The latest sedition of, Fox News actively makes you stupid

Fair enough.

 

It is of course perfectly appropriate for the Government to support and even subsidize worthy citizens of proper heritage who have been defrauded by the actions of the Rothschilds and their proxies.

The problem is money going to those others.There is no reason for them to be receiving anything.

/s

 

I think everybody who is not a Trump voter realizes that Fox is Republican propaganda, not news. Although some also convince themselves that Fox is not unique, that MSNBC or CNN or whatever is the left's Fox, and that is a very large stretch. But a different subject.

 

pic.twitter.com/1D4e2pi1d8

— John Whitehouse (@existentialfish) May 7, 2019

 

I'd take that billion of your hands, but since you never wash them, you can keep it, Brian...

Brian Kilmeade: "[Donald Trump] lost a lot of money over the course of 10 years, if you consider a billion dollars a lot of money." pic.twitter.com/2TXR1J6T1d

— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) May 8, 2019

 

I'll take that dirty money.

 

Double pun:

1. Are you going to launder it?

2. So did Trump.

 

I have a neighbor who watches Fox News every night. Loudly. I believe he's hard of hearing because you can hear his TV, outside, at least 50 feet away, I am excited that I'm potentially moving soon.

That said, if I was half as dumb and vapid as these people I'd make a fortune.

1126109786620276736 is not a valid tweet id

 

I would add that chyron thing is wrong.
The New York Times did not "release" 10 years of Trump's taxes.
They wrote an article discussing 10 years of Trump's taxes.

If there was a release of the actual taxes, I do not see it.

 

We lived next door to people like that. The TV itself wasn't that loud, but the woman would occasionally scream at her TV. Well, usually at the latest Obama abomination as depicted by Fox News. At least a couple nights a week between 9 and 11, we'd hear her.

 

I'm sure my neighbors complain about me screaming at the TV too. I had to live through the Daniel Woolard era at DC United.

 

Every night, 9-11, Fox News. Right next to my damn bedroom where his living room is. I have to hear the yelling.

At least said neighbor isn't watching porn anymore. First night that happened I walked to the bar.

 

Pretty much the same reaction, I suspect.

 

Maybe it was because why:

2/ #SpecialReport –– This undecipherable chyron stayed on screen throughout @johnrobertsFox's report on China trade war

'Mixed Reaction From To Policy'

Serious Question: Can @FoxNews producers read? 🤦‍♀️ pic.twitter.com/QDzv0pJvwa

— Bad Fox Graphics (@BadFoxGraphics) May 10, 2019

 

I wonder if they have autocorrect on their chyron machine. Ill bet it is supposed to say 'mixed reactions to farm policy'. It was installed originally to change 'R' to 'D'. on dead hooker stories.

 

Do we have to speal it out for them?

On Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends,' Ainsley Earhardt asks: "How did we get to this point? Why don't we trust the DOJ? Why don't we trust the FBI?" pic.twitter.com/F2FM4luQDe

— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) May 15, 2019

 

The latest edition of Fox News actively makes you support cold blooded murderers:

Brian Kilmeade says critics of Trump's plans to pardon war criminals "believe the wrong story" and "have not listened to [the war criminals'] side." Tomi Lahren adds that the outrage "just shows where their priorities are. It's always been terrorists over American warfighters." pic.twitter.com/nKQ7xlfqfl

— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) May 22, 2019

 

********ing libs want to believe service members and processes over individual service members.

 

Fox - "Democrats have always supported terrorists over American warfighters."

Libertarians - "We hate warmongering. We caucus with Repubicans because the Dems are no better."

Sure fellas. You go with that.

 

I presume you refer to politicians here. It's more like "hey, at least we can carve out an anti-war niche over here while avoiding a whole lot of other non FP-related garbage, and still reach out to the three or four serious anti-war Dems".

 

I wonder what Fox thinks of this guy.

https://taskandpurpose.com/krulak-statement-trump-warcrimes

"If President Trump follows through on reports that he will mark Memorial Day by pardoning individuals accused or convicted of war crimes, he will betray these ideals and undermine decades of precedent in American military justice that has contributed to making our country's fighting forces the envy of the world," said {Charles} Krulak, who served in the Marine Corps for more than three decades before retiring in 1999 as the 31st Commandant.

Krulak, a two-time Purple Heart recipient and son of legendary Lt. Gen. Victor "Brute" Krulak, went on to say that "disregard for the law undermines our national security," and it would negatively impact combat effectiveness, increase the risk to U.S. troops, and provide a propaganda boon to extremists.

The retired general's statement came in response to recent reporting over the weekend that Trump was considering the possibility of issuing pardons on Memorial Day to Navy SEAL Chief Edward Gallagherand Special Forces Maj. Matthew Golsteyn — both of which are currently undergoing court-martial proceedings on separate war crimes charges — as well as a group of Marine scout snipers who were accused of urinating on the bodies of Taliban corpses in 2011.
​

Fox also seems to be neglecting that the trials are not set in The Hague, but in American military tribunals.

 

Haven't checked lately, but I wonder similar about Maj. Danny Sjursen (ret?).

 

New Fox toxic cocktail called White Nazi with a sprinkle of Dinesh:

Hey, who wants to watch Laura Ingraham and Dinesh D'Souza react to Rush Limbaugh's comments about MLK? pic.twitter.com/R8rjuHvuhi

— Andrew Lawrence (@ndrew_lawrence) May 29, 2019