Puerto Rico Islanders could be out of the NASL

Discussion in 'Puerto Rico FC' started by Luis_Rancagua, Jun 15, 2013.

  1. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    They originally said they were sitting out the spring.

    Then they said they were sitting out the fall, too.
     
    Offebacher repped this.
  2. Offebacher

    Offebacher Member

    May 14, 2006
    Houston
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yes, had my press releases mixed up. Will be interesting to see if NASL announces something at the end of the month or just let this ride until after the fall season and perhaps then mention it.
     
  3. penske

    penske Member

    Feb 21, 1999
    NYC
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I noticed today that the website has been taken down basically for the PR Islanders and is now just the logo. Wonder if this means either the franchise is going to be relaunched or put in hibernation.
     
  4. Luis_Rancagua

    Luis_Rancagua Member

    Apr 16, 2000
    Can you all send emails to NASL commissioner Bill Peterson (bpeterson@nasl.com) and ask him if he could address the issue of the Puerto Rico Islanders at the meeting of the 25th of July. I've already forward him an email and he still has not responded to me.
     
  5. Kolyn

    Kolyn Member

    May 15, 2012
    Waterford, Ireland
    Club:
    Fulham FC
    Would imagine it's something on the agenda already
     
  6. Kolyn

    Kolyn Member

    May 15, 2012
    Waterford, Ireland
    Club:
    Fulham FC
    Actually, something interesting I just noticed -

    The logo on the "new" website doesn't have the flame trailing behind the ball. Every other logo on Google has it.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  7. blkbrnrvr

    blkbrnrvr Member

    Mar 2, 2003
    Auburn metro
    Club:
    Blackburn Rovers FC

    Cost-cutting move.
     
    artml and kenntomasch repped this.
  8. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This TOTALLY means they're coming back, you guys!
     
  9. Bluesfan

    Bluesfan Member+

    DC United
    Aug 12, 2000
    Tampa
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    Scotland
    It was obviously a propane burning flame and the Islanders are just out of gas:)
     
    blkbrnrvr repped this.
  10. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Rumor: Islanders to USL Pro.
     
  11. Luis_Rancagua

    Luis_Rancagua Member

    Apr 16, 2000
    That wouldn't surprise me at all...It's for the best. The team was becoming a joke. They couldn't compete at this level.
     
  12. CCSUltra

    CCSUltra Member+

    Nov 18, 2008
    Cleveland
    Club:
    Hertha BSC Berlin
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, it could give the team a chance to reorganize.

    But I don't see how this helps USL-Pro, if true.
     
  13. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Our leagues need to stay out of the Caribbean, just for the good of the order. But it would make more sense for them and I can't see how USL wouldn't get hot about the prospect.
     
  14. ceezmad

    ceezmad Member+

    Mar 4, 2010
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Red Stars
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Probably for the best. I guess Antigua gets a Caribbean partner,

    Think of the Rivalry :p :laugh:
     
  15. Prosoccercdn

    Prosoccercdn Member+

    Aug 6, 2011
    Club:
    FC Edmonton
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    From the11.ca's NASL expansion article today :

    NASL spokesman's comment on the Puerto Rico Islanders from the NASL BOG Meetings :

    As well, Preston said there is no update on the Puerto Rico Islanders’ status for next year. The Islanders, thanks to financial issues and governmental change, went on hiatus for 2013, and as each day goes by there is more and more cynicism when it comes to the hopes for the franchise’s 2014 return to NASL.
     
  16. Luis_Rancagua

    Luis_Rancagua Member

    Apr 16, 2000
    I just read a small excerpt from Canadian soccer blogger Steven Sandor from the 11.ca... In an interview yesterday, it appears that NASL commissioner Bill Peterson has informed The 11 that he has not yet officially written off the Puerto Rico Islanders to come back for 2014 season. There's still some hope. Hmmm!!!!!!!!! I wonder what Peterson means by this. Could it be possible that other investors are probably jumping on the bandwagon to buy the Islanders. Hey!!! This has already happened with Minnesota last year when Bill McGuire bought the Stars from the NASL. This is what this franchise needs. An owner with deep pockets, and NOT a government run corporation.

    http://the11.ca/2013/07/26/nasl-to-have-unbalanced-split-season-in-2014-to-accommodate-world-cup/
     
  17. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Not going to be easy. They have already said 10 games in the spring, 20 games in the fall. That can be done with 11 teams, but it is harder with 12 (they obviously could go 11 and 22 if they have to.)

    Plus, Sandor.
     
  18. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    From a fixture list POV, it shouldnt be to hard to have PRI play.

    Remember with the 10/20 split with 11 teams, 1 team is going to have a bye on each matchday.

    If PRI can make next season (spring or fall), they can play the team that had the bye, creating a 11/22 season for each team.

    Neither the spring or fall season will need to be extended to make this happen.
     
    kenntomasch repped this.
  19. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    That's a good point. So it will actually require, what, 11 match days to get 10 games for each team?

    That just about fits, doesn't it?

    (Of course, then you have the 6 home/5 road split for six teams in your spring season and 5/6 for the other six, which isn't fair for determining one half of your championship game participants.)
     
  20. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    For spring, we need 11 match days. Between APR-5 and JUN-7, there are 10 weekends, so 1 midweek set of fixtures are requried

    For fall, we need 22 match days. Between JUL-19 and NOV-15, there are 18 weekends, so 4 midweek set of fixtures need to be found.

    I dont think it will be too difficult to fit in around the US Open Cup, CFU Championship, Canadian Championship and Champions League dates
     
  21. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Open Cup would only take a couple of mid weeks out of play in the Spring (and, again, the USOC plays through the World Cup, so any NASL teams that get that far would be playing then anyway) and it's almost finished by the time we get to late July anyway. So its impact is lessened in the fall.

    I don't know when the Canadian Championships usually are, but my sense is they are in the spring, aren't they?
     
  22. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    The Canadian Championship started on APR-24 this year, and finished on MAY-29.

    But they are changing format next year (the two NASL teams will play a 1 game play-in match to reach the semi-finals), so they will probably start 2 weeks earlier next year (my guess...)
     
  23. mng146

    mng146 Member

    Jul 19, 2011
    Rochester, NY
    Huh? A team that finished 2nd and 3rd in the standings the past two seasons was becoming a joke that couldn't compete? At what point in time did this occur exactly? I'd really like to know. o_O
     
  24. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The one thing they COULD do was compete at this level.
     
  25. Luis_Rancagua

    Luis_Rancagua Member

    Apr 16, 2000
    What I meant to say is compete financially in the NASL. They need an owner with $$$$ rather than a socialist state run club. In fact, this is a team that relies on government subsidies. What a joke. I'm not criticizing their historic record on the field, but rather their business structure. Government finance in the operation of a team does not belong here.
     
    brentgoulet repped this.

Share This Page