Eso es lo que le venden a uno para que empiece la certificacion.... Pero es como el tute, tiene muchas reglas.... Necesita Cisco, pero tambien Microsoft y tambien A+, y entonces lo ponemos en esta y luego saca la cisco level II, entonces alla en el otro trabajo si empieza por 60k... Pero como yo soy empirico mas bien, me tocaria sacar al menos dos certificaciones mas y para empezar veia trabajos por el orden de 30-40k... al menos aca en Miami (que pagan poco y todo es caro, ya se!!!) Yo trabajo con el Condado, y aunque no gano mucho, tengo perspectivas y espero que me acepten en FIU para arrancar un master en el 2007 y hare el enfasis en IT, con lo que sere el supervisor del que mantiene la red Cisco ..... Todo esto quiere decir que me veran menos por aca y que tendre que ver y jugar menos futbol.....
si claro, yo pense que cuando te referias al trabajo en cisco hablabas ya de haber pasado lor 4 examenes (creo que son 4) bueno por aca en donde estudie el mcsa dan como 4 semestres de cisco para pasar 4 examenes. No se cuantos son con exactitud, yo se que para ser un MCSE hay que pasar el de MCSA, y otros 4 o 5. Siempre se demora. Pero en eso hay buena demanda. Y es mas facil que computer science, es que si no estuviera haciendo tantas cosas a la vez le gastaria el tiempo a sacar los certificados para mcse.
Mirando en retrospectiva, yo deberia haber estudiado programacion... Tengo mucha facilidad para eso... Pero estudie administracion y luego mercadeo y me desconecte del asunto.... Hace 3 años empece con lo de la programacion, me contaron lo de CISCO e intente un rato, pero como que no gusto la idea de volver a arrancar... De todos modos nunca es tarde para cambiar...
Es que programar en si es facil, lo maluco es que uno no puede ser solo programador, tiene que aprender todo sobre lo que va a programar y aparte tiene fechas para entragar trabajo y uno trabaja como mil horas a la semana en salario por muy poco dinero, por que todos los proyectos de programacion los mandan para la india donde son muy buenos programadores, hacen el doble por la mitad del dinero. Y aparte esa matematica moderna y mas matematica y matematica y matematica en computer science a lo ultimo harta. Yo pensaba que era programar programar... tan bacano... pero es matematica matematica matematica. despues del segundo anho no se ven si no numeros. ni numeros, sumatorias con miles de variables que te resultan en otra variable.
Entonces que es lo tuyo, hadexx, me refiero para donde vas? Que pinta el futuro, porque eso fue lo otro que vi, un amigo me puso en contacto con un man que esta haciendo la plata del mundo con equipos de networking... adivinen donde son hechos... obviamente no habia posibilidades.... Yo estoy en crossroads de mi vida, pero me gusta la tecnologia, aunque no me veo programando ni manteniendo redes... Vamos a ver que conexiones hago en mi Master (como lo nombro no?)
si hermano, eso se vuelve un acto de equilibrio ni el berraco, yo ahora porque no estoy trabajando en nada serio, por eso mantengo bastantico tiempo aca, claro que ahora ultimo me he pasado dias sin entrar......solo en los fines de semana.
por ejemplo: hablando de los que son gratis esta este de AOL "Active Virus Shield." http://www.download.com/AOL-Active-Virus-Shield/3000-2239_4-10568703.html?tag=lst-0-1 yo no lo he tratado, pero es un solucion para el que no tenga antivirus...... otro que es muy famoso y gratis, es AVG http://free.grisoft.com/doc/1 este me lo han recomendado varias personal.
Para donde voy???? ni idea!!!! Por ahora, tengo 3 proyectos, ya ustedes conocen nuestrofutbol.tv, el otro en el que estamos trabajando (estoy) es palostuyos.com que es como un iQuiero, y lo de los servidores shoutcast. Tambien tengo mi trabajo normal donde hago un poquito de todo, programo, networking, desktop support, etc, etc, etc. Y pues tambien estoy estudiando. No, se, hay tanto por aprender y tanto por lograr. Tambien tengo una plata en el stock market, ojala eso me de buen billete en el futuro.
me acorde de lo que estabamos hablando el otro dia, aca esta lo que dice un man sobre windows, networking, viruses, y resto... ----Microsoft has been with the technology market for quite sometime, successfully locking technologies, while trying to also successfully create a good, easy to use, compatible, reliable, and secure operating system. Microsoft has gotten to such a point as the years planning, production, and programming of 3.0, 3.1, 3.11, 95, 98, 98SE, ME, 2000 Pro, 2000 Server, XP Home, XP Professional, 2003 Server have gone by. Microsoft has failed. It's that simple. After a grueling week of working on a small business network of various versions of windows including 2000, 98, and XP, I'm tired of background viruses, I'm tired of hidden malware, I'm tired of worm/trojans and worm/malware... yes, I'm that tired of it. While Microsoft excels at easy compatibility with hardware and walk-in store software(atleast until Longhorn~'compatabilities problems commence!' ~but hey, it's Microsoft, we expect random odd things to go wrong with our computers now and then), Microsoft drops security out the window. Or, perhaps I should say out the Windows. It's not that it won't play the coolest games, and It's certainly not that you can't be productive on it, it's just that it does not make any sense to need a technician to increase you're security on the installation of an operating system! That's crazy... but that's microsoft. Technicians should be spending their time making things work, such as hardware with the operating system, or network issues. Instead, we're all fighting a malware war and finally giving up and making our own primary home operating systems BSD(Unix-NetBSD,FreeBSD,OpenBSD) or Linux(SuSE,Slackware,Red Hat,Knoppix) while not telling our customers. Our customers don't know what it's like to use a system that doesn't get viruses on a user level, and we all have receding hairlines because of it. However, if you insist on using Windows, buy Windows XP 'Pocket Reference' from O'Reilly and get out you're install disks. Reformat that drive right away and re-install Windows all the while making sure your LAN cables and modem cables are fully unplugged from you're computer. Then, open you're book to pages 175 to 181, and read thoroughly. Do everything it tells you verbatim. Make sure you have less than 10 doors open(also known as ports). After doing all that, and checking your ports, and fixing the various issues, connect to the internet, and proceed to download the 17 billion gigs of 'security' updates over a course of a possible 4 or 5 reboots. Now, if you did all that, you finally have a tolerable operating system. Sure, it'll still get viruses, but at least everybody and their dog won't know all the information in your computer through on a few thousand doors on your computer because of the 23 trojans that Internet Explorer picked up in 5 hours of surfing the web. Using Mozilla Firefox 1.04 and Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 instead of Internet Explorer and a Microsoft Email client on a daily level will lessen your security risk by mountains. Avoiding using Yahoo Chat and MSN Chat will also. Try Gaim... it's still compromisable, sure, but since it's multi-protocol, if you drop it, you can kill all chat processes. If you go Mac.. you're going Unix whether you realize it or not, and if you keep you're current hardware, you can go AllLinuxCD.com and pick a BSD for 4 bucks. Before you do that, feel free to buy Knoppix Hacks by O'Reilly, and use the bootable CD in the back of the book to work in Knoppix daily without altering you're current system. Then, when you're comfortable with it, know that Linux and UNIX have a lot of similarities, so whether you go BSD or Linux, you'll see much of the same things you'll see in you're Knoppix CD. I do hope this review was helpful to some of you. It's not that I don't like compatability... it's the hassle that windows has caused me over the years... or that malware has, I suppose. Good Luck to you all.------------
a mi me paso lo mismo que un aparato que ya no uso, cuando un genio de cuñado que dio una version de windows XP, para mejorar mi sistema...... quede en fuera de lugar.....el pregunto mucho a sus amigos techies y parece ser que esas maquinas viejas solo estan para windows 98... sera verdad pibe o hardezzx?
Windows XP necesita bastantes recursos, a computadores "diseñados" para las versiones de antes les queda muy pesado Windows XP. Microsoft llego a decir que la mayoria de computadores iban a poder con Windows XP, pero a medida que la gente lo empezo a usar, se dieron cuenta que no era asi.......¿cuanto RAM tenia el computedor viejo? el minimo recomendo son 512 MB, para que el computador funcione sin problema, claro que se puede poner a funcionar con computadores que tenga menos RAM, pero lo recomendo es 512MB....... aqui esta la otra perla de Microsoft, para Windows Vista, el minimo de RAM recomendado es 1GB, para poder usar todo el "eye candy" del sistema.......en computadores de menos, funciona Vista, pero sin todos los efectos visuales que tiene Vista (al cual llaman "aero glass"). Eso es otra cosa, ahora estan vendiendo computadores "Windows Vista Capable" <---- esos son los que van a poder funcionar con Vista, pero sin todos los efectos visuales, para que los efectos visuales funcionen, se necesita un computador que diga "Windows Vista Premium."
yo siempre he tenido como regla en mi vida respetar gente no por la plata que tienen sino por el conocimiento que adquieren.......................y uds se ganaron TODO mi respeto! tengo un consejo para dapip: metale ganas a su sueño HOY no espere que llege el master, se lo digo pues a mi me dejo el bus en una decision muy parecida, no me gustaria que le pase a nadie que tenga las ganas de salir adelante comu uds 3. La palabra clave fue eso que dijiste 'estoy en el cross road de mi vida', ademas estas casado y llegan lo ninos y se jode uno en lo personal y hay que trabajar para ellos y su bienestar. pibe...a tu pregunta anterior: no se cuanto ram tenia ese aparato...buscare. ciao, me voy de mi (que pena: dije My) buen trabajo de 9 to 5!!!!!!!! you know what I mean?
gracias por la palabras, mijo [paisa]¡vos sos todo un personaje![/paisa] "ciao, me voy de my buen trabajo de 9 to 5!!!!!!!!" oiga hermano, un dia de estos nos tenemos que chupar una agrias entre todos....y como nos toca atravesarnos el pais, eso seria algo asi como "Euro Trip" pero Colombian style.
miren aqui esta explicado por el mismo microsoft: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/capable.mspx asi que si van a comprar computadores ahora, miren que sean "Windows Vista Premium" por le menos yo pienso seguir con mi computador con Windows XP por ahora, talvez en un futuro me toque comprar uno, pero entonce lo compraria con Vista incluido.
Saben que es bien triste!!!! (o se escribe trizte?) que digamos yo tengo un computador con un pentium D 920, y es de 64 Bits dual core. Pero... windows xp es un sistema de 32 bits, osea, mi computadora aunque es muy rapida, pudiera estar trabajando al doble de velocidad. Lo mas triste, es que existe un version de windows de 64 bis. Windows 64x creo que se llama, la borre hace como 6 meses. NO tiene absolutmente nada tampoco que funcione en 64 bits. Osea, el sistema operativo es de 64 bits, pero las aplicaciones casi todas van en 32 bits. El windows 64x depronto por ahi tiene un internet explorer de 64bit, y ... y ya.... por ahi salio en windows media encoder para 64 bit, y para instalar la tarjeta de video fue un super gayo conseguir unos drivers que sirvieran. En si, es mas el lio tener windows 64x que es un Elefante Blanco. Por que les menciono esto, segun creo!!! el windows vista es un sistema operativo de 64 bits, asi que si el computador no tiene un procesador de 64 bits... demalas, y aparte necesita ram que da miedo. Osea, mi computador que funciona de maravilla, le meti mucha plata, si le pongo windows vista, aduras penas funciona bien, necesito MAS. (WTF????) pero si le instalo Linux SUSE 10 (version 64 bits) funciona muchisimo mejor y seguro va a ser mas estable y las aplicaciones funcionan en 64 bits, y utilizo todo el potencial de mi computador, algo que windows xp no es capas de hacer.
yo estuve tentado a conseguirme un computador de 64bits con XP de 64, pero me desanime' por eso mismo, porque las aplicaciones (programas) todavia son 32 bits....... por ahora sigo con el que tengo.......
Efer, no estoy esperando sentado en mis laureles, ya meti todos los papeles, es mas la semana pasada me la pase en carreras mandando lo que me faltaba por correo certificado. La decision la deben dar a final de mes y de ser favorable empiezo en el Spring term de 2007..... Ahora yo te devuelvo el consejo: Que no se haya podido dar en un momento pasado, no significa que no puedas volver a intentarlo. Yo se que con hijos y con mas responsabilidades sacar el tiempo es mas dificil, pero igual se puede, requiere mas esfuerzo, de pronto te demoras mas, pero el estudio (como decia mi mama) es lo unico que le queda a uno en la vida... Y.... esa es otra de las razones que no me movi a otro campo, 8 to 5, Monday to Friday es muy comodo, muy conveniente poder hacer cosas en el fin de semana...
para los que esten interesados, hay una revista virtual gratis, bueno al final de este año empiezan a cobrar subscripción, que se llama TUX, es mas que todo escrita para los nuevos usuarios de Linux....dan consejos y trucos para hacer diferentes cosas con Linux, y "enseñan" como volver una computadora con Linux en una maquina para grabar TV digital, como "manejar" (administrar) la musica, las fotos, como hacer para usar los juegos de Windows en Linux.....en fin......resonden muchas preguntas que les mandan y ayudan a mejorar la "experiencia" del usuario cuando usa Linux por primera vez.... las ediciones virtuales se pueden bajar hasta Diciembre me parece, despues toca pagar. www.tuxmagazine.com edit: parece que ya estan cobrando, si quieren las ediciones diganmen yo se las mando por e-mail. (son en .pdf asi que no deber de haber ningun problema)
para los que tengan Windows XP Home, Windows XP Home: obsolete sooner than you expect 1/3/2006 9:08:13 PM, by Ken Fisher Microsoft set out to adopt a formal and rigid support lifecycle in 2002, back at a time when most analysts were expecting to see Windows Vista (then, "Longhorn") within a couple of years. My own point of view was that this lifecycle business had a lot to do with Microsoft's then-new volume licensing scheme, which among other things is oriented towards selling software subscriptions. If you're buying a subscription for software, you can see how lifecycle plans become important. However, delays in Windows Vista coupled with a questionable approach to "consumer" products means that 2007 will carry a few surprises unless policy changes are made at Redmond. XP Professional and Home are divided into two general product categories for Microsoft, namely business and consumer products. XP Professional, as a business product, will receive mainstream support for two additional years after the release of Windows Vista (whenever that may be). After that, Professional will have an additional five years of extended service (minimum), though this could be lengthened considerably if the OS update after Windows Vista does not ship within three years of Vista's debut. Mainstream and Extended support are virtually identical, with both carrying security updates, service packs, online support, and the availability of paid support. However, the transition to the Extended Support phase means that hotfixes that are not security related will be made available by a (paid) commercial contract, warranty claims can no longer be made, and Microsoft will not entertain adding any new features or design elements to the OS. Based on the current timeline and our own expectations for the launch of Windows Vista, we estimate Windows XP Professional Mainstream Support ending in late December 2008, with Extended Support ending in December of 2013. It could stretch out longer, but we don't expect the window to be more than two to three additional years. After the Extended Support phase is finished, online support (knowledge base, FAQ, etc.) will continue for 10 years. Windows XP Home coming up short Windows XP Home is another story. As a consumer product, it suffers from two policy deficiencies. First, consumer products do not qualify for Extended Support, but instead move directly into the online support phase after Mainstream Support ends. Second, whereas business products are guaranteed Mainstream Support for two years beyond the release of the next subsequent version of a product (in this case, Windows Vista), consumer products do not get this built-in transitional period. The end result is that Windows XP Home will leave Mainstream Support and enter online support on January 1, 2007—in less than a year. When that day comes, XP Home users may feel left out in the cold, because they will no longer qualify for security updates, and will not be able to purchase support from Microsoft. Finding this situation somewhat alarming, I contacted Microsoft's representation to clarify the matter. A Microsoft spokesman relayed the following to me: "For consumer products, security updates will be available through the end of the mainstream phase. For Windows XP Home Edition, there will be no security updates after 12/31/06." Regarding paid support for problems unrelated to security patches, I was told that "Users who want to continue to receive support after the Microsoft assisted and paid support offerings have ended may visit the Retired Product Support Options Web site." I urge Microsoft to reconsider this stance. There should be considerably more overlap in support for their consumer OS. While five years of support for XP Home may have seemed reasonable when it was expected that there would be little more than three years between major OS updates, the time it has taken to bake Windows Vista has thrown this out entirely. If Vista launches in October, it would give users a mere two months to move to the OS, or risk being unsupported. I suspect that Microsoft will grant a stay of execution for Windows XP Home, because the alternative is to create a PR nightmare that would also leave customers fuming. Citing emerging markets in the past, Microsoft extended support for Windows 98 and ME by more than two years, and this decision was made long after Windows XP was released. Microsoft should extend support for Windows XP Home well into 2008. Otherwise users will have to hope that updates to XP Professional meet their needs, but it remains unclear if Windows Update will point XP Home users to updates to XP Professional. actualizacion: Microsoft quietly extends XP Home support 1/12/2006 6:24:07 PM, by Ken "Caesar" Fisher Earlier this month I reported that Windows XP Home would be leaving Mainstream Support at the end of this year, and I called on Microsoft to extend XP Home support in a similar fashion to the support already enjoyed by Windows XP Professional. Surprised that the support date had not yet been extended, I contacted Microsoft and was told that support would in fact end at the end of this year. Perhaps the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing, because in a little over a week, things have changed. The good news is that Microsoft appears to be making an exception to the way it normally treats "consumer products," and has explicitly extended Windows XP Home support to "two years after the next version of this product is released," that is, two years after the release of Windows Vista. Microsoft has also extended the Mainstream Support lifespan of other products that were on borrowed time, including Media Center Editions 2002, 2004, and 2005, and XP Tablet edition. They will all also get the two year extension, which by our estimates means that they will receive support until the end of 2008. Windows XP Professional will see support well beyond 2011. So-called "consumer" products typically only receive five years of mainstream support, and after this period, they are no longer patched and paid support is not offered (online materials will still be available). Business software, on the other hand, gets five years of Mainstream Support, followed by an additional five years of Extended Support, which prolongs security updates and the potential for paid support. As I noted in my original coverage, this gap problem for XP Home arose because of the extra long time it has taken to bring Windows Vista out from the shadows. Established around the time when the company was heavily promoting business software subscriptions, the original thinking behind the support schedule seems to have been oriented towards creating a support lifecycle that moved along with the company's products. At the same time, the company wanted to account for the significant amount of lag between their own OS releases, and uptake in the business sector (remember, this was to ease concerns about subscriptions). Hence, business products have an additional provision that guarantees Mainstream Support for any given business product for two additional years beyond the release of a subsequent product, or five years (whichever is later). After this, Extended Support kicks in, which also has provisions for subsequent releases. Will Microsoft adopt this "next release + two years" support approach for consumer operating systems from here out? The company did not say, but if they will guarantee a minimum of five years of support with the potential for additional years based on subsequent releases, it would be an improvement over the current scheme, which is "wait and see what we announce, when we announce it." This brings me to a confusing aspect of this story. News.com today is running with this story as a "False alarm over Windows support deadline," and Ines Vargas, a program manager at Microsoft, is claiming that this was all a misunderstanding stemming from the company's website. The News.com story doesn't mention my report, which was the only report to investigate the issue, but goes on to explain that in Microsoft's eyes, they're just now bringing the website inline with their own internal thinking on support. "This was brought to our attention late last week, and since then, we have worked diligently to make the change on the site, which was effective Tuesday night," she said. "It was not a change in support policy. It is reflective of the policy as we understand it." I find this strange, because I contacted Microsoft's representatives not once but twice on this issue, and they confirmed the support cutoff date that I originally reported (12/31/2006). While I am pleased that this particular issue has been clarified, it's not entirely clear to me that this wasn't, in fact, a change in support policy. The matter may be largely inconsequential, but I feel that it is necessary to point out that my original report was written in consultation with Microsoft spokespeople, and I even asked explicitly about support cut-off dates for XP Home. You can take that for what it's worth, but I want the record to be clear. -------------------------
Pibe, tengo la pregunta del millon, bueno son como 10 preguntas. Mira, me sucede esto. Quiero permitir connecciones VPN a un servidor en mi casa. y mi setup es el siguiente. Internet Modem (IP estatico)-------Firewall (CheckPoint)---- Router (linksys)--- Switch----Servidor Osea, la red funciona bien, se connecta al itnernet, el servidor bien, etc. En el firewall puse la info del internet (IP, Subnet, gateway, DNS 1, DNS 2) pero yo de Firewalls no se nada. Yo quiero estar en otro lado, y hacer un vpn al servidor. Tengo que hacer algun port foward en el router? tengo que crear algunos settings en el firewall? Dame un overall con el setup que tengo a ver si me guias en el camino correcto para hacer esto. Muchas gracias.
Creo que ya encontre el problema, creo que tengo que agregar el servidor con mac adress, ip al firewall para poderlo ver desde afuera, pues una de las computadores que tengo agregada al firewall le puedo hacer el ping desde afuera y me responde. Voy a hacer lo mismo con el servidor manhana y supongo que eso me solucionara el problema.
Desde que le haga Port Forwarding la "pared de fuego" no deberia interceder.........hace tiempo me enseñaron como hacer esto, voy a buscar las notas de ese entoces. ¿Que OS tiene el servidor? si es W2k3 mirece esta pagina: http://www.onecomputerguy.com/networking/w3k_vpn_server.htm mas o menos asi lo hicimos nosotros Port Forwarding al IP statica del servidor, Port 1723, l Permitir PPTP protocol en el router. (todo es mas o menos lo que dice en esa pagina, pero ud ya tienen el setup del servidor hecho, lo unico que necesita es el setup del router)
Desde adentro puedo conectarme via VPN sin problema, el problema es el firewall y el router y en router ya tengo el port foward hecho. le agregue el mac y ip del servidor pero parece no haber funcionado. voy a tener que volverlo a hacer a ver que.
¿Que error le sale? siempre casi da un numero. otro enredo que se presenta mucho es el del DHCP server, ¿ud tiene uno? eso asigna los IPs a los clientes (el que se conecte) una manera si uno no lo tiene, es asignando un "static ip pool" para los que se conecten. wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Host_Configuration_Protocol