Trump Presidency Tweets Too

Do they lie.

 

Mislead.

 

They're definitely left leaning but usually have a link to the original story. If anyone is mislead then they're not reading it all.

 

And it didn't cost them $130k!!

In other words, they "pulled out" before it was too late. https://t.co/2gfmNnJnOK

— Covfefe Shecky Jones,King Of Shade👑 aka BROLENE🔞 (@King_Of_Shade) July 10, 2019

Good thing he got bone spurs and no kidney stones..

TRUMP: "You've worked so hard on the kidney. Very special -- the kidney has a very special place in the heart. It's an incredible thing." pic.twitter.com/JLM3uCsO5u

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 10, 2019

Douche-Bank:

Trump reportedly took out $2 billion (TWO BILLION) in loans just from Deutsche Bank https://t.co/cL7gHCBTZ5 https://t.co/NK4g3ZcMJa

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 11, 2019

 

Here's a leader from their latest post, complete with credits and link to the original story.
Tell me where it's wrong or misleading.

Ignoring SCOTUS, Trump expected to claim unilateral power to add citizenship question to Census by executive action
Published 34 mins ago on July 11, 2019
By David Badash, The New Civil Rights Movement

 

I get the feeling that the administration is testing this not because they care so much about the actual question, but rather because they want to see what happens when they just straight up ignore the Supreme Court.

 

Makes Sense...

Ooooh, now I get it.
Trump has a kidney where normal humans have a heart.
Explains why he’s so full of piss and vinegar. https://t.co/i4kBLFwHBJ

— Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (@ananavarro) July 11, 2019

Party Time:

1/ To be clear, the attendees at this party were (and this is a full list):

* Donald Trump
* Jeffrey Epstein
* 28 womenhttps://t.co/N7nD5jZJOJ

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) July 11, 2019

 

That is a male standing to the left of Trump and Epstein. Also, while the party looks to have been sordid, those are clearly adult women.

 

Illigal vs undocumented worker.

Both are "accurate", both can be used in a way to make a point.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/

According to this, their accuracy is "mixed"

A half truth and an unproven are not bad, now they do little original content, so as a percentage of original I am not sure if it is higher or lower than "non-bias" sources. 'Mixed' score seems harsh.

according to that website, they do get a better "grade" than the right wing website they were created to contradict, the drudge report. Drudge has multiple false and pants on fire (they list just a few below).

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drudge-report/

 

I think he's just trying to keep it in the news. By doing so he continues to scare immigrants into not filling out the census form, which is the primary point.

It's also red meat for his voters, which I'm sure is never far from his thoughts.

 

Click bait didn't answer the question. Nobody else had this story up and it's definitely relevant. Or tell me why it's not or why it's wrong.
So far click bait and It's shit doesn't cut it other than to reflect your attitude towards it.
Me, I'll continue to use that site among several others I check daily.
Or I could just go to Fox News Tv.

 

I try and stay away from the added click bait! Story's. how to have a bigger dick in 3weeks. Or you too can have bigger breasts.

They do publish newsworthy articles along with their sources.

 

More outlets have the story.

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/worl...-2-of-them-and-28-girls/ar-AAE6CRl?li=AAgfIYZ

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/07/trump-and-epstein-and-28-girls-new-york-times

Those outlets clarify the source.

one story goes on farther.

BTW, the original NY times report did not come up (or I missed it) in my quick google search.

 

Soooo...

The Left Media has to go through Purity Tests, while in general terms it is not inaccurate an rather trust-worthy...

Right Wing media can publish Set Rich or Pizza Gate or Jade Helm and their followers will take it at their word...

 

Racist Fractions work differently apparently:

Not only is this sexist, racist and pathetically vain, but a true stable genius would understand how fractions actually work. https://t.co/5IpSXWYO2l

— Adam Best (@adamcbest) July 11, 2019

 

But that's the thing, as a general rule, Left of the spectrum sites tend to be more accurate by a mile. The information in ussscouse's post was correct but you are questioning the source, basically because at times they embellish the headlines.




As long as no one posts from the bottom red rectangle, I am Ok with the information provided, but as we have discussed in the media thread, even those organizations at the top of the green quadrant have shown a bias towards republican and establishment point of views, so in general terms, one should be careful with almost any time of information.

Personally speaking, I think that Rawstory is a good agregator for some news that fly under the radar, and also for social media reactions, and you usually can find the actual source rather easily. All in all, I do think that chastising a poster for not triple checking a rather safe source is uncalled for.

 

So going by the chart you posted, you would trust a Drudge report story?

 

The box steps up. CNN is the lowest reliable source.

Interesting that Mother Jones is above the line. I guess that their quality pieces outweigh the drivel that pops up often.

 

Anything to the right of The Economist in Yellow, Orange or Red quadrants should be looked at with extreme distrust. Anything bellow Yellow on the left I'd take with a grain of salt. That's where I'd place Rawstory.

 

I think the drudge should be red, but the legend does warn about orange and red.

For Yellow they do say fair interpretation of the news, so technically it would be trustworthy but with perhaps bias language.

One thing people should take into account is Opinion pages vs regular content.

The Christian science monitor news section is top notch, the opinion articles, not so much.