What serious and respectful moderators do whenever they find out that some moderators are worst than regular posters?
I've always found it strange how apparently mods are the ones at fault for a poster breaching the TOS
I've always wondered why someone who is Corrupt would be made a moderator. I had someone recently hack into my account and delete my sig, you wouldn't know who is was would you?
Good question, especially when there are such upstanding posters like you around to choose from instead I might be wrong here but I'm guessing it was the yellow card fairy
Agreed, when you reach the eliteness of posting that i have reached you should be made mod. Unfortunately i don't have a clean infraction record which is holding me back. I actually lost the sig a few days before i received the yellow. Im assuming it would be someone corrupt who has a history of breaking in to other posters acounts and doing other corrupt actions. Do you have any ideas who it could be?
Yes, whenever your name comes up in mod discussions we always lament your harsh and obviously undeserved infraction record as the only reason why you can't be elevated to modship. Given the clear insinuation of this comment care to tell me what this supposed history of mine is as it's news to a luddite like me
It's nice to see im often involved in mod discussions. Im just going to name a few i don't want to be here all day. -You've deleted threads when nothing was wrong with them just to suit yourself. -You've edited posts despite nothing being wrong with them. -You've giving infractions just to show you have the power too. -You've corrupted peoples posts and made them look bad. -You've hacked into posters acounts and changed settings, sigs, etc. -You've closed threads before the post count was up. And there are many more which i will be eventually named.