The whole party is a criminal enterprise: EXCLUSIVE: The former Ukrainian diplomat at the center of allegations that Kyiv meddled in the 2016 election has met Devin Nunes https://t.co/M3JVHmH7Io— The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast) November 5, 2019
But read the transcript Seriously these guys are so bad at crime BREAKING from the NY Times: US Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland updated his testimony to acknowledge delivering a quid-pro-quo message to Ukraine https://t.co/44jNkbMMBs— Michael Del Moro (@MikeDelMoro) November 5, 2019
So Sonderland has confessed to the exact same QPQ that Trump and Mick have confessed to I am sure Taibbi & Greenwald will soon explain why this is more hype brought to you by the people who tried to sell the Russia thing
It is called a "refresher" lol...... Sondland is not out of the woods yet though. By the end of the week, El Douche will be "I don't even know Sondland....He was supporting Jeb Bush.....He is a never trumper...."
Why do you people keep bringing up Sondland? I offered Denmark a beautiful deal for Sondland and they turned it down.
The Freedom Caucus will be telling us thats a nothingburger and the Never Trumpers got to him. What was yesterday ironclad exoneration might be dismissed completely tomorrow. After all, JAreds security clearance disclosures are said to have been 'updated' dozens of times.
“Do you stand by your confession?” https://t.co/wYmLyiyZJx— David Pepper (@DavidPepper) November 5, 2019
SONDLAND also indicated he spoke mlutiple times with PERRY in advance of his testimony, including even the day before, to "refresh my memory," though investigators questioned the appearance of coordinating stories. https://t.co/g9bkSdlarw— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) November 5, 2019
WOW: Kurt Volker TEXTED to a top Ukrainian official the script they wanted Zelensky to read to announce the Burisma (i.e. Biden)/2016 election investigaitons.The latest:https://t.co/g9bkSdlarwThe text: pic.twitter.com/GpQPSiBrDw— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) November 5, 2019
Pretzel Graham: Whoops. https://t.co/jIz6rBnKlh— Neal Katyal (@neal_katyal) November 5, 2019 If House D’s refuse to release full transcript of Volker testimony as requested by Congressman Jordan, it will be an abuse of power.— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) October 9, 2019 1191824848978358274 is not a valid tweet id
'Cockburn' isn't a person. It's a pseudonym. They're rather different, though. It's true that the Spectator is a right-wing publication that employs some polemicists, (and some complete idiots), but they also publish some serious journalists as well like James Forsyth and Isabel Hardman. Actually, the Daily (hate)-Mail is owned by Lord Rothermere of The Daily Mail and General Trust, (DMGT), not the Barclay Brothers like the spectator. Of course, if the criteria is simply that the publisher owns a publication or channel with which we disagree, strictly speaking that would mean we have to ignore everything in The Times because it's owned by Rupert Murdoch who also owns Faux News.
If he is given a nickname based on a snack food I figured "cracker" is more appropriate. Really? I thought it was the medical condition Little Lyin' Man had after shagging too many porn actresses....
When will GOP roll out this new defense -- POTUS could not have intended a quid pro quo because he doesn't know Latin.
Pretzel looks adequate: Sen. Lindsey Graham -- defending Trump -- now says the president and his aides "seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo," because their policy toward Ukraine was so "incoherent."— Steven Portnoy (@stevenportnoy) November 6, 2019
Because Trump getting his large adult son to tweet the name to assist his corruption is the same as randos on the internet right?
If @DonaldJTrumpJr has disclosed the correct name of the whistleblower, that person must file a lawsuit against him for his use of familial connections to undermine federal law with the intent of punishing those who abide by that law.— Kurt Eichenwald (@kurteichenwald) November 6, 2019
No it has not. Nothing is confirmed, and that is the way is should be. BTW, you should also take note of the posters here who have not really speculated on who it is, and we tend to speculate on "unnamed sources" quite often.
As a rumor it has been out for a couple of weeks. And he says alleged whistleblower on his tweet. So he is not confirming anything. Yeah it's pretty dirty even if he is still a "private citizen". But I've seen articles saying that he "outed the whistleblower" when he is just repeating those Breitart articles.
"....just repeating those Breitart articles" Where do you think Breitbart got the name from? Jesus wept.