Should Mexico and Costa Rica become permanent participants of Copa America?

Discussion in 'CONCACAF' started by La Trucha, Jun 18, 2015.

?

Should Mexico and Costa Rica become permanent participants of Copa America?

  1. Yes

    6 vote(s)
    33.3%
  2. No

    12 vote(s)
    66.7%
  1. La Trucha

    La Trucha Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 16, 2009
    42 Wallaby Way, Sydney
    Club:
    Melbourne Victory
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Instead of waiting to be invited by CONMEBOL to participate in the Copa America, do you think they should automatically participate? Mexico and Costa Rica both play quality football, but they play in a federation where 90% of their opponents are not up to their standards. Playing in the Copa America would only benefit Mexican and Costa Rican football since they would then play against South American opponents at their level, if not more or less.

    I trust some of you would have watched the recent electrifying match between Mexico and Chile where they both scored 3 goals each?
     
    It's called FOOTBALL repped this.
  2. AMLO2018

    AMLO2018 Member+

    Mexico
    Jul 12, 2012
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Switch up depending on who is the best team of CONCACAF & who is the 2nd after their World Cup rankings
     
    Footsatt repped this.
  3. La Trucha

    La Trucha Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 16, 2009
    42 Wallaby Way, Sydney
    Club:
    Melbourne Victory
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Mexico and Costa Rica have always been the best Latin American countries outside of South America, but playing against weak Caribbean and Central American sides (besides Honduras) won't help them develop as much as they should and that's not fair. They'd only get even better by playing against other teams who can actually go toe to toe with them.

    I'm reluctant to include Honduras, seeing as they're not as good as Mexico or Costa Rica, and I wouldn't include USA since they're not a Latin American country.
     
    It's called FOOTBALL repped this.
  4. EvanJ

    EvanJ Member+

    Manchester United
    United States
    Mar 30, 2004
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The tournament is called the Copa America, not the Copa Latin America.
     
  5. ussoccer97531

    ussoccer97531 Member+

    Oct 12, 2012
    Club:
    --other--
    No one in CONCACAF has enough depth to realistically compete in a strong Copa America with their second team.

    I'd like to see CONCACAF and CONMEBOL combined anyway. The travel wouldn't be that bad, and it'd be better for the top CONCACAF teams. If USA and Mexico can't qualify for the WC with 9-10 spots up for grabs, they don't deserve to play in the WC.
     
  6. jared9999

    jared9999 Member+

    Jan 3, 2005
    Naucalpan Estado de Mex
    Club:
    Club América
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Would love to see mls teams in libertadores :x3:

    Oh wait this aint the rivalry thread....my bad
     
  7. La Trucha

    La Trucha Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 16, 2009
    42 Wallaby Way, Sydney
    Club:
    Melbourne Victory
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    ...................
     
  8. Yañez

    Yañez Member+

    Oct 11, 2005
    Santiago, Llolleo
    Club:
    Univ de Chile
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    If they bring their A team then Mexico should compete, even the USA.
    Two worst teams this Copa America, surprise, from Concacaf.
     
  9. La Trucha

    La Trucha Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 16, 2009
    42 Wallaby Way, Sydney
    Club:
    Melbourne Victory
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Not even going to defend Jamaica, I don't even know why CONMEBOL thought they'd be strong competitors.
    I had no expectation of Jamaica making it far in this competition.

    As for Mexico, did you watch any of their games? They may have been eliminated, but they didn't go down without a fight, especially against their strongest opponent Chile.
     
    It's called FOOTBALL repped this.
  10. Rickdog

    Rickdog Member+

    Jun 16, 2010
    Santiago, Chile
    Club:
    CD Colo Colo
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    That's right.

    That is how we in CONMEBOL, named it.
    ;)
     
  11. jared9999

    jared9999 Member+

    Jan 3, 2005
    Naucalpan Estado de Mex
    Club:
    Club América
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Well the ticos with their olympic team beat bolivia last copa :p
     
  12. jared9999

    jared9999 Member+

    Jan 3, 2005
    Naucalpan Estado de Mex
    Club:
    Club América
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    9-10?

    It would be max 8. Concacafs 3.5 and conmebols 4.5
     
  13. Yañez

    Yañez Member+

    Oct 11, 2005
    Santiago, Llolleo
    Club:
    Univ de Chile
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    1 win doesnt mean anything. Every country in Concacaf would eventually get a victory against conmebol.
     
  14. Yañez

    Yañez Member+

    Oct 11, 2005
    Santiago, Llolleo
    Club:
    Univ de Chile
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    They were in our group, of course I saw their games. Jamaica didn´t go down without a fight either, did you see their games? But in the end, they were the first ones out, followed by Jamaica.
     
  15. jared9999

    jared9999 Member+

    Jan 3, 2005
    Naucalpan Estado de Mex
    Club:
    Club América
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    If a u-22 team beat mexico's A team other than the big 2 in CA......mejor me dedico al basketbol!
     
  16. Yañez

    Yañez Member+

    Oct 11, 2005
    Santiago, Llolleo
    Club:
    Univ de Chile
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    If they play 10 games, chances are this U-22 team would get at least 1 victory.
     
  17. jared9999

    jared9999 Member+

    Jan 3, 2005
    Naucalpan Estado de Mex
    Club:
    Club América
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    I'd say mexico wins all 10
     
    It's called FOOTBALL repped this.
  18. Yañez

    Yañez Member+

    Oct 11, 2005
    Santiago, Llolleo
    Club:
    Univ de Chile
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    in concacaf
     
  19. Catracho_Azul

    Catracho_Azul Member+

    Jun 16, 2008
    New Orleans
    Club:
    Corinthians Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Honduras
    Your daily reminder that unlike CR, Honduras placed 3rd in Copa America 01 on short notice eliminating Ronaldos Brazil in Quarters in route to Semis where we lost to hosts Colombia. #history
     
    ZeekLTK repped this.
  20. MK3owner

    MK3owner Member

    Jul 26, 2010
    Kissimmee FL.
    Club:
    Deportivo Toluca FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Mexico is basically a permanent participant, CONMEBOL wouldn't dare to not invite us(Mexico), and the money that comes along. As for the the other participants, I guess Costa Rica is a good choice. Honestly, it's pretty Mickey Mouse to invite a different country every edition.
     
  21. EvanJ

    EvanJ Member+

    Manchester United
    United States
    Mar 30, 2004
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Why? The Gold Cup, Euro, etc. don't have all the same teams every time.
     
  22. MK3owner

    MK3owner Member

    Jul 26, 2010
    Kissimmee FL.
    Club:
    Deportivo Toluca FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    The Gold cup is Mickey Mouse as it gets, with its rigged grouping, and never changing host.Last time I checked the Euro doesn't invite different teams every edition.
     
  23. ZeekLTK

    ZeekLTK Member

    Mar 5, 2004
    Michigan
    Nat'l Team:
    Norway
    Last I checked, NO ONE invites teams except Copa America. Every other tournament requires teams to actually play and qualify for it!
     
  24. Preston North End

    Feb 17, 2000
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    You can thank the CONCACAF/Traffic Sports marriage for why the Gold Cup is played in the U.S. every year (hasn't always been, but currently is).

    I doubt the USSF says no to whatever money/benefit it gets out of the deal.
     
  25. Yañez

    Yañez Member+

    Oct 11, 2005
    Santiago, Llolleo
    Club:
    Univ de Chile
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    I would love for Mexico AND the USA to be permament members of Copa Ameroca, but with their A team and only that.
     

Share This Page