Premier League Rule changes 2019-20

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by SamScouse, Jul 16, 2019.

  1. SamScouse

    SamScouse Member+

    Jun 1, 2015
    Toronto
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    There are 9 rule changes for the upcoming season - here's the list.

    As the season goes on we might want to keep track of if any of these aren / aren't working (separate from everyone's favourite VAR thread, of course).

    Rule 1 - Substitutions

    To curb time-wasting, players will have to leave the pitch at the nearest point to them

    The desire to reduce obvious time-wasting is fully understandable. Players have grown accustomed to jogging over to the far side of the pitch in anticipation of their number being held up, then beginning a painfully slow walk while the referee chivvies them along.

    But this seems like a risky, potentially inadvisable move. After Eric Cantona’s kung-fu kick in 1995, the rules were changed so that players who had been sent off would walk to the tunnel rather than immediately off the pitch and around its perimeter. That was in response to the vitriolic abuse Cantona had received from Crystal Palace supporters as he walked past two sides of the ground. Players across the board welcomed the rule change.

    Would a better solution not be for the referee to stop the clock when a substitution begins and then restart it as the game commences? That would remove all need for time-wasting.

    Rule 2 - Free-kick walls

    When there is a defensive wall of three or more defenders, the attackers are not allowed within one yard of the wall

    Something that has been addressed because it was becoming more than a little messy. Most free-kicks within 30 yards of goal would be preceded by attacking players trying to squeeze in between defenders, thus causing pushing and shoving as they fought for the prime real estate in front of the goalkeeper.

    In reality, many of these situations ended in fouls that were allowed to go by officials. Attacking players would lean into opponents to create space or impede them from jumping and blocking the shot. Referees could - and maybe should - have penalised these offences, but they were often so difficult to spot (six of one, half a dozen of the other) that it remained a viable tactic.

    The new law will take some getting used to, and the exact measurement of one yard will presumably not be marked with vanishing spray. But it will be interesting to see if it results in fewer shots taken from free-kicks. If you have a three-man defensive wall with no attacking players around it, that leaves the potential for plenty of space for players in the penalty area if the set-piece is delivered into the area rather than at goal.

    And, if that does prove to be the case, is this the beginning of the end for defensive walls? Better to mark those spare men and allow your goalkeeper a clear sight than leave them free and hope to block the shot?

    Rule 3 - Drop balls

    RIP drop balls, basically

    People will rue a part of football culture lost to the ether, and extrapolate that to blame its passing on homogenised, sanitised modern football. But in truth the contested drop ball became a thing of the past a long time ago. Having two players wildly aiming kicks while stood 30 centimetres apart was hardly the perfect way of recommencing play for an official.

    As of next season, the last team to touch the ball will be given it back by the opposition. That seems to suggest that play will start with them rather than, as now, be returned by the opposition (to the sound of polite applause from supporters who appreciate the opposition doing something they are literally obliged by the laws to do). But do players have to return to their original positions? Or can a team (we’re looking at you, Burnley) pile players into the penalty area and use the restart as the chance to launch the ball into the penalty area?

    The other interesting development is that if play is stopped with the ball in the penalty area, it will restart with the goalkeeper no matter which team had possession. Look forward to that angering supporters from August onwards.

    Rule 4 - Goalkeepers’ behaviour for penalties

    No touching of the goal frame, no movement, one part of boot touching goal-line when penalty is taken, no standing behind the line

    This new introduction would seem to risk a repeat of that abuse. Witness the behaviour of the Portsmouth supporter who kicked Sunderland’s Luke O’Nien last week. Football tribalism is on the rise, and forcing players to walk in front of away fans potentially makes them fair game for similar treatment.


    Part of a wider crackdown on gamesmanship, and goalkeepers have been allowed to get away with some delicious nonsense at penalties for too long.

    The ‘no movement’ provision is interesting because it stops goalkeepers attempting to double bluff penalty takers by moving one way before diving the other, and the ‘no standing behind the line’ potentially crucial because goalkeepers would often take a small jump forward onto the line to be in a better position to dive at a diagonal out of their goal and close down the angle.

    But, as before, the whole thing depends upon it being properly regulated. Goalkeepers are already supposed to remain close to the line until penalties are struck, but anecdotal evidence suggests that many get away with moving far beyond it and only a very small percentage of penalties are actually retaken.

    The ‘no movement’ provision in particular is very likely to slip. If a goalkeeper lifts his arm or leans one way as the taker is running up to the spot, is any referee really likely to penalise them?

    RULE 5 - GOAL-KICKS
    A goal-kick is in play from the moment the ball is kicked

    Possibly the most interesting rule change of all. Until now, a goal-kick had to leave the area before being in play. That didn’t used to be an issue; goalkeepers almost always kicked the ball long into midfield where an aerial duel would take place near the halfway line.

    But the rise in passing out of defence, and the subsequent rise of intense pressing high up the pitch to counteract it, has led to false breaks in play. When a goalkeeper passes out to a defender from a goal-kick and that defender has an opponent pressing them, they could deliberately intercept the ball in the penalty area and effectively buy a restart from the referee.

    That is no longer the case. Goalkeepers will be able to pass to team-mates within the penalty area, thus allowing for a far speedier process of passing out of defence in order to combat the high press. You can easily imagine Ederson running with the ball into the six-yard box to play a quick pass to Aymeric Laporte and get the ball into midfield before the opposition has had chance to regroup. One of the slowest elements of modern football is about to get a recharge.

    Rule 6 - Accidental handballs

    A goal scored directly from the hand/arm (even if accidental) and a player creating a goalscoring opportunity after having gained control of the ball using hand/arm (even if accidental) will no longer be allowed

    In truth, this isn’t a dramatic rule change. Deliberate handballs were already outlawed, but if the referee spotted the ball hitting a hand (rather than hand hitting ball) and thus giving the attacking side an advantage in the scoring of a goal, they would have usually blown for an offence.

    But the reality is that referees couldn’t hope to spot every touch on the ball in a crowded area or whether a ball had hit hand or hip, so it’s the change of a rule in combination with the introduction of VAR that will allow it to be fully policed. We do now at least have greater clarity - if it hits your hand, it’s handball - as with hockey and the ball striking a foot.

    It’s also important to note that this is only an introduction for attacking teams, not defenders in their own box. Those debates will continue for now.

    Rule 7 - Celebrations

    A player can be booked for their celebration even if the goal is disallowed

    Good lord. Imagine you score a crucial goal for your team, and it sends you into a bout of emotional disarray. You run at your supporters, who are going equally wild, and embrace them. You’ve done it. You’ve made the difference. You love those supporters. They love you.

    And then you realise that the goal has been referred to VAR and, after a delay, is ruled out. And then the referee comes over and shows you a yellow card for celebrating a goal that didn’t even count. Gutted.

    Rule 8 – Head-to-head records

    If two teams are tied on points, goal difference, goals for and goals against, then their place in the league will be determined by their head-to-head record

    Previously, this situation would result in a play-off between the two sides: something that has so far happened a grand total of zero times. While this is in theory a sensible change, it is very likely to stay theory-based.

    Rule 9 – Scoring from a goalkeeper's throw

    If the ball goes into the opposition goal direct from a goalkeeper's throw, a goal-kick will be awarded

    Again, this is solving a problem that has never actually happened in real life. Worse, if it ever did happen, it wouldn't actually be a problem. Just give the goal.

    https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/premier-league-new-rule-changes-are-they-good-or-bad
     
    EruditeHobo repped this.
  2. burning247

    burning247 Member+

    Liverpool FC
    England
    Sep 16, 2000
    Dallas
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    Makes sense but I could see a problem with it throwing off an AR when he's looking at the 2nd to last defender for an close offside call but I guess that's what VAR is for.

    Cool


    Drop balls remind me of playing when I was little. Not sure when the last time pros actually contested drop balls.

    This is dumb. Why take away any little advantage keepers have? The whole thing is a mind game but the kicker has the overwhelming advantage in the situation.

    I like it.


    Makes sense.

    But why? There's no time being wasted because the player celebrating shouldn't keep the center ref from checking a VAR replay. This one is just dumb.


    No-brainers.
     
  3. usscouse

    usscouse BigSoccer Supporter

    May 3, 2002
    Orygun coast
    Rule 7. Who decides and what is the criteria for too much of a celebration?

    Nice if you've just picked up a silly yellow for finishing a shot on goal after the offside whistle. Then you think you've scored and pick up a red.
     
  4. usscouse

    usscouse BigSoccer Supporter

    May 3, 2002
    Orygun coast
    Never seen a keeper throw a goal. I've scored 2 from kicks. But throw!!!
     
  5. SamScouse

    SamScouse Member+

    Jun 1, 2015
    Toronto
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    the other teams must be getting really scared of Alisson.
     
  6. delaynomo

    delaynomo Member+

    Jun 1, 2015
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Is it even physically possible to throw a football that far, even with hard ground and a following wind?
     
    Wingtips1 repped this.
  7. usscouse

    usscouse BigSoccer Supporter

    May 3, 2002
    Orygun coast
    Jeez, not me! I scored from a kick out of my hands on a nice frosty morn. Their keeper badly misjudged the bounce. The other one their keeper came out of his area to clear from our on running striker. And it came right to me on the edge of my area. Boom!!!
     
  8. zaqualung

    zaqualung Member+

    Jun 17, 2015
    San Francisco
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    I don't follow you ...??

    Play is stopped when a player is leaving the field. He is being directed by the ref to leave. Nothing can happen until he has left
     
  9. zaqualung

    zaqualung Member+

    Jun 17, 2015
    San Francisco
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nobody dhould decide, as the rule shouldn't exist!

    It's just like Trump's hair - who decides when it is too much?
    ;)
     
  10. StiltonFC

    StiltonFC He said to only look up -- Guster

    Mar 18, 2007
    SoCal
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The only ball drop that I have the remotest interest in takes place on New Years Eve in Times Square. And I don't care about that one at all.
     
  11. usscouse

    usscouse BigSoccer Supporter

    May 3, 2002
    Orygun coast
    My balls dropped when I was about 13. Went from a boy soprano in church to a tenor in a Skiffle group. .
    Not much change really
     
  12. StiltonFC

    StiltonFC He said to only look up -- Guster

    Mar 18, 2007
    SoCal
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    TMI
     
  13. usscouse

    usscouse BigSoccer Supporter

    May 3, 2002
    Orygun coast
    Too many interruptions ?
     
  14. StiltonFC

    StiltonFC He said to only look up -- Guster

    Mar 18, 2007
    SoCal
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    you wish.

    no. when an apparently sane man ( who owns a dog, for cryin' out loud ) starts rhapsodizing about his family jewels, he's gone over the edge.

    you should know those things. you're from the right part of the world.
     
  15. usscouse

    usscouse BigSoccer Supporter

    May 3, 2002
    Orygun coast
    Rhapsodizing!! It was a joke you silly person.
    Sometimes I think your family jewels are between your ears.
     
  16. EruditeHobo

    EruditeHobo Member+

    Mar 29, 2007
    San Francisco, CA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Seems like it only applies to taking shirt off... because what other kind of celebrating earns a player a yellow? But then again taking the shirt off is always a yellow, right?

    This is confusing, I don't know how this applies to the game at all.

    Keepers not being allowed to move around on pens is a little dumb too.

    The rest make sense.
     
  17. zaqualung

    zaqualung Member+

    Jun 17, 2015
    San Francisco
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Excessive incitement of the crowd, or some such intangible thing....
     
  18. Wingtips1

    Wingtips1 Member+

    May 3, 2004
    02116
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Hate rule #4. Yeah, they could just tighten up the rule re: goalkeepers being 4 yards off the line before the kick is taken, but that's largely been eliminated by attackers taking unorthodox run-ups to the ball.

    I think it is the unorthodox run-up that should be eliminated. A single continuous and fluid movement instead of these stop-start run ups.
     
    burning247, EruditeHobo and SamScouse repped this.
  19. burning247

    burning247 Member+

    Liverpool FC
    England
    Sep 16, 2000
    Dallas
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    Yes, but when he's walking on the sideline and the play resumes, he could appear to be an attacker or a defender to a linesman on the opposite end of the field. The play doesn't stop to wait for him to walk his happy ass around the pitch or the rule wouldn't exist.
     
  20. zaqualung

    zaqualung Member+

    Jun 17, 2015
    San Francisco
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    It's possible - but c'mon - seriously - he would really need to be a pretty droolingly stupid linesman, or a very near-sighted one....
     
  21. zaqualung

    zaqualung Member+

    Jun 17, 2015
    San Francisco
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Another great example of where a rule shouldn't be uber-exactly defined ... should be that the goalkeeper shouldn't step more than his own foot length off the line... that would allow maximum flexibility and the ref to call it .... or not ....
     
  22. zaqualung

    zaqualung Member+

    Jun 17, 2015
    San Francisco
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    #4.

    The ‘no movement’ provision


    Is a load of bollix......

    Like I said before elsewhere - too many little jumped up Eichmans in modern football... needing to make their mark on the rules for posterity.
    Effin' Posteriors....
     
  23. EruditeHobo

    EruditeHobo Member+

    Mar 29, 2007
    San Francisco, CA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The FA is also implementing sin bins in all levels of grassroots football in England. So might just be a matter of time before that is in, as well.
    According to the rules, it seems exclusively in place to limit players directly whining/showing disrespect to the ref, verbally and otherwise.
    It's not about actions against other players during the actual game, for now.

    It's already been trialed in 31 leagues, according to the FA...
     
  24. zaqualung

    zaqualung Member+

    Jun 17, 2015
    San Francisco
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Imagine at the end of an FA Cup Final and the goalkeeper has been substituted and the sub keeper get into an extra time barmy with the ref over a bad 50-50 looking call......... and has to go to the sin-bin while one of the outfielders goes into goal for the penalty.
     
  25. EruditeHobo

    EruditeHobo Member+

    Mar 29, 2007
    San Francisco, CA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm not surprised that you haven't looked up the rules... there is no 50/50 call that can get someone sent to a sin bin. So rest easy, this can't actually happen.

    I mean... no more than it can't under ALL rules of the game, since 50/50 challenges which could lead to sending offs have always existed and could always threaten to happen at the end of an FA cup final. ********ing obviously.
     

Share This Page