The Official 2019 San Jose Earthquakes related Blogs/Press thread

Discussion in 'San Jose Earthquakes' started by Goodsport, Jan 4, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. don gagliardi

    don gagliardi Member+

    San Jose Earthquakes
    Feb 28, 2004
    san jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    bsman repped this.
  2. bsman

    bsman Member+

    May 30, 2001
    MadCity
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    don gagliardi repped this.
  3. don gagliardi

    don gagliardi Member+

    San Jose Earthquakes
    Feb 28, 2004
    san jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    tenfourteen repped this.
  4. jeff_adams

    jeff_adams Member+

    Dec 16, 1999
    Monterey, Ca
    Forbes ranks the Earthquakes as the 16th most valuable MLS team at $275 million. Values across the league have surged 30%.
     
    Antonio2020 repped this.
  5. don gagliardi

    don gagliardi Member+

    San Jose Earthquakes
    Feb 28, 2004
    san jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
  6. don gagliardi

    don gagliardi Member+

    San Jose Earthquakes
    Feb 28, 2004
    san jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Antonio2020 repped this.
  7. bsman

    bsman Member+

    May 30, 2001
    MadCity
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Take it easy, Don. Have some nice wings with










    Ranch dressing.... :whistling:
     
  8. mjlee22

    mjlee22 Quake & Landon fan

    Nov 24, 2003
    near Palo Alto, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hey that’s in line with our final 2019 standings of 15th!
     
    bsman repped this.
  9. mjlee22

    mjlee22 Quake & Landon fan

    Nov 24, 2003
    near Palo Alto, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  10. don gagliardi

    don gagliardi Member+

    San Jose Earthquakes
    Feb 28, 2004
    san jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Cincinnati is more valuable than the Quakes?
     
    mjlee22 and 2in10 repped this.
  11. jeff_adams

    jeff_adams Member+

    Dec 16, 1999
    Monterey, Ca
    The values do not include stadiums or real estate. Avaya probably puts the Quakes a little higher
     
  12. Antonio2020

    Antonio2020 Member

    Nov 28, 2016
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    How, or why, is Cincinnati valued higher than SJ? If market has anything to do with Forbes numbers (since apparently real estate and stadiums don't), then we should easily be top 5 (Silicon Valley, Bay Area). Doesn't make sense IMHO..
     
  13. jeff_adams

    jeff_adams Member+

    Dec 16, 1999
    Monterey, Ca
    Merchandise sales and attendance might favor Cincinnati
     
    DotMPP, mjlee22 and Antonio2020 repped this.
  14. bsman

    bsman Member+

    May 30, 2001
    MadCity
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Or perhaps the fact that Cincinnati fans have only had to put up with one year of futility compared to our ten years may factor into it...
     
    hc897 repped this.
  15. don gagliardi

    don gagliardi Member+

    San Jose Earthquakes
    Feb 28, 2004
    san jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Cincinnati revenue is listed as "n/a", and a $10 million delta between relative values suggests a heckuva lot of merchandise sales.

    As I suggested earlier, the valuations are damn lies and statistics -- with a side of ranch dressing. :)
     
    Antonio2020 repped this.
  16. Antonio2020

    Antonio2020 Member

    Nov 28, 2016
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Not that Fisher will sell anytime soon (unfortunately), but if the Quakes were put on the market today I say they would fetch at least a cool $300 million easily (team plus stadium, land/footprint). Just my opinion of course.

    Said it once and I'll say it again: Fisher should just deed the Quakes (including stake in MLS/SUM) to the Giants for the right to move A's to SJ (which is really what he and Wolff wanted in the first place). $275 million value (for the Giants to either flip or run the Quakes franchise themself) not a bad price for SJ/SCCo. What do you say John?!...
     
    bsman repped this.
  17. tvromero

    tvromero Member

    Jun 2, 2018
    It says our revenue is $35M and we spent $40M to get that. Where the heck are we spending $40M a year? Our player salaries are just over $9M.

    Is the value to take care of the stadium included but not the value to the stadium?

    BTW, when you have no Jersey or Stadium sponsor, you have no one to blame but yourself for losing money.
     
    Antonio2020 repped this.
  18. falvo

    falvo Member+

    Mar 27, 2005
    San Jose & Florence
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    If Fisher hangs on to the club for another 5-10 years, he will double that amount.
     
  19. Earthshaker

    Earthshaker BigSoccer Supporter

    Sep 12, 2005
    The hills above town
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
     
    TallSierra and don gagliardi repped this.
  20. bsman

    bsman Member+

    May 30, 2001
    MadCity
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    The costs associated with building the stadium are probably being amortized over a specific time period. You don't expense an asset as you build it. Accounting 101! :)
     
    2in10 and TyffaneeSue repped this.
  21. SoccerMan94043

    SoccerMan94043 Member+

    May 29, 2003
    San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Its striking how few teams are making money. It's going to make the CBA negotiations that much harder.
     
    mjlee22 and SoccerIsOurLife repped this.
  22. mjlee22

    mjlee22 Quake & Landon fan

    Nov 24, 2003
    near Palo Alto, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    An Athletic article pointed out that SUM makes a lot of money for MLS owners and has a huge valuation. Plus all the special districts that the clubs have gotten with their new stadiums reaps in more money in tax benefits, retail & real estate income, etc. I hope the MLSPA has the smarts to understand and demand to know how all that works. MLS owners pleading poverty is modern mythology.
     
    Scott Rohde and Antonio2020 repped this.
  23. Antonio2020

    Antonio2020 Member

    Nov 28, 2016
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Yes, read that article as well m22. Excellent piece, insight.
     
    mjlee22 repped this.
  24. falvo

    falvo Member+

    Mar 27, 2005
    San Jose & Florence
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    Sooner or later, there will be no more expansion clubs. Not unless they break up into 3-4 leagues. I can't believe potential MLS owners will want small market clubs. For this area, the only 3 largest cities are San Jose, San Francisco and the Oakland East Bay Area. Oakland seems to be coming up with big plans although no one has really emerged yet. I can't imagine SF ever getting a stadium and that only leaves San Jose. I'm sure there would be a high demand for an owner unless the league and teams fold or start relocating. Of course it would all depend on Fisher wanting to sell.
     

Share This Page