Stadium Wants/Needs/Must Haves

Discussion in 'Columbus Crew' started by catfish9, Oct 30, 2018.

  1. soccerncbus

    soccerncbus Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Mar 29, 2018
    Tobias C, TRUJDUB, HectorM and 4 others repped this.
  2. DrunkandDisorderly

    Mar 17, 2008
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
  3. Minnman

    Minnman Member+

    Feb 11, 2000
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Two items:

    So the land transfer still hasn't happened, And,

    Stadium porn in September, then.
     
  4. POdinCowtown

    POdinCowtown Member+

    Jan 15, 2002
    Columbus
    Seems like we're not much further now than we were a couple months ago.
     
  5. Minnman

    Minnman Member+

    Feb 11, 2000
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I mean, who knows? NRI and new ownership have been playing nice for a very long time, I seems, yet there's no land transfer yet. Arace stated that the sales price was agreed to very early in the process, so that's not the issue.

    On the other hand...

    If NRI is allowing access to the site; if some basic site prep has already happened (as Bez noted earlier this summer); if buildings are going be knocked down; if actual "moving dirt" project construction is supposed to begin next month; and if ownership is planning on a Short North storefront for fans that provides an opportunity to preview what the stadium will look like, well, maybe a lot has been happening, we just don't know the details.

    What I do know - based on what people have said in reporting about it - is that the timeline for this project is very, very short compared to what normally would be the case. The fact that, from all reports, we've maintained the same timeline that was referenced in February is very good news.
     
    Tobias C, LaMacchia and TrueCrew repped this.
  6. speedye1

    speedye1 Member+

    Dec 31, 2002
    Talked a bit with his son today and they haven't gotten into specifics and I wouldn't know pricing. They may head down to the previously mentioned downtown showcase once open and decide from there.
     
    hardhead and crewfan_in_columbus repped this.
  7. DAK77

    DAK77 Member+

    Nov 10, 2008
    Merion Village, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I heard on the news this morning that the feel of what they are building will match with the rest of what the Arena District looks like. I hope this means the stadium isn't as boring as what Nationwide Area looks like. It would be a shame if the new Crew Stadium was not able to stand out. I know @GoCrew1996 said this was something being discussed so I hope the Crew didn't cave to NRI.
     
  8. TrueCrew

    TrueCrew Member+

    Dec 22, 2003
    Columbus, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    That would indicate the exact opposite. Cave. Barf.
     
    Minnman repped this.
  9. MelbaToast

    MelbaToast Member+

    Jun 20, 2014
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    I'd take the Arena District aesthetic over what they just proposed for Franklinton. Good grief. Does good taste even exist anymore?
     
    TheUltra repped this.
  10. TrueCrew

    TrueCrew Member+

    Dec 22, 2003
    Columbus, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Just to be clear, I am talking about the stadium itself. The surrounding stuff, I could care less.

    As for Franklinton, the apartments on Town/Rich off McDowell are quite nice (and would fit within the Arena aesthetic). The stuff on Broad, not so much.
     
  11. TheUltra

    TheUltra Member

    Mar 23, 2008
    2.4 Miles from home
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I disagree with ya here. I actually LOVE the look of NWA and while I don't want the new stadium to be boring I want it to look like a classic ball park. I'd love to see something that has a timeless look about it and not just some spaceship that set down in the Arena district.
     
  12. stanger

    stanger BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 29, 2008
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Agree.

    While the brick facades in the Arena District might be a touch boring, they certainly aren't going to look out of place in 20 years.

    The classic look is always classic. Think Camden Yards.
     
  13. KCbus

    KCbus Moderator
    Staff Member

    United States
    Nov 26, 2000
    Reynoldsburg, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I care a lot less about what the stadium will look like on the outside than I do about what it will look like inside.
     
    the_rickler and TRUJDUB repped this.
  14. hungariansteven

    hungariansteven Member+

    May 29, 2012
    Columbus, Ohio
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    One of the things I would like to see inside our new stadium is a scoreboard where we have higher numbers next to our name than our opponent's.
     
    ohiotiger, FootyRef, Robbiegoal and 13 others repped this.
  15. Paul171121

    Paul171121 Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Dec 14, 2018
    I would not worry too much about deadlines or stuff like that; they are meant to be broken.
    I heard bids on certain things are already being prepared for the stadium.
    One thing about that area tho is the market value of that property and franklinton has now gone up you would think. Heck businesses have now moved into the old substation on that plot of land. I wonder if that might be the hold up on the mixed use property.

    For the stadium design: I'm fine with brick but wish there were some arch designs in there. As long as there are no shipping containers (progressive field), it should look nice.
     
    TheUltra and Tobias C repped this.
  16. BigStern

    BigStern Member

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Oct 2, 2018
    Columbus by way of Lima
    The Haslams are paying architects a lot of money to get creative and restrictions such as meeting NRI facade requirements are where they earn their money. Plus a brick facade should be cheaper than any modern or futuristic options which leaves more money for making the inside state of the art, which is the other spot where architects earn their exorbitant fees.

    I think we're going to get a building that looks like NWA but has a bit more flourishes to make it stand out. Think more glass and exposed structural members (where I think arches will be invoked). The fact that it's going to be an open air structure, gives them more freedom than was ever available with NWA.
     
  17. MelbaToast

    MelbaToast Member+

    Jun 20, 2014
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    I'm admittedly bias toward pre-war architecture and dislike 95% of anything built since 1950. I also dislike the Fallout-chic thing (sheet metal, rusted siding, etc.) that some people like to throw in as a quirk to uninspired design. There are many things that can be done to make a building enjoyable and yet people seem enamored with not doing that.
     
    MLSinCleveland repped this.
  18. DGA57v2

    DGA57v2 Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Apr 1, 2019
    Kind of like Cincinnati's?
     
    catfish9 and hungariansteven repped this.
  19. the_rickler

    the_rickler Member+

    Feb 9, 2013
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    I’m really going to miss Mapfre. I know 70% of the time the weather sucks, things are broken, and there isn’t any “modern” amenities, but there is nothing better than a 75 or 80 degree evening under the lights watching a game there.
     
    crew2112, catfish9, TKyle and 2 others repped this.
  20. Alneri

    Alneri Member

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Aug 3, 2018
    I have a feeling a 75-80 degree evening under the lights watching a game in the new stadium will be exponentially better.
     
    TRUJDUB repped this.
  21. speedye1

    speedye1 Member+

    Dec 31, 2002
    I take the longer view. I want to see so many banners with years on them that they circle the whole f'ing place.
     
    TRUJDUB, TheUltra and hungariansteven repped this.
  22. hungariansteven

    hungariansteven Member+

    May 29, 2012
    Columbus, Ohio
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    YES SIR!

    I think?
     
  23. hungariansteven

    hungariansteven Member+

    May 29, 2012
    Columbus, Ohio
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    That would be ideal. Lots of Carolina Cups to win
     
  24. Tobias C

    Tobias C Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Mar 6, 2014
    Toledo, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #1425 Tobias C, Aug 29, 2019
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2019
    This is what I'm thinking and hoping. Im for keeping it cohesive with the Arena District style but I think theres definitely opportunity to have unique "flourishes" as you put it. I'm a big proponent of arches somewhere in the design of the stadium. Something specifically relevant to Columbus, that can set our stadium apart from others, past, present, and future.

    I tend to like a lot of the spaceship-ey facade modern stadiums with their light displays and what not. I think they look cool. I also could see myself and the rest of the world changing our minds 10 years from now and it looking horrendously outdated. Red brick hasnt gone out of style yet, a century later.

    I do wonder if it would be possible, though probably not probable (somebody with some degree of architecture/style/design sense feel free to criticize) to have the sides of the stadium facing the streetfront all be the primary Arena District type of look, but then maybe have something radically different on the backside facing 670 to get noticed by the general public? Maybe the whole backside could be more transparent/translucent and have interesting/fun lighting? Just an idea!
     
    TKyle repped this.

Share This Page