2010 Seeding Formula: July 2006 update

Discussion in 'FIFA and Tournaments' started by scaryice, Jul 12, 2006.

  1. scaryice

    scaryice Member

    Jan 25, 2001
    The new, revised FIFA rankings are out, so we can get started on this way too early as usual.

    Top 7 teams seeded

    (South Africa automatically seeded as hosts)

    Code:
            		Total	WC	FIFA
    1	Brazil  	61.3	29.3	32
    2	Italy   	58.3	27.3	31
    3	England 	54.3	26.3	28
    4	Germany 	54.3	30.3	24
    5	France  	52.3	23.3	29
    6	Spain   	51.3	25.3	26
    7	Argentina	51.0	21.0	30
    
    8	Portugal	47.3	22.3	25
    9	Netherlands	41.7	14.7	27
    10	Switzerland	35.3	15.3	20
    11	Ukraine 	34.7	16.7	18
    12	Mexico  	34.3	19.3	15
    13	USA     	30.7	13.7	17
    14	Sweden  	30.3	19.3	11
    15	Czech   	29.0	6.0	23
    16	Paraguay	25.7	11.7	14
    17	Nigeria 	24.7	2.7	22
    18	Cameroon	24.0	3.0	21
    19	Denmark 	23.7	7.7	16
    20	Uruguay 	21.7	2.7	19
    21	Cote d'Ivoire	19.0	6.0	13
    22	Croatia 	19.0	9.0	10
    23	Australia	18.3	11.3	7
    24	Japan   	16.3	13.3	3
    25	Costa Rica	13.3	8.3	5
    26	Colombia	12.0	0.0	12
    27	Iran    	9.3	5.3	4
    28	Guinea  	9.0	0.0	9
    29	Romania 	8.0	0.0	8
    30	Honduras	6.0	0.0	6
    [B]31	South Africa	4.0	3.0	1[/B]
    32	Uzbekistan	2.0	0.0	2
    
    
    Much of the following was originally written by eldiablito, so credit to him. Also thanks to him for doing this last time for many months. Apparently he hasn't been online in a month, so I've decided to do it tonight. Plus, I'm up really late when the rankings come out (3 AM central time).

    FAQ

    Why is this list different than FIFA's coke rankings?

    Because Fifa's coke rankings are only part of the complex seeding formula.

    What is the seeding formula used for?

    The seeding formula is used to determine which 8 countries receive seeds. Those 8 teams are heads of each of the 8 groups in the world cup. By being seeded, they get the luxury of not having to play another seeded team until the knockout stage.

    What is the seeding formula exactly?

    The complex formula takes into account the performance at the last 2 world cups and the FIFA coca-cola rankings.

    Part A: World Cup performance = (2002*1+2006*2)/3
    Part B: FIFA Ranking = (12/2006 rank+12/2007 rank+11/2008 rank)/3
    Part A + Part B = world cup seeding formula

    For the purposes of this showing you the current standings in this thread, the current FIFA rank will count as all three years.

    How is the world cup performance determined?

    0 points are awarded if the country failed to qualify that year.
    8 points are awarded for the bottom 8 teams in the group stage.
    9 points are awarded for the top 8 teams in the group stage who didn't advance.

    All the countries that advanced to the knockout stage are placed from 1st place to 16th place. 1st place (champs) receives 32 points. 2nd place receives 31 points. 3rd place receives 30 points. etc. All the way to 16th place which receives 17 points.

    How are the points for FIFA ranking awarded?

    Similarly to above. First, all 32 teams that qualify are ranked by their FIFA ranking. The best is given 32 points. The worst 1 point.

    How do you pick which 32 countries to run the seeding formula?

    I pick the countries based on their FIFA ranking by federation. For example, the best 14 UEFA teams by FIFA ranking since 14 UEFA teams will qualify. This is done primarily for two reasons. It keeps the criteria objective and it runs the formula with the worst-case scenario in mind.

    14-UEFA
    4.5-CONMEBOL
    3.5-CONCACAF
    4.5-AFC
    5.0-CAF
    0.5-OFC

    Are you sure that FIFA will use this seeding formula?

    No, it might change slightly. For 2006 they only used the previous 2 World Cups instead of 3 like before. But they've been using the same basic formula since 1994.
     
  2. scaryice

    scaryice Member

    Jan 25, 2001
    It looks like other than the top 7 and Portugal, the only other teams with a real chance are Sweden and Mexico. They would have to get very high in the FIFA rankings though.

    Even if the USA were #1 in the FIFA rankings, they still wouldn't be seeded currently. Of course, if a few of the teams ahead of us don't qualify then maybe there's an outside shot.
     
  3. Edgar

    Edgar Member

    Using the WC 2006 system to determine the pots:

    Pot 1: Argentina, Brazil, England, France, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Spain
    Pot 2: Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine
    Pot 3: Australia, Costa Rica, Honduras, Iran, Japan, Mexico, USA, Uzbekistan
    Pot 4: Cameroon, Colombia, Cote d'Ivoire, Guinea, Nigeria, Paraguay, Uruguay
    Special pot: Romania

    Mock draw:

    Group A: South Africa, Croatia, Honduras, Uruguay
    Group B: Spain, Ukraine, Japan, Cameroon
    Group C: Germany, Czech Republic, Costa Rica, Nigeria
    Group D: France, Denmark, Australia, Paraguay
    Group E: England, Portugal, Mexico, Guinea
    Group F: Italy, Sweden, Uzbekistan, Colombia
    Group G: Argentina, Netherlands, Iran, Cote d'Ivoire
    Group H: Brazil, Switzerland, USA, Romania
     
  4. scaryice

    scaryice Member

    Jan 25, 2001
    Good job, but South Africa and Nigeria can't be drawn together.
     
  5. Edgar

    Edgar Member

  6. Maruti

    Maruti New Member

    May 14, 2006
    :p

    I would love such a World Cup. Just look at the teams. Almost no weaklings.

    South Africa will most likely have an easy draw, as they will miss any African opposition form the 4 pot meaning they will get at worst teams like Mexico and Paraguay. Plus they have a chance at have a weak European team.

    There will be three/four candidates for groups of death - those hosting Cameroon, Nigeria, Ivory Coast and most likely Ghana (not Guinea).

    Even at your mock draw you have groups with Germany, Czech Rep and Nigeria; with England, Portugal, Mexico and Ghana/Guinea; with Argnetina, Holland and Ivory Coast. Plus you have a high probality of a group of death with such a team as Romania.
     
  7. larrygiterdone

    larrygiterdone New Member

    Jun 7, 2006
    Columbus Ohio

    Group G looks pretty familiar
     
  8. tomwilhelm

    tomwilhelm Member+

    Dec 14, 2005
    Boston, MA, USA
    Club:
    Fulham FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    And H looks like a world of pain. Like Group F this year, only with 3 stronger teams behind Brazil.
     
  9. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    From what I remember (yeah, I could go look it up), this type post from '02 had the seeds accurately. That is, 3 years of confederation cups and qualifying made no difference.

    So, with South Africa hosting, Mexico is shut out. Even more so with the new FIFA ranking formula.

    I suppose, with the shorter window of games being measured and the steep dropoff in the value of games between this year and the previous years, the FIFA rankings will be more volatile. If so, then we should see Asia (yeah, they've drifted away from the 'every 4 years' tournament), Africa, CONCACAF and CONMEBOL countries ranked a little higher at the end of '07 than UEFA.

    Probably won't matter. Looks like this year the US's only shot for many years, maybe Mexico's as well. Needed to get better luck in the draw.

    Sure would like to see someone else sneak in there. Mabye Switzerland with a European Cup homefield advantage win. Wouldn't that be weird.
     
  10. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm confused on Part B. I though they used December of all four years -- 06 - 09. Draw is done in December of '09 for the '10 WC. Aren't you missing a 4th ranking?
     
  11. scaryice

    scaryice Member

    Jan 25, 2001
    Oops, all the years should be moved up by one on my first post:

    12/2007
    12/2008
    11/2009
     
  12. Pingudo

    Pingudo New Member

    Nov 18, 2003
    Santa Cruz
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    I tend to agree, as long as Argentina, Brazil, England, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain qualify for the next WC, they'll almost certainly have a seed.
     
  13. Figo Rules

    Figo Rules Member

    Apr 20, 2005
    Toronto
     
  14. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Ah. Cool. Went back to confirm (just for my own sanity). That looks right now.

    In which case, because everyone but UEFA have confederation championships in 07 and 09, there is a slight chance that someone other than the ones listed could sneak in and capture a seed.

    But not likely.

    Look for two groups of death 4 years from now -- one with the US and one with Mexico.
     
  15. Forza AZ

    Forza AZ New Member

    Jun 26, 2003
    Alkmaar
     
  16. sicnarf

    sicnarf New Member

    Jun 14, 2005
    Edinburgh, UK
     
  17. Shackleton

    Shackleton New Member

    Sep 13, 2005
    N. Texas
    Here's an article on this subject by Paul Marcutti at Planet World Cup. http://www.planetworldcup.com/GUESTS/paul20060719.html and his table showing the current seeding points:

    Code:
                       PWC    RP    TOT
    * Brazil          29.33 32.00 61.33
    * Italy           27.33 31.00 58.33
    * England         26.33 28.00 54.33
    * Germany         30.33 24.00 54.33
    * France          23.33 29.00 52.33
    * Spain           25.33 26.00 51.33
    * Argentina       21.00 30.00 51.00
      Portugal        22.33 25.00 47.33
      Netherlands     14.67 27.00 41.67
      Ukraine         16.67 22.00 38.67
      Mexico          19.33 19.00 38.33
      Switzerland     15.33 23.00 38.33
      Sweden          19.33 16.00 35.33
      USA             13.67 21.00 34.67
      Paraguay        11.67 18.00 29.67
      Ecuador         17.00 12.00 29.00
      Denmark          7.67 20.00 27.67
      Ghana           13.33 14.00 27.33
      Croatia          9.00 15.00 24.00
      Cote d'Ivoire    6.00 17.00 23.00
      Turkey          10.00 13.00 23.00
      Australia       11.33  9.00 20.33
      Poland           8.67 11.00 19.67
      South Korea     15.67  4.00 19.67
      Tunisia          8.67 10.00 18.67
      Japan           13.33  5.00 18.33
      Senegal          8.67  8.00 16.67
      Costa Rica       8.33  7.00 15.33
      Iran             5.33  6.00 11.33
      Saudi Arabia     8.00  1.00  9.00
      Trinidad & Tob.  5.33  3.00  8.33
    * South Africa     3.00  2.00  5.00 
    
    The teams that are likely to be seeded for 2010 have an asterisk (*) in front of their names 
    Note that there are some slight discrepancies between scaryice's and Marcutti's tables. I guess it is because they look at a slightly different 32 teams to make the 2010 WC.

    For those new to the seeding formula threads, I believe Marcutti's similar article regarding the 2006 seeds was the genesis for all subsequent seeding formula updates.
     
  18. Edgar

    Edgar Member

    It's Marcuccitti, not Marcutti. He's a member on this forum: Paul Marcuccitti
     
  19. Shackleton

    Shackleton New Member

    Sep 13, 2005
    N. Texas
    Apologies to Paul; just trying to give credit, where credit is due. :)
     
  20. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    Holly crap. You guys don't let up. Find something else to do !!! The damn thing is 4 years away !!! :rolleyes:
     
  21. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Just to torture you, a new Ranking is out. Time for an update!

    :D

    Almost no movement in the top 20, so things are probably exactly the same as a month ago.
     

Share This Page