The Possibility of a USA Seeding

Discussion in 'USA Men: News & Analysis' started by Dignan, Oct 16, 2009.

  1. beamish

    beamish Member+

    Jul 6, 2009
    But honestly: what teams would have been ahead of us if those 3 failed to qualify? The list is very, very small.

    They could have gone by the most recent FIFA rankings, in which case Greece and Cameroon would have been ahead of the US.
     
  2. uclacarlos

    uclacarlos Member+

    Aug 10, 2003
    east coast
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    Spain
    Just to be clear, what I'm defending isn't the desperate, futile hope of getting a seed. I hated this thread title when it came out and said so, b/c by then it was an absolute impossibility for us to be seeded.

    What I'm trying to point out is that at some point during the summer, it wasn't that remote of a possibility b/c of Argentina, France and Portugal AND the fact that nobody anticipated them using FIFA rankings as the sole determinant factor of seeding.

    Using the 2006 model, when you took out Arg/Fra/Port... we were w/in reach of a seed.
     
  3. beamish

    beamish Member+

    Jul 6, 2009
    Right. I bet that if the US had won, say, three or four of the eleven games they drew or tied last year they would be seeded. But soccer is hard, especially when you're playing good teams.
     
  4. Jordan21

    Jordan21 Member

    Dec 23, 2005
    Alabama
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm so glad we weren't seeded.... see draw = )
     

Share This Page