Trump Presidency Tweets Too

Obvs.

 

"#butheremails"

Can you please explain to us the issue again? 20 paragraphs will suffice this time.

 

As an extremely innocent law-abiding person I often begin sentences with “my crimes.”

— The Volatile Mermaid (@OhNoSheTwitnt) September 20, 2019

 

Didn't work before. Why would it now? You sure as shit haven't gotten any smarter.

 

Well, maybe you ought to look at the depth of the argument, specially that part of #bothsidesdoit...

Anyways, maybe I'm not smarter but a little wiser. In the last two years I learned not to take democracy for granted and also not to expect any help from InCents and InThirds when trying to save it. Some people will just find extraordinary ways to say that smart, career service oriented people with flaws, working within the limits of a flawed government but trying to make the best out of it, are just equals to career criminals, grifters, morons and evil white supremacist yearning for an authoritarian nazi type kakistocracy.


Oh and I also learned a new word and coined a few new terms!!!

 

So precious.

 

Anyways, while we are discussing how pansuits are terrible for democracy, Betsy Amway is going full Christer Shania:

Do you know what it feels like to read this as an American Muslim? https://t.co/WHnbwwhOKp

— Hend Amry (@LibyaLiberty) September 20, 2019

 

....statement. Strange that with so many other people hearing or knowing of the perfectly fine and respectful conversation, that they would not have also come forward. Do you know the reason why they did not? Because there was nothing said wrong, it was pitch perfect!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 20, 2019

Is this what Trump really said? This is just a tweet of a headline from god knows where.

 

There are 654 miles of border wall in the U.S., according to Customs and Border Protection data, the same number of miles that existed at the start of his term. https://t.co/vdykvUTLYX via @janestreet

— Evan Rosenfeld (@Evan_Rosenfeld) September 20, 2019

1174712499905552385 is not a valid tweet id

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/09/donald-trump-tax-returns-lawsuit

But you're correct, they're "paraphrasing"... Its lawyers are the ones arguing that.

 

OK it’s his lawyers saying he can’t be investigated.

 

1174633444091006976 is not a valid tweet id

 

OK, nobody who purported to care about Hillary endangering security, or not following regulations, or anything else that ever might have anything to do with any email that she ever sent, and ever will send, was sincere.

 

Nice framing.

Nobody, eh?

 

Trump urges "someone" to look into Joe Biden pic.twitter.com/YqYg1ENbAs

— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) September 20, 2019

“I don’t know who it is but I know they’re a partisan.”

I’ll say it again...it’s embarassing enough the president is a conman. It’s triply so that he is SO BAD at it.

I am NOT Montel Williams!

 

I don't remember who it was, but somehow I think I remember someone writing tomes upon tomes about data encryption and security of electronic documents and how Hillary was certainly guilty of all sorts of things, whether she was aware of the technical ramifications or not. After all, ig-nints of the law is NO excuse! She should know better and besides, national security is at stake! Surely some guy named Sergei or Yuri (or maybe just some 400-lb guy lying on his bed) is busy hacking and we MUST keep all our national security buttoned up like a drum.

I don't remember who that guy was. Anyone else remember? Nah, maybe I'm just imagining it...

 

Yup, he was coached before his confirmation hearing by the Best.

 

Rudy was a successful prosecutor at one time. How does he trip over his braciole all the time now? Gotta be senility

Rudy denying he asked Ukraine to investigate Biden followed by Rudy admitting he asked Ukraine to investigate Biden within 30 seconds of each other in this clip is just incredible to watch pic.twitter.com/Vx1fTrEz8Q

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 20, 2019

 

Something something States rights:

She’s lying.

The Clean Air Act explicitly gives California the authority to request its own standards. Other states are free to use California standards, but only if they want to.

Did I mention she’s lying? https://t.co/ee169GcQDq

— Ed Overbeek (@EdOverbeek) September 20, 2019

But but individual freedoms!!!

.@ICEgov acting director is asking you to be kind to them because they are not Nazis who put kids in cages. pic.twitter.com/uPsORBASBN

— ALT-immigration (@ALT_uscis) September 20, 2019

And something about Hillary being a hawk:

Trump just said it would be “the easiest thing” and “the easiest decision” to go into Iran militarily. Let that settle in: a commander-in-chief saying the decision to send men and women into combat, into harm’s way, would be the “easiest decision” for him.

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) September 20, 2019

 

How do the people why decry California's market being able to set de facto automobile standards feel about the Texas School Book Commission?

 

"Forget it Jake. It's Chinatown."

In my moments of despair, that's what I say to myself.

I feel half insane, just because the alternative to me being insane, is that I'm sane, but everyone else is crazy.

 

States rights trump federalism, unless the states are liberal.

 

There's a lot of educational publishing and editorial work in Chicago. TEKS is something they always bring up. One thing I never figured out is why a dozen or so states comprised of roughly 110 million people don't set up their own collective standards board to counteract this. Which market are people publishers going to more care about? The 110 million market or the 30 million market?

It's not like people schools Arkansas or Kentucky buy books, but I've gotta imagine that if their school systems got lost on the internet and wound up accidentally buying textbooks, it's a lot cheaper to buy textbooks that were developed for the larger market.