For any onlookers wondering about this thread, it's our Other Teams Thread. Therefore it is dedicated to all other teams in football. We have a tradition (as do many other forums) of coming up with clever current event titles for the OTT. That's all this is, and in no way, or all ways intends to offend regarding the recent terrorist attacks in Barcelona. If you don't know, now you know.
Anyway, Snodgrass looks to be on his way from West Ham this summer. www.bbc.com/sport/football/40968378 That didn't take long...
We will close it if you promise to never post here again. Would everyone else agree this is a fair offer?
If Gatekeeper wanted us to come up with a better name for OTT then he shouldn't have forced so many people to put him on ignore, so that nobody could suggest one of his more memorable comments as a title.
It's confirmed. "Interesting" move to say the least. Wasn't overly impressed with him in the EL final. I get that he's young and has potential, but I'm curious to see how he pans. Then again, I guess he's in good hands as any with Poch teaching him the ropes. We'll see, I guess... www.skysports.com/football/news/11675/10993133/tottenham-agree-davinson-sanchez-deal-with-ajax
the problem with ignore is that it makes people look like they are arguing with themselves. i remember one instance @MizzouMUFC had like 6 posts in a row and I am like i don't know who the hell he is arguing with but they sure pissed him off!!
We'll have to revisit that in a year or so, minimum. Keane was a solid target himself and would have been fine bringing him back. Prem and Englsh football experience are also big plusses for him as well. Jose has done well to keep Lindelof out of limelight at this time. There is absolutely no reason to put him on now, taking the risk to completely shatter his confidence and costing the team precious points in the process. The several options in place give him that latitude towards Lindelof for the time being. His time will come and hopefully by then, he'll be ready to make the most of it.
I'm all for stripping Chaz of the thread title he's so proud of. Is that why I was tagged, because you knew I'd agree?
Nah, I thought you'd be running the joint by now. Maybe we need to summon @nimma Apparently gatekeepr is offended by our OTT title. SO, we've come together as a collective to name it Ignored Mode Activated. Then he won't feel so offended. Can you help us out?
I'm just waiting for the current powers that be to admit that they've lost control and need me to swoop in. Once appointed, my justice will be swift. Also, one of our mods hasnt posted since 2016. How the fvck did he get tenure?
You don't get removed as a mod unless you ask a super mod for yourself to be removed or a fellow mod makes the request.
I'm still waiting on @Ruud v.Nistelrooy 10 to put in the request to make me mod. Give the people what they want.
There really should be term limits for mods, tbh. This "mod for life" thing or as long as you want it, is for the birds as far as I'm concerned. And if you're not active a minimum or just present enough to perform your duties, then you shoudn't be one ether. And it goes without saying that mods should be carefully vetted as well: mods with agenda or eager to go on a power trip really should not be considered either...
Which criteria is so funny? Because to me it all goes without saying to be honest and it's common sense really...
Yeah and politicians only run for office because they want to help people. Grow up Peter Pan. Count Chocula.