News: Club World Cup to Expand; Confederations Cup to End

Discussion in 'FIFA and Tournaments' started by Nico Limmat, Sep 9, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HomietheClown

    HomietheClown Member+

    Dusselheim FC 1971
    Sep 4, 2010
    Club:
    --other--
    IT may not be a new comperition but it is a new Format during a totally different part of the calendar year.
    It is also being run in a different fashion because of the way it is structured with foreign investors.
    So based on those factors having some historically good teams from generations past that have won trophies (and have huge fan bases) is not really all that bad for the very first tournament like this.
     
  2. Nico Limmat

    Nico Limmat Member+

    Oct 24, 1999
    Dubai, UAE
    Club:
    Grasshopper Club Zürich
    Nat'l Team:
    Switzerland
    I will disagree as politely as I can.

    It's a ******* terrible idea.
     
  3. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    The first edition is pretty important. If this tournament isn't seen as one that declares a world champion, then its potential isn't great.

    Yeah, but its not a step-up from the ICC.

    Big Boys? You get that by inviting the CL finalists and winners, no? That's why the idea is so stupid. Hopefully it won't come to pass, although that article made it sound like this it is a bit beyond the consideration stage.
     
  4. HomietheClown

    HomietheClown Member+

    Dusselheim FC 1971
    Sep 4, 2010
    Club:
    --other--
    When this tournament occurs millions of people will watch and the big name teams will make it more likely more people watch.

    Call it a terrible idea or illegitimate or Donald Duck all you want.

    The point is they want to make it an event and a spectacle and creating a buzz is necessary.

    The December editions in Japan and the Middle East were stale yearly events nobody really cared about so they have devised a new strategy with a good business model in my mind.
     
  5. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    Yeah, we're not debating 8-team versus 24-team formats. We've already accepted that 12 UEFA teams will be there. This isn't about the reasons for having Man Utd instead of Melbourne Victory. Its about having one big UEFA teams instead of another big UEFA team. Why even bother?
     
    AlbertCamus repped this.
  6. ceezmad

    ceezmad Member+

    Mar 4, 2010
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Red Stars
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Is like you do not even know FIFA.
     
    locoxriver repped this.
  7. EvanJ

    EvanJ Member+

    Manchester United
    United States
    Mar 30, 2004
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The 2014-2015 through 2017-2018 Finals have had Barcelona, Real Madrid, Atletico Madrid, Juventus, and Liverpool. Adding in the seven clubs with the next best coefficients would give Bayern Munich, Sevilla, Paris Saint-Germain, Manchester City, Arsenal, Borussia Dortmund, and Porto. The two clubs tied for the best coefficient out would be Manchester United and Chelsea.
     
  8. Blastow

    Blastow Member

    Mar 19, 2010
    Kyiv, Ukraine
    Club:
    FC Dynamo Kyiv
    Nat'l Team:
    Ukraine
    If they plan to organize a test tournament, then it could be organized in 2019.. And already from 2021 to play a normal tournament on a sporting principle every 4 years.
     
  9. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    A 2019 test tournament would conflict with Copa America. Unless they wait until mid-July to begin the tournament, giving certain players no summer vacation at all.
     
  10. Nico Limmat

    Nico Limmat Member+

    Oct 24, 1999
    Dubai, UAE
    Club:
    Grasshopper Club Zürich
    Nat'l Team:
    Switzerland
  11. EvanJ

    EvanJ Member+

    Manchester United
    United States
    Mar 30, 2004
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  12. Blondo

    Blondo Member+

    Sep 21, 2013
    Seeing PSG president Nasser Al-Khelaifi is among the PFSC representatives while the Saudi-backed investment group are the ones who aim to secure rights to the new CWC is it safe to assume the Qatar–Saudi Arabia feud has a role in all of this?

    Real Madrid and Barca (after cutting ties with Qatar Airways and the €222m Neymar ordeal) have warmed to the proposal but according to Ceferin "at least three of the seven clubs" donot agree. Infantino also spoke with PSG, Bayern, Juve and top Premier League clubs. PSG, Man United (Woodward also is a PFSC representative), Bayern and maybe Juve as well could disapprove the proposal while Man City (and Arsenal?) are the least likely to object?

    For leagues (and their clubs) around the world Infantino's proposal is an awful, distorting plan at a time when competitive balance needs a helping hand instead of a punch in the stomach. Infantino has a hard time operating under the pretense that it's about inclusivity. Smaller leagues, via Olsson and Scudamore, have come out against the plans and Infantino has been catering to the biggest clubs, offering them most of the prize money, the most spots and even going as far as making the inaugural edition an invitational one (with some clubs getting in because of commercial/TV reasons). The goalposts move quickly and often when Infantino is involved, whenever the moneyed elite want even more than what's already promised expect them to get their way.
     
  13. jus2nang

    jus2nang Member

    Dec 12, 2005
    North London
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ghana
    I've always wanted to know why it was Vasco instead of Palmeiras in that inaugral competition. What was the justification given?

    The 1999 Copa Libertadores winners were known since the summer, so it's not as if it was too late for them to make plans (plus at that point the Brazilian champions and CAF CL winners weren't determined).

    I've tried to find articles about it, but there doesn't seem to be anything out there (in English anyway).
     
  14. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    Here is the reason. Corinthians were national champs and Palmeiras Libertadores champs. They are both teams from Sao Paulo. In Brazil there was pressure to have a team from Rio participate. Vasco was conveniently the past year Libertadores champs. Palmeiras went agreed as long as they were guaranteed a spot in the following year's edition. Traffic went bankrupt and the next year's CWC was cancelled. Still a sore spot in my team's history specially because Corinthians went on to win it (without ever had winning the Libertadores at that point).

    It was pretty mickey mouse because European players took it as a vacation. Roberto Carlos who was at Madrid said the European players on the team were drinking by the pool same day of some match games.
     
  15. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    I think this new CWC is a great idea. As long as club teams can only use players from their own continent. :D
     
  16. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    I see similar shenanigans playing out ahead of the 2023 tournament. Someone cook up a massive batch of popcorn so we can sit back and watch FIFA embarrass themselves (and HomietheClown defend them every step of the way :sneaky: )
     
    unclesox repped this.
  17. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    The only smart thing about this, and it's from a business perspective not footballing, is that it's once very 4 years. Make it rare and many fans will tune in. Although once every year wasn't really an option.
     
  18. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    In a way you can blame this on the clubs. They started these pre-season tours to Asia and the US playing different teams for global marketing reasons. And then they started calling it International Champions Cup. With fan attendance very good, seemed like a no brainer for FIFA.
     
  19. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    Yah, I guess 12-team tournament every 2 years was the other option. The 24-team option is probably the better choice, but having to play 5 games puts a huge dent in a teams's summer vacation once every 4 years.
     
  20. Nico Limmat

    Nico Limmat Member+

    Oct 24, 1999
    Dubai, UAE
    Club:
    Grasshopper Club Zürich
    Nat'l Team:
    Switzerland
    You mean 2021? This article has a Boban quote that denies the invitation angle. Hope that's the case:
    https://sports.abs-cbn.com/football...d-expects-fifa-cash-streaming-platforms-41753
     
    BocaFan and Paul Calixte repped this.
  21. Nico Limmat

    Nico Limmat Member+

    Oct 24, 1999
    Dubai, UAE
    Club:
    Grasshopper Club Zürich
    Nat'l Team:
    Switzerland
    Good piece by the FT, especially the Nations League bit at the end:
    https://www.ft.com/content/71bbe454-59d8-11e8-b8b2-d6ceb45fa9d0

    So UEFA needs to “transfer the commercialisation” of Nations League games to FIFA for a fee. My gut feeling is most of the UEFA outrage revolves around this. I could see a scenario where Infantino pushes through the CWC next month and revisits the Nations League later.
     
  22. Blondo

    Blondo Member+

    Sep 21, 2013
    It's behind a paywall, so can't say much about it.

    The expanded CWC, getting their claws into the lucrative club game, always looked like FIFA's main objective and there was already a story in the media that FIFA would put the NL plans in the freezer but push ahead with the expanded CWC (yet less money on offer). Neither of the expansion plans could have received a warm reception from UEFA.

    Infantino's deadline has expired now. If there was in fact no deadline, and it can be decided next month, rushing it through was yet another underhanded tactic. "New" FIFA is the same, probably even worse, as old FIFA. Selling the rights off to a Saudi-backed investment fund also is a way to take money out of football. Once that vehicle is in place it wouldn't be a surprise if the rights of other competitions, like the World Cup, will be for sale. It might already make the Qatar 2022 head-ache even more complicated.
     
  23. Paul Calixte

    Paul Calixte Moderator
    Staff Member

    Orlando City SC
    Apr 30, 2009
    Miami, FL
    Club:
    Orlando City SC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So FIFA are basically pulling a Drake, hearing something new on the streets and cribbing it :ROFLMAO:

    @Blondo if you look up the article's title on Google, you can access it that way.
     
  24. Nico Limmat

    Nico Limmat Member+

    Oct 24, 1999
    Dubai, UAE
    Club:
    Grasshopper Club Zürich
    Nat'l Team:
    Switzerland
    Of course but UEFA hold much better cards in the Nations League scenario, especially if the clubs themselves want to participate in an expanded CWC. I just hope UEFA uses its influence to insist that the Europa League winners get to participate. That way they get some benefit out of it (added profile for the confederation's secondary club competition). I enjoy the Europa League and as always tuned into the final this week. Added EL exposure is one of the few plus points for me personally in this proposed expansion.
     
  25. Blondo

    Blondo Member+

    Sep 21, 2013
    So far I've seen quotes from only two clubs, RM and Barca, plus your FT article mentions Juve (was a ? for me). At least as many clubs are against it, of the seven that Infantino tried to convince.

    Also, one of the comments below your FT article echoes the criticism that can easily be levelled at Infantino's proposal to sell off the rights, i.e. money leaving football, something FIFA should actually fight against.

    @Paul Calixte thanks for the tip
     

Share This Page