On one of the other threads- someone mentioned that a thread on German strikers should be started. So- here it is. I was wondering if Klinsi would carrry 4 or 5 strikers. I think having Ballack on the attack- Germany could get by w carrying 4 strikers. My choice: 1) Podolski 2) Klose 3) Neuville 4) Hanke or Kiessling (I've seen a few peole mention Thurk)---Anyway----who do you think will be selected. ?
poldi, klose, neuville and Asamoah will be chosen. its alright because asamoah will warm the bench. but he too can score . i would have liked to see thurk
I guess Klinsmann will go with Klose, Podolski, Asamoah, Kuranyi and Neuville but I would prefer Hanke or Kiessling over Kuranyi.
Ballack being a forward would be a complete waste of time and we would be definitely be gone in the first round. 1) Klose 2) Podolski 3) Kuranyi 4) Neuville
Hanke out first 2 games, and has actually played worse than Kuranyi. But I will give you that Hanke has less support in Wolfsburg. Kiessling....has done well. But I think Vittek and Schroth have done better as a tandem for FCN. I think we should also save him for U21 championships.
Klinsi's said that he's taking 5 forwards to the WC. Article Link According to the article, Klose, Podolski, Kuranyi and Asamoah are the top 4 picks up front, with Neuville and Hanke battling for the 5th place. IMO, Neuville shouldn't even have to battle with Hanke for the 5th place. My 5 would be: (* denotes starters) Klose* Poldi* Kuranyi Neuville Asamoah Overall I don't mind this 5-some. Kuranyi as a backup to Klose (which hopefully shouldn't have to requiring "backing up". Neuville and Asamoah can add their presence as 2nd half subs. Asamoah is also versatile enough to play as a right sided midfielder should the oppurtunity have to arise, which makes him a nice addition IMO. Kuranyi's poor form is worrying (as it had been for us Schalke fans as well), but he has a good record in the NT (he scored 10 goals for us in 2004), and honestly is not as bad as many here are making him out to be. Hanke is in just as poor of form as Kuranyi (if not worse), and would miss the first 2 games anyways. In terms of Kiessling, he's untested at the international level, and I think many people are somewhat overrating his performances this year. He's spent the majority of the 2nd half of the season as a subsitute as well. I agree with TOLH, that Kiessling should be saved for the U21s (as should Trochowski and Fathi).
This is tough and I'm sure Klinsman will surprise a few of us with his selection but here is what I would like to see, keeping in mind how much each of these players can actually contribute to our team: 1. Klose 2. Podolski 3. Neuville 4. Hanke I don't think we will need a fourth striker in the opening two games and Hanke is a player with some flare and spirit that also has a strikers instinct, two qualities combined whereas Asamoah and Kuranyi each own one of those qualities only. Hanke is a risk though because he is young and free sprited on the pitch in a sense, while being fearless and experimental, he could also prove lackluster in workrate and overall contribution to the team effort.
Excellent insight, ForeverRed ! Hanke DOES have "strikers instinct"! German NT needs that. I, too, feel that Klinsi will surprise w his selection of strikers. ---------AND..........whatever happened to Martin Max?
No kidding....However Hanke fits in better with Klinsmanns "rejuvenation" stradegy. Old farts like Neuville are history as far as he is concerned. Klinsmann will chose Hanke......and once again make a wrong decision. However I'd chose Hanke over Assamoa or Kurnayi any time.
True, but he never got a chance to prove his ability. Only Poldi, Klose, Lauth, Kuranyi should be in the squad. Noone else has really deserved to be called.
Hmm... I support Hanke and Kiesling, becuase I do not wish to see both Podolski and Kuranyi play at the same time. Kuranyi looks like the kind who will get bullied by opposite defenders.Same goes for Podolski. So should Klose miss a match in the World Cup, or be injured, there should atelast be a striker who will not be pushed around. Thats why I'd pick Asamoah or Hanke or even Bobic . I agree Kuranyi has scored quite a few goals for the NT and his strike rate is good too, but he has been injured and hasn't done much in the last few months.
I do hope Klinsi gets some "new blood" into the strikers. I've heard good things about Kiessling too. (re; Martin Max--I was just being facetious---but- just trying to point out how badly we need strikers. Maybe Klinsi should work out a few weeks & activate himself! lol
you are right asomoah and kuranyi will dissapoint german fans to death if podolski or klose gets injured
Klose Podolski Kiessling for the fourth spot its a choice between crap and crap: Hanke, Kuranyi, Asamoah, Neuville I'm not fond of choosing one of them
Neuville is fast crap. Oh man...I had a joke about this, but I don't think I should say it. It might give people the "runs." ********!
No, he has one good game and the next 9 games of him are usually crap (same goes for Hanke, Kuranyi, etc)
It´s not important, who of them will be nominated by Klinsmann. He only needs to have the feeling for choosing the right day to put them on pitch (only at their good day).
[QUOTE="Eisenfuß" Eilts]It´s not important, who of them will be nominated by Klinsmann. He only needs to have the feeling for choosing the right day to put them on pitch (only at their good day). [/QUOTE] I know what you mean. It will be like a lottery. If you pick the right numbers you could be lucky. Before each game Klinsmann should put all the numbers in a hat and draw two to play. With that he might even be able to surprise the opponent's coach . On the other hand if that would result in teaming up Neuville and Asamoah the soccer world would have at least a good laugh...
Sorry, but someone who has never played a game for the NT a month before the WC should not be named to the squad. If he belongs on it he should have been brought in a long time ago to get some experience.
Oh yeah, what an argument The sole criteria for nomination should be the quality of the player and not the overall nominations. Furthermore, it is about personal opinions in this thread, if you don't like mine than I'm fine, but I won't change my opinion because of your silly argument Furthermore, you can't logically justify normativ statements liek the one you made
OK, and how can you adaquately asses his quality for the national team when he HAS NEVER PUT THE SHIRT ON? I'll reiterate my point: If he belongs on the team he should have been brought in a long time ago to get some experience. You don't put someone with zero experience at this level and zero experience working with the other national team players out on the field for the first time in a World Cup. He may be Jesus is soccer boots, but unfortunately the time to bleed new talent for this world cup passed a couple months ago.