta bien calladito. No se. Ya dejenlo vivir. La seleccion Mexicana crece. Estamos para mas. Vamos para mas. Dejen el periodismo mediocre. El Proceso II vive.
maybe he`s right to talk this way , i mean you guys remember what hugo did (always talking about lavolpe ) in the other hand thats will give hugo motive to make good record with Mex nacional team .. i already don`t like him because he did not take blanco with him to the WC but lets be Realistic the team with lavolpe was better than now
People are always going to hate, ALWAYS its better just to do your own thing and never pay attention to those people. La Volpe is the same, dejenlo que diga lo que quiera that fool is never gonna direct the Mexican national team.
Payback's a bitch. Hugo thought that no one would criticize him when he would get the team? wrong. Lavolpe has every right to say what he wants, after all, Hugo talked smack the whole 4 years. I'm not saying Lavolpe should be talking, especially when his main goal(5th game) wasn't reached. But if he wants to talk, Hugo should take it like a man just like Lavolpe did.
Lavolpe had been involved in Mexican soccer as a player and a coach for over 20 years. He does deserve some merit for some of his assets: namely player development. Unfortunaltely for him (and for us) his negative intangibles weigh him down tremendously: he is not a winner, and his mouth writes checks that his butt can't cash. I mean, who but Lavolpe could screw up winning a title with a Boca Juniors team that hadn't lost in 2 years before he got there. He has every right to criticize and opinionate, but it makes me laugh that his memory is very selective.
he's using a game that he lost for his argument. hahaha. someone should ask him to look at the difference in the brazil game from copa america 04 and copa america 07, or gold cup 07 and gold cup 05 or ask him why boca jrs won titles both right before and right after he left them what a moron, i sometimes think he has really lost it, might not be all there.
My friend, I like the fact that people like you and others like Geo are gracing our boards, but I think you're completely wrong about Lavolpe. He's completely overated and tooted his own horn. I have no problem with Lavolpe talking about Hugo, lord know he's had it coming. But, there is no way we were better off with Lavolpe. My reasons: we have forwards that are good now, forwards that wouldn't be playing if it weren't for Hugo (Cacho, Nery) We would still be crossing our fingers hoping that Bravo gets one in, or worse yet...Guille. Hugo's squad has already shown growth, now all we need is for him to a chance to the kids.
I thought LaVolpe was a very good tactician. Unfortunately for him, he had a bit of a mouth that very well could have been his undoing. His people skills lacked. The one thing I did like about him is that he didn't pander to the media like Hugo does. Overall Hugo handles his public appearance much better than LaVolpe.
I'll just say this la volpe had his time and screwed up now let Hugo have his and seems Hugo made a good run copa america despite losing to the usa in the gold cup. Now Hugo will have a better squad to work with seeing that half our national team is in europe plus we have now a more balanced team offensivly and defensivly
lavolpe in wc was very bad in the group lavolbe just talk that he play good against argentina and i think that in copa america 2007 the play before argentina not very bad , such lavolpe said ,,
yes i agree with you , Mex did good in copa america except the second half vs argentina lets wait for next matches to see how it will go
Okay lets put it this way remember we lost to Brazil in CA2004 it was ugly and we barley beat Argentina I wouldn't be satisfied by beating a team like Argentina 1 - 0, I would be happy if El tri hammered them say 3 - 0 that would be an upset on their half You have to give Hugo and the players credit they beat a good Brazil side that won this copa america with not having a couple of key players such as Salcido and Orsorio ah I don't think Pardo would have made a difference but I know Salcido alone would have. I was reading something the about two weeks ago something on yahoo sports saying that Argentina said that despite their lost to Brazil they said Brazil didn't bring their monsters I was cracking up when I read this you don't call Alex (psv) Robinho (real madrid) and well you guys know who Brazil brought to copa america with them they brought their A team. The argie weren't just hating on us and at the same time trying to cover their arses from another Brazil defeat!
Mexico v. Argentina 05/06 > Mexico v. Argentina 07 Preguntenle a Rafa quien es mejor entrenador Lavolpe o Hugo y quien cren que diga? Lavolpe. La verdad que los jugadores le tenian mas confiansa a Lavolpe que a hugo y eso que dice? Quiten a Nery de la escuadra y que viera pasado en la Copa America? No metemos golez y a ala chingada para atras a mexico. Pongan a Nery en el mundial, y les aseguro que le ganamos a Angola quedamos en primero y hasta llagamos al quinto. Jugamos mejor con lavolpe pero no estaban los jugadores para triunfar. Con quien contabamos para meter goles? Con Bravo, Kikin and Borguetti? Porfavor.
Nicely said. Lavolpe is a better coach than hugo. With Nery, gio, and (more expeienced) guardado, i think that Lavolpe would acheive more with the team than hugo would.