The US Supreme Court Thread

Kavanuts is a far right wing nut, and he replaced a lean-right centrist. I'd expect the balance to be very different now just on that consideration.

 

Democrats go after Kavanut's records:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...-service-bush-white-house-n1039656?yptr=yahoo

 

Now?

 

Yeah, too bad there wasn't a chance to ask him about his work as a professional hack in the Clinton years and then open up a line of inquiry about Trump (and the GOP as a whole) using the Supreme Court as a patronage gig.

That's what ambassadorships are for.

EDIT: ah, during the Bush years.

Still. . .

 

Impeachment is the action for Supreme Court justices.

 

Moscow Mitch is laughing in a corner somewhere while Master Legislator Pelosi writes out excuses.

 

Impeachment is too complicated for the American public to understand, so why bother trying?

Sigh...

 

It is not "in theory." It is the actual method for removing a sitting US Supreme Court judge.

Your theory was to ask the Executive for a sitting Supreme Court judge to "step down." THAT has no bearing in reality.

I did not say that "this Congress" would do so.

It is a lifetime appointment, it could happen in a future Congress.

 

Have you taken into account just how far PJ & Squi would go to defend their HS lifting buddy?

 

Yeah now. During the vetting process our favourite turtle necked senator from Kentucky stopped anyone looking at his records. Then the dick waving, woman assaulting, beer drunkard got a free pass.

I Like Beer !!!

 

Fyp.

The above is 100% true. We can argue that the House should investigate and impeach anyway to get things on the public record, or not. If you think they should, then add spineless in front of Dems above.

But there is almost completely certainty (a99.9% chance) the Senate will do nothing, and therefore the House Dems know they can’t win.

*I’m reserving a 0.1% chance of impeachment in the event that there is video footage of Kav running a 12 year old girls slave auction or something like that.

 

If they’re not unborn people, they’re on their own. They probably tricked Brat into having too many beers, because we all know he loves beer.

 

Fine Dershowitz...or is it Roy Moore. They’re 8. Are you happy now?

 

I'm not arguing for 8 as age of consent.. But again, out of the womb, they stop being babies needing protection and become temptresses to pure young Christian males of 40+.

 

Was he that close to Hillary Clinton? Maybe he also hung out at Comet Ping Pong.

 

Good question. Only those missing emails from Killary will reveal the truth.

 

This could be a real disaster for democrats and democracy as RGB gets checked for Cancer.

Edit:
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg this week had underwent a procedure to treat a tumor from her pancreas, a court spokesperson tellsWashington Post reporter Robert Barnes.

According to the Court, “the tumor was treated definitively” with radiation “and there is no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body.”

 

She should be OK if the Court's statement is true.

 

We have to hope. Can you imagine who the next Trump nominee might be? Roy Moore or Jay Sekulow

 

Or.......... Bill Barr..!

 

I was thinking Rudy Giuliani.

 

Too old.

It's going to be a 45 year old who spent his 20s doing hackwork for the George W. Bush administration and his 30s coming up with semi-legal means of undermining Obama policies.