Trump Presidency Tweets Too

He deleted the rant, blamed Twitter, then deleted the tweet blaming Twitter:

1130438277385687041 is not a valid tweet id

 

Thanks, that is not something I would have guessed.

Not just clunky, but down right stupid.

 

And she is not wrong, the 2 state solution is dead, it has been dead for a long time, we just pretend that it is not dead, because dealing with a 1 state solution is also very difficult, there can be no Jewish-democratic Israel on a 1 state solution, unless there is massive war.

 

He does cover his basis, he gave a very long (one tweet at a time) detail reason behind his conclusions.

We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degrees—on the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justice—depending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.

— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019

Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.

— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019

 

Those are the 2 that I really do not want, but one of them is who we are going to have at the end.

 

Vicente Fernandez is (was) a great singer, but him being homophobic does not shock me at all, he basically represents the Macho Mexican culture.

 

The wife may also be evangelical, I mean she married him.

 

Certainly possible, but at least she warned him before the election. He, being the head, just didn’t listen to her and assumed God would protect his family while allowing other families to be torn apart. #Faith

 

That truck tailgate thing can’t be real even if I would like to think it is. Maybe a performance art kind of thing?

 

Moar Winning!!!

MORGAN STANLEY: IF U.S.-CHINA DON'T AGREE TRADE DEAL AND U.S. IMPOSES 25% TARIFFS ON THE REMAINING $300 BILLION OF IMPORTS FROM CHINA, WE SEE THE GLOBAL ECONOMY HEADING TOWARDS RECESSION

(via @Reuters)

— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla) May 20, 2019

This is not about regulating vags...

Wait... Actually is only about regulating vags...

1130485548362035202 is not a valid tweet id

 

And the vags are speaking:

We asked women across the state to share their experiences and thoughts on what it's like to be a woman in Alabama today. Today, we share their stories with you.

It’s time to hear Alabama’s women https://t.co/e3TMlMtJvc pic.twitter.com/uarBG2MENF

— AL.com (@aldotcom) May 19, 2019

 

I disagree, smart women should just enter into lesbian relationships.

 

I wouldn't want to prosecute a case in which a woman gave consent, the man penetrated her, and then she changed her mind. Ain't no way 12 people could hear that evidence and none of them would have reasonable doubt. Once the man gets on the stand and gives his side of the story, most or all jurors would have reasonable doubt.

Seems like a smart clarification of the law...it avoids wasting time on such cases.

Let's separate right and wrong from convictable and not convictable. The first is morality, the second is politics.

I hope I don't come across as some kind of rape apologist, but let's get away from virtue signaling and talk about the real world of trials.

 

The current law is that a woman can't withdraw consent. The proposal is to change this and put NC in line with just about every other state.


PS: Apparently the proposal to change this isn't really getting anywhere.

 

I never understood how this kind of things have an expiration, but here we are:

1130501335328206848 is not a valid tweet id

 

Trump and his junta don care about FGM because he knows his base doesn't care. It's not like its harming a fetus.

 

Ah, so NOW Amash is useful.

 

It is still be hard to prove, but I assumed that what they mean with withdrawing consent is if the women telling the partner to stop and if the partner does not stop, then it becomes rape.

 

The law is one thing. Discretion with respect to what is prosecuted given circumstances is another. In many cases, the justice system isn't going to bother prosecuting if consent is withdrawn in the middle of sex, but I can see a lot of scenarios where a jury would convict. Things become violent, etc. JMO, but the definition should be expansive enough to provide the justice system the opportunity to bring charges and try the case.

 

That's exactly what they mean and as the law is written (according to things I've read), if a man and women are having sex, the woman rescinds her consent and the man doesn't pull out, it doesn't meet the legal definition of rape in NC. If she rescinds consent and he pulls out for whatever reason (no matter how brief), any subsequent penetration is rape.

 

For safe sex, be sure to wear a condom and dash cam.

 

Trump’s jealous that Fox News is seeing other people. Totally normal.

— Schooley (@Rschooley) May 20, 2019

 

I mean, probably they're right.. Reminds me of someone else...

‘Hitler was actually an incompetent, lazy egomaniac and his government was an absolute clown show’

‘wouldn’t get out of bed until after 11 a.m., and wouldn’t do much before lunch other than read what the newspapers had to say about him’ 🤔https://t.co/wkegTmoalE

— RynheartTheReluctant (@TheRynheart) May 20, 2019

 

About a year or two ago on I-75 in Ohio I saw such a truck. All Donald Trump themed. Such things do exist.